Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research Special issue Open Access

Numerical Simulation of Air Flow Field of A Gas Turbine Engine Air blast Atomizer

  1. Syeed Habeebur Rahaman Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology
  2. P.N. Tengli Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology
  3. Rampada Rana Gas Turbine Research Establishment
  4. Srikanth H.V. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology

Abstract

One of the most crucial process that occurs before the fuel is burned in the combustion chamber is atomization. The performance of a engine will be depend mainly on the fuel mixture. Performance of the engine depends on atomization process because it breaks the bulk fuel into small droplets and injects it into the combustion chamber, in order to make this happen consequently the dimensions of most of the fuel droplets ought to have Sauter Mean Diameter/Same Diameter (SMD) in order that the time for combustion of each fuel droplet remains same. The air blast atomizer uses the kinetic energy of a flowing airstream to disintegrate fuel into ligaments and then into small droplets. Since numerical simulation of the atomizer is complex it is very important to understand the air flow, which is used for fuel atomization in air blast atomizer. CFD analysis at atmospheric conditions was performed in this paper using ANSYS Fluent to validate modelling methodology from accuracy and reliability point of view. The following analysis involves the studies of downstream domain parametrically and selection of the final downstream domain which conforms to the physics of the flow field which have been discussed in detail. Studies on the opted downstream domain were further continued using various air mass flows. Plots were drawn for axial, radial, and tangential velocities, as well as the recirculation zone. Because the flow field in atmospheric settings may be utilized to investigate droplets tracking to compare the test performance data at atmospheric conditions, this research aids in understanding the type of downstream domain needed for atmospheric conditions.

Keywords

References (21)

  1. Rayleigh, L., “On the Instability of Jets,” Proceedings of London Mathematical Society, Vol. 10, pp. 4–13, 1878.
  2. Lefebvre, A. H., Fuel effects on gas turbine combustion— Ignition, stability, and combustion efficiency, ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, Vol. 107, 1985, pp. 24–37.
  3. Reeves, C. M., and Lefebvre, A. H., Fuel effects on aircraft combustor emissions, ASME Paper 86-GT-212,
  4. Rink, K. K., and Lefebvre, A. H., Influence of fuel drop size and combustor operating conditions on pollutant emissions, SAE Technical Paper 861541, 1986
  5. Atomization and Spray by Arthur H. Lefebvre and Vincent G. McDonell (Second edition).
  6. Rana R, Kumar S, Muthuveerappan N. RANS Based Iso-Thermal CFD Analysis of the Flow Field Created by a Radial Swirler in a Conical Nozzle. Volume 2: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions; Renewable Energy: Solar and Wind; Inlets and Exhausts; Emerging Technologies: Hybrid Electric Propulsion and Alternate Power Generation; GT Operation and Maintenance; Materials and Manufacturing (Including Coatings, Composites, CMCs, Additive Manufacturing); Analytics and Digital Solutions for Gas Turbines/Rotating Machinery. 2019. doi:10.1115/gtindia2019-2726
  7. Hinze, J. Ο., “Fundamentals of the Hydrodynamic Mechanism of Splitting in Dispersion Processes,” AIChE Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 289–95, 1995.
  8. Rana R, Nagalingam M, Basu S. Numerical Behaviour of Primary Air Flow Field of a Swirl Injector Under High Pressure and High Temperature Condition. ASME 2021 Gas Turbine India Conference. 2021. doi:10.1115/gtindia2021-76449
  9. Rampada Rana, Muthuveerappan Nagalingam, “CFD Analysis Of Primary Air Flow Field Of A Swirl Injector Using Embedded LES Based Hybrid Model”.
  10. Sankaran V, Menon † S. LES of spray combustion in swirling flows. Journal of Turbulence. 2002;3:N11. doi:10.1088/1468-5248/3/1/011
  11. Colket M, Heyne J, Rumizen M, Gupta M, Edwards T, Roquemore WM, et al. Overview of the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program. AIAA Journal. 2017;55(4):1087-1104. doi:10.2514/1.j055361
  12. Chin JS, Rizk NK, Razdan MK. Study on Hybrid Airblast Atomization. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 1999;15(2):241-247. doi:10.2514/2.5418
  13. Rizkalla AA, Lefebvre AH. The Influence of Air and Liquid Properties on Airblast Atomization. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1975;97(3):316-320. doi:10.1115/1.3447309
  14. Rizkalla AA, Lefebvre AH. Influence of Liquid Properties on Airblast Atomizer Spray Characteristics. Journal of Engineering for Power. 1975;97(2):173-177. doi:10.1115/1.3445951
  15. Wang XF, Lefebvre AH. Influence of fuel temperature on atomization performance of pressure-swirl atomizers. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 1988;4(3):222-227. doi:10.2514/3.23052
  16. Giffen, E., and Muraszew, Α., Atomization of Liquid Fuels, Chapman and Hall, London, 1953.
  17. Zheng, Q. P., Jasuja, A. K., and Lefebvre, A. H., “Influence of Air and Fuel Flows on Gas Turbine Sprays at High Pressures,” Twenty-Sixth Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 2757–62, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996.
  18. Zheng, Q. P., Jasuja, A. K., and Lefebvre, A. H., “Structure of Airblast Sprays under High Ambient Pressure Conditions,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp. 512–18, 1997.
  19. Chen, S. K., Lefebvre, A. H., and Rollbuhler, J., “Factors Influencing the Circumferential Liquid Distribution from Pressure-Swirl Atomizers,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 115, pp. 447–52, 1993.
  20. Rosfjord, T. J., and Eckerle, W. Α., “Aerating Fuel Nozzle Design Influences on Airflow Features,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 849–56, 1991.
  21. Wang, H. Y., McDonell, V. G., and Samuelsen, G. S., “The Two-Phase Flow Downstream of a Production Engine Combustor Swirl Cup,” Twenty-Fourth Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 1457–63, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.
Support