STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research Special issue

Valorization of Human and Cattle Dental Waste into Functional Composite Biomaterials: A Detailed Comparative Analysis

  1. Subhasis Nath Department of Mechanical Engineering, Central Tool Room and Training Center, Kolkata
  2. Sourav Debnath Department of Electrical Engineering, Brainware University, Kolkata
  3. Soumya Mukherjee Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Kazi Nazrul University, Asansol
  4. Sujan Krishna Samanta Department of Biomedical Engineering, Netaji Subhash Engineering College, Kolkata

Abstract

This study investigates the conversion of human and cattle (goat and cow) teeth into bioactive hydroxyapatite-based composites and presents a detailed comparative evaluation of these biogenic materials with laboratory-synthesised (synthetic) hydroxyapatite (HAp). In this work, hydroxyapatite was extracted from human and bovine teeth through controlled calcination and milling, while synthetic HAp was prepared using a standard wet chemical precipitation route. All materials were subsequently sintered at 900 °C and fabricated into pellets for physical and biological analysis. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis confirmed that all samples—synthetic and biogenic—possessed crystalline structures consistent with stoichiometric hexagonal hydroxyapatite. FTIR spectra revealed characteristic phosphate, hydroxyl, and carbonate functional groups, with biogenic samples showing slightly higher carbonate substitution. Physical characterization demonstrated comparable hardness, shrinkage behaviour, densification, and porosity among the samples, with only minor variations attributable to natural ionic substitutions present in biological apatite. SEM analysis revealed interconnected porous microstructures favourable for osteoconduction, while pore-size distribution remained consistent across all groups. A strong negative correlation between porosity and hardness (r = –0.996) affirmed the influence of pore architecture on mechanical properties. Biological evaluations validated the suitability of the materials for biomedical use. MTT cytotoxicity assays demonstrated high cell viability (>95%) for all samples, indicating excellent cytocompatibility. Haemolysis percentages remained below the ASTM threshold of 5%, confirming hemocompatibility. Simulated Body Fluid (SBF) immersion studies showed enhanced apatite formation in biogenic HAp compared to synthetic HAp, highlighting superior bioactivity due to natural trace ions and surface reactivity. The findings establish human and cattle teeth as promising, sustainable resources for producing high‑quality hydroxyapatite suitable for applications in bone regeneration, implant coatings, and other biomedical domains.

Keywords

References (37)

  1. Manickaraj K, Thirumalaisamy R, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N, Massoud EES, Palaniappan M, et al. Value‐added utilization of agricultural wastes in biocomposite production: Characteristics and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2025;1549(1):72-91. doi:10.1111/nyas.15368
  2. Ramasubbu R, Kayambu A, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N. Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with Areca catechu fibers containing silicon carbide. BioResources. 2024;19(2):2353-2370. doi:10.15376/biores.19.2.2353-2370
  3. Palanisamy S, Kalimuthu M, Dharmalingam S, Alavudeen A, Nagarajan R, Ismail SO, et al. Effects of fiber loadings and lengths on mechanical properties of Sansevieria Cylindrica fiber reinforced natural rubber biocomposites. Materials Research Express. 2023;10(8):085503. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/acefb0
  4. Ayrilmis N, Kanat G, Yildiz Avsar E, Palanisamy S, Ashori A. Utilizing waste manhole covers and fibreboard as reinforcing fillers for thermoplastic composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2024;44(17-18):1108-1118. doi:10.1177/07316844241238507
  5. Palaniappan M, Palanisamy S, Murugesan TM, Tadepalli S, Khan R, Ataya S, et al. Influence of washing with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) surfactant on different properties of ramie fibres. BioResources. 2024;19(2):2609-2625. doi:10.15376/biores.19.2.2609-2625
  6. Mylsamy B, Aruchamy K, Marudhamuthu Shanmugam SK, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N. Improving performance of composites: Natural and synthetic fibre hybridisation techniques in composite materials – A review. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2025;334:130439. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130439
  7. Boukhris H, Zidani H, Khalifa AB, Bouslema G, Youssef SB. Environmental Impact of Dental Waste: A Survey-based Analysis of Waste Segregation and Recycling Practices in Dental Clinics. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2025;26(3):250-256. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3845
  8. Klimuszko E, Orywal K, Sierpinska T, Sidun J, Golebiewska M. Evaluation of calcium and magnesium contents in tooth enamel without any pathological changes: in vitro preliminary study. Odontology. 2018;106(4):369-376. doi:10.1007/s10266-018-0353-6
  9. Ratnayake JTB, Mucalo M, Dias GJ. Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2016;105(5):1285-1299. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.33651
  10. Tripathi G, Basu B. A porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering: Physico-mechanical and biological evaluations. Ceramics International. 2012;38(1):341-349. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.07.012
  11. Bagambisa FB, Joos U. Preliminary studies on the phenomenological behaviour of osteoblasts cultured on hydroxyapatite ceramics. Biomaterials. 1990;11(1):50-56. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(90)90052-r
  12. Dev PR, Anand CP, Michael DS, Wilson P. Hydroxyapatite coatings: a critical review on electrodeposition parametric variations influencing crystal facet orientation towards enhanced electrochemical sensing. Materials Advances. 2022;3(21):7773-7809. doi:10.1039/d2ma00620k
  13. Hoai TT, Nga NK, Giang LT, Huy TQ, Tuan PNM, Binh BTT. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite Nanorods for Rapid Formation of Bone-Like Mineralization. Journal of Electronic Materials. 2017;46(8):5064-5072. doi:10.1007/s11664-017-5509-6
  14. Yang CC, Lin PY, Dey G, Maity JP, Sharma RK, Wang CW, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles using biosurfactant and application on mesenchymal stem cells. Ceramics International. 2025;51(14):19091-19101. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.02.088
  15. Guo, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and H. Guo, “Study on the synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles by the chemical precipitation method,” vol. 67, pp. 830–834, Jan. 2004.
  16. Sopyan, R. Singh, and M. Abd Shukor, “Synthesis of nano sized hydroxyapatite powder using sol-gel technique and its conversion to dense and porous bodies,” Indian Journal of Chemistry Section a, vol. 47, pp. 1626–1631, Nov. 2008.
  17. Jarudilokkul S, Tanthapanichakoon W, Boonamnuayvittaya V. Synthesis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles using an emulsion liquid membrane system. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2007;296(1-3):149-153. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.038
  18. Kimura I. Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite by Interfacial Reaction in a Multiple Emulsion. Research Letters in Materials Science. 2007;2007:1-4. doi:10.1155/2007/71284
  19. Baltatu MS, Sandu AV, Nabialek M, Vizureanu P, Ciobanu G. Biomimetic Deposition of Hydroxyapatite Layer on Titanium Alloys. Micromachines. 2021;12(12):1447. doi:10.3390/mi12121447
  20. Muntean FL, Olariu I, Marian D, Olariu T, Petrescu EL, Olariu T, et al. Hydroxyapatite from Mollusk Shells: Characteristics, Production, and Potential Applications in Dentistry. Dentistry Journal. 2024;12(12):409. doi:10.3390/dj12120409
  21. Synthesis of Nano-Hydroxyapatite from Sea Shell and Squid Bone Waste for Advanced Bone Applications via Precipitation Process. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2025;12(9). doi:10.14445/23488360/ijme-v12i9p113
  22. Ooi CY, Hamdi M, Ramesh S. Properties of hydroxyapatite produced by annealing of bovine bone. Ceramics International. 2007;33(7):1171-1177. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2006.04.001
  23. Joschek S, Nies B, Krotz R, Göpferich A. Chemical and physicochemical characterization of porous hydroxyapatite ceramics made of natural bone. Biomaterials. 2000;21(16):1645-1658. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00036-3
  24. Balázsi C, Wéber F, Kövér Z, Horváth E, Németh C. Preparation of calcium–phosphate bioceramics from natural resources. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2007;27(2-3):1601-1606. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.016
  25. Gergely G, Wéber F, Lukács I, Tóth AL, Horváth ZE, Mihály J, et al. Preparation and characterization of hydroxyapatite from eggshell. Ceramics International. 2010;36(2):803-806. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.09.020
  26. Rocha JHG, Lemos AF, Agathopoulos S, Valério P, Kannan S, Oktar FN, et al. Scaffolds for bone restoration from cuttlefish. Bone. 2005;37(6):850-857. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.018
  27. Jaber HL, Hammood AS, Parvin N. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite powder from natural Camelus bone. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society. 2017;54(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s41779-017-0120-0
  28. WAN Y, HONG L, JIA S, HUANG Y, ZHU Y, WANG Y, et al. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology. 2006;66(11-12):1825-1832. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.027
  29. Ruksudjarit A, Pengpat K, Rujijanagul G, Tunkasiri T. Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from natural bovine bone. Current Applied Physics. 2008;8(3-4):270-272. doi:10.1016/j.cap.2007.10.076
  30. & S. S. & D. S. & R. S. & B. P. & N. Samit. Acharjee, “Journal of mines metals and fuels,” Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1–8, Dec. 2023, Accessed: Sep. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/33731
  31. Samanta SK, Chanda A. Study on different characteristics of doped tri calcium phosphate at different sintering temperatures. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2016;1249:020042. doi:10.1063/1.4945162
  32. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27(15):2907-2915. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017
  33. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, Kitsugi T, Yamamuro T. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface‐structure changes in bioactive glass‐ceramic A‐W3. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1990;24(6):721-734. doi:10.1002/jbm.820240607
  34. Hoffman and D. M. Monroe, “Coagulation 2006: a modern viewof hemostasis. Hematology/Oncol,” Clin. North Am., vol. 21, pp. 1–11, 2007.
  35. Bhattacharjee P, Begam H, Chanda A, Nandi SK. Animal trial on zinc doped hydroxyapatite: A case study. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 2014;2(1):44-51. doi:10.1016/j.jascer.2014.01.005
  36. Acharjee, S. Debnath, P. Basak, S. Roy, and S. Kumar Nandi, “IN-VITRO CHARACTERISATION OF MAGNESIUM DOPED HYDROXYAPATITE DEVELOPED FROM CALCIUM HYDROXIDE AND WASTE EGGSHELL.”
  37. 39. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series "Physics". 2023. doi:10.26565/2222-5617-2023-39
Support