STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Polymer & Composites Review Article Special issue Open Access

Utilization of Clay as Source Material in Geopolymer and Alkali Activated Concretes: A State of Art Review

  1. Shaik Sandani Basha Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur
  2. J D Chaitanya Kumar Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur
  3. M.Achyutha Kumar Reddy Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur
  4. Pawar Praveen Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Guntur

Abstract

This innovative research looks at the use of clay as source material for geopolymer and alkali- activated concrete, with a focus on how they could promote green construction practices and perhaps replace Portland cement. Alkali-activated concretes and geopolymers offer low-carbon, eco-friendly alternatives by utilizing natural minerals and industrial wastes. Particularly clay is a plentiful and adaptable option for these cutting-edge products. This review looks at different kinds of clay, like bentonite, kaolinite, and montmorillonite, and evaluates which ones work best for alkali-activated systems and geopolymer systems. It explores the activation processes, emphasizing how clay minerals are changed into strong binding phases by alkaline activators such as sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate. Analyzed is the effect of variables such as alkali-activated concretes, mix designs, and curing circumstances on the functionality of clay-based geopolymers and concretes. According to recent research, these clay-based concretes outperform conventional concrete in terms of mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and permeability. The paper highlights their adaptability by talking about possible uses in waste management, soil stabilization, and infrastructure. The analysis also lists present difficulties and suggests future lines of inquiry for maximizing the application of clay in these cutting-edge cementitious systems. This study intends to promote sustainable construction practices by offering insights into material properties, processing methods, and performance characteristics related to the efficient use of clay in geopolymer and alkali-activated concretes.

Keywords

References (34)

  1. Tahmasebi Yamchelou M, Law D, Brkljača R, Gunasekara C, Li J, Patnaikuni I. Geopolymer synthesis using low-grade clays. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;268:121066. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121066
  2. Yamchelou MT, Law D, Brkljača R, Li J, Patnaikuni I. Pre-treatment impact on the disposition of water in clay-based geopolymer. Open Ceramics. 2021;5:100053. doi:10.1016/j.oceram.2020.100053
  3. Lekshmi S, Sudhakumar J, Thomas S. Application of clay in geopolymer system: A state-of-the-art review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.083
  4. Lekshmi S, Sudhakumar J. An assessment on the durability performance of fly ash-clay based geopolymer mortar containing clay enhanced with lime and GGBS. Cleaner Materials. 2022;5:100129. doi:10.1016/j.clema.2022.100129
  5. Tajaddini A, Saberian M, Kamalzadeh Sirchi V, Li J, Maqsood T. Improvement of mechanical strength of low-plasticity clay soil using geopolymer-based materials synthesized from glass powder and copper slag. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2023;18:e01820. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01820
  6. Kanagaraj B, Anand N, Jerry R, Samuvel Raj R, Andrushia D, Lubloy E. Influence of protective coating on flexural behaviour of high strength self-compacting geopolymer concrete beams exposed to standard fire temperature. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2023;19:e02468. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02468
  7. Kanagaraj B, Anand N, Praveen B, Kandasami S, Lubloy E, Naser MZ. Physical characteristics and mechanical properties of a sustainable lightweight geopolymer based self-compacting concrete with expanded clay aggregates. Developments in the Built Environment. 2023;13:100115. doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100115
  8. Zhong WL, Zhang YH, Fan LF. High-ductile engineered geopolymer composites (EGC) prepared by calcined natural clay. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023;63:105456. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105456
  9. Hamdi N, Ben Messaoud I, Srasra E. Production of geopolymer binders using clay minerals and industrial wastes. Comptes Rendus. Chimie. 2018;22(2-3):220-226. doi:10.1016/j.crci.2018.11.010
  10. Suksiripattanapong C, Sakdinakorn R, Tiyasangthong S, Wonglakorn N, Phetchuay C, Tabyang W. Properties of soft Bangkok clay stabilized with cement and fly ash geopolymer for deep mixing application. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022;16:e01081. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01081
  11. Phetchuay C, Horpibulsuk S, Arulrajah A, Suksiripattanapong C, Udomchai A. Strength development in soft marine clay stabilized by fly ash and calcium carbide residue based geopolymer. Applied Clay Science. 2016;127-128:134-142. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.005
  12. Phetchuay C, Horpibulsuk S, Suksiripattanapong C, Chinkulkijniwat A, Arulrajah A, Disfani MM. Calcium carbide residue: Alkaline activator for clay–fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;69:285-294. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.018
  13. Abdullah HH, Shahin MA, Walske ML. Geo-mechanical behavior of clay soils stabilized at ambient temperature with fly-ash geopolymer-incorporated granulated slag. Soils and Foundations. 2019;59(6):1906-1920. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2019.08.005
  14. Wu J, Min Y, Li B, Zheng X. Stiffness and strength development of the soft clay stabilized by the one-part geopolymer under one-dimensional compressive loading. Soils and Foundations. 2021;61(4):974-988. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2021.06.001
  15. Min Y, Gao M, Yao C, Wu J, Wei X. On the use of one-part geopolymer activated by solid sodium silicate in soft clay stabilization. Construction and Building Materials. 2023;402:132957. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132957
  16. Liew YM, Heah CY, Mohd Mustafa AB, Kamarudin H. Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review. Progress in Materials Science. 2016;83:595-629. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002
  17. Migunthanna J, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Investigation of waste clay brick as partial replacement of geopolymer binders for rigid pavement application. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;305:124787. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124787
  18. Salman AM, Akinpelu MA, Yahaya IT, Salami HM. Workability and strengths of ternary cementitious concrete incorporating calcined clay and limestone powder. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023;86:51-58. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.249
  19. Bediako M, Valentini L. Strength performance and life cycle assessment of high-volume low-grade kaolin clay pozzolan concrete: A Ghanaian scenario. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022;17:e01679. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01679
  20. Qaidi SMA, Tayeh BA, Isleem HF, de Azevedo ARG, Ahmed HU, Emad W. RETRACTED: Sustainable utilization of red mud waste (bauxite residue) and slag for the production of geopolymer composites: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022;16:e00994. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00994
  21. Li S, Zhang J, Li Z, Liu C, Chen J. Feasibility study on grouting material prepared from red mud and metallurgical wastewater based on synergistic theory. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;407:124358. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124358
  22. Chen X, Guo Y, Ding S, Zhang H, Xia F, Wang J, et al. Utilization of red mud in geopolymer-based pervious concrete with function of adsorption of heavy metal ions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;207:789-800. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.263
  23. Migunthanna J, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Investigation of waste clay brick as partial replacement in geopolymer binder. Construction and Building Materials. 2023;365:130107. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130107
  24. And W. C. P. Steven H. Kosmatka, Beatrix Kerkhoff, S. H. Kosmatka, B. Kerkhoff, and W. C. Panarese, Design and Control Design and Control of. 2002.
  25. Nath P, Sarker PK, Rangan VB. Early Age Properties of Low-calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Suitable for Ambient Curing. Procedia Engineering. 2015;125:601-607. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.077
  26. Migunthanna J, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Investigation of waste clay brick as partial replacement in geopolymer binder. Construction and Building Materials. 2023;365:130107. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130107
  27. Okoye FN, Prakash S, Singh NB. Durability of fly ash based geopolymer concrete in the presence of silica fume. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;149:1062-1067. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.176
  28. Özkılıç’ YO, Beskopylny AN, Stel’makh SA, Shcherban’ EM, Mailyan LR, Meskhi B, et al. Lightweight expanded-clay fiber concrete with improved characteristics reinforced with short natural fibers. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2023;19:e02367. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02367
  29. Zawrah MF, Gado RA, Feltin N, Ducourtieux S, Devoille L. Recycling and utilization assessment of waste fired clay bricks (Grog) with granulated blast-furnace slag for geopolymer production. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2016;103:237-251. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2016.08.001
  30. Ghani U, Hussain S, Noor-ul-Amin, Imtiaz M, Ali Khan S. Laterite clay-based geopolymer as a potential adsorbent for the heavy metals removal from aqueous solutions. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2020;24(11):874-884. doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2020.09.004
  31. Hu M, Zhu X, Long F. Alkali-activated fly ash-based geopolymers with zeolite or bentonite as additives. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2009;31(10):762-768. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.07.006
  32. Li J, Si J, Luo F, Zuo C, Zhang P, Sun Y, et al. Self-compensating geopolymer utilizing nano-clay and chopped basalt fibers. Construction and Building Materials. 2022;357:129302. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129302
  33. Amri A, Amartya A, Ilham Y, Sutikno S, Reni Yenti S, Ibrahim B, et al. The addition of low-cost few layers graphene (FLG) to improve flexural strength of coal fly ash based-geopolymer. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023;24:8849-8855. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.150
  34. Naenudon S, Vilaivong A, Zaetang Y, Tangchirapat W, Wongsa A, Sata V, et al. High flexural strength lightweight fly ash geopolymer mortar containing waste fiber cement. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022;16:e01121. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01121
Support