Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research Special issue

Study of Contact Temperature During Polishing of Zinc Plate with Ultrasonic Vibration Using Single Pole Magnetic Abrasive Finishing

  1. Gurpreet Singh Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow
  2. Kheelraj Pandey Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow
  3. Ashwani Sharma Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow
  4. Chitra Bajpai Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial College of Engineering and Management, Lucknow
  5. Gaurav Raj Pandey Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amity University, Lucknow

Abstract

The present work scrutinizes the impact of ultrasonic vibration on the contact temperature during polishing zinc plates with Single Pole Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (SPMAF). The efficacy and eminence of FMAB finishing are pointedly influenced by heat generation at the interaction point, as raised up temperatures can lead to the deprivation of abrasive elements or the bonding material inside the brush, which leads to the fading its overall effectiveness. The magnetic abrasive particles (MAPs) play a vital role in the machining region to achieve high-precision surface finishing. Ultrasonic vibrations boost the performance of the flexible magnetic abrasive brush (FMAB), which affects the material exclusion and thermal behaviour. Key aspects analysed include polishing-speed (250–1250 RPM), feed-rate (1.5–5.5 mm/sec), working-gap (4–6 mm), and temperature variations at the workpiece-brush interaction during finishing. The study objectives are to establish a connection between process parameters, contact temperature, and finishing efficiency. Experimental consequences indicate that ultrasonic vibrations influence heat generation within the brush, which affects machining performance and surface features. The results contribute to improving SPMAF parameters for improved thermal management, surface quality in precision engineering applications.

Keywords

References (13)

  1. Shinmura T, Takazawa K, Hatano E, Matsunaga M, Matsuo T. Study on Magnetic Abrasive Finishing. CIRP Annals. 1990;39(1):325-328. doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61064-6
  2. Yamaguchi H, Shinmura T. Study of the surface modification resulting from an internal magnetic abrasive finishing process. Wear. 1999;225-229:246-255. doi:10.1016/s0043-1648(99)00013-7
  3. Jain VK, Kumar P, Behera PK, Jayswal SC. Effect of working gap and circumferential speed on the performance of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Wear. 2001;250(1-12):384-390. doi:10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00642-1
  4. Chang GW, Yan BH, Hsu RT. Study on cylindrical magnetic abrasive finishing using unbonded magnetic abrasives. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2002;42(5):575-583. doi:10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00153-5
  5. Mori T, Hirota K, Kawashima Y. Clarification of magnetic abrasive finishing mechanism. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2003;143-144:682-686. doi:10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00410-2
  6. Singh DK, Jain VK, Raghuram V. Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2004;149(1-3):22-29. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.030
  7. Yin S, Shinmura T. A comparative study: polishing characteristics and its mechanisms of three vibration modes in vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2004;44(4):383-390. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.10.002
  8. Judal KB, Yadava V. Electrochemical magnetic abrasive machining of AISI304 stainless steel tubes. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing. 2012;14(1):37-43. doi:10.1007/s12541-013-0006-1
  9. Xing B, Zou Y, Tojo M. Study on Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Combined with Electrolytic Process–Precision Surface Finishing for SUS 304 Stainless Steel Using Pulse Voltage. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2022;6(1):14. doi:10.3390/jmmp6010014
  10. Yamaguchi H, Srivastava AK, Tan MA, Riveros RE, Hashimoto F. Magnetic abrasive finishing of cutting tools for machining of titanium alloys. CIRP Annals. 2012;61(1):311-314. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.066
  11. Mishra V, Goel H, Mulik RS, Pandey PM. Determining work-brush interface temperature in magnetic abrasive finishing process. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2014;16(2):248-256. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.10.004
  12. Singh RK, Gangwar S, Singh DK. On the temperature analysis of magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum 6060 using finite element method. Machining Science and Technology. 2020;25(2):177-208. doi:10.1080/10910344.2020.1815036
  13. Sharma A, Pandey K, Sood AK. Preliminary Experimental Investigation into Work Brush Temperature on Silicon Wafer Using Single Pole Magnetic Abrasive Finishing (SPMAF). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. 2024:569-579. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3173-2_39
Support