STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research Special issue Open Access

Behavioural Study on Synthetic Fibre Reinforced Soil Cement Stabilized Blocks

  1. S.A.S Vishnu Havish Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, (KL Deemed to be University), Guntur, Vaddeswaram
  2. Y. Himath Kumar , Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, (KL Deemed to be University), Guntur, Vaddeswaram
  3. K. Shyam Chamberli Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation(KL Deemed to be University), Guntur, Vaddeswaram
  4. K. Hemantha Raja Department of Civil Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation(KL Deemed to be University), Guntur, Vaddeswaram

Abstract

It has been shown that the most prevalent material is soil. It is essential to the manufacture of bricks. It is well known that burned bricks function well for masonry projects, providing durability and structural integrity that are vital for construction applications. Furthermore, a significant amount of heat energy is utilized during the heating process that creates them, thus emphasizing the energy-intensive nature of brick production. In addition, children are frequently taken on trips to distant locations, possibly for educational purposes or exploration. Because these blocks are made in basic, manually or semi-mechanized presses, which are operated using user-friendly methods and techniques, the production process remains accessible. These presses utilize readily stabilized dirt that is already present in the area, making them an economical and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional bricks. This approach not only preserves local resources but also promotes sustainability within the community.In presses, local soil stabilized by cement is used to create soil-cement blocks, also referred to as compressed earth blocks or stabilized mud blocks for load-bearing masonry. This process is not only cost-effective but also utilizes significantly less heat energy compared to traditional methods. When it comes to building materials, soil cement bricks are not only less expensive but also more energy-efficient and unconventional when juxtaposed with the typical burnt mud bricks that are commonly employed to construct homes. In this work, Recron 3S fiber—a specific type of polypropylene fiber—is strategically incorporated to enhance the overall strength and resilience of the soil. This innovative approach contributes positively to the structural integrity of the blocks, making them a viable option for modern construction practices.

Keywords

References (25)

  1. Galán-Marín C, Rivera-Gómez C, Petric J. Clay-based composite stabilized with natural polymer and fibre. Construction and Building Materials. 2010;24(8):1462-1468. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.01.008
  2. Mathur VK. Composite materials from local resources. Construction and Building Materials. 2006;20(7):470-477. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.031
  3. Selim MS, Shenashen MA, El-Safty SA, Higazy SA, Selim MM, Isago H, et al. Recent progress in marine foul-release polymeric nanocomposite coatings. Progress in Materials Science. 2017;87:1-32. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.02.001
  4. Yadav JS, Tiwari SK. Behaviour of cement stabilized treated coir fibre-reinforced clay-pond ash mixtures. Journal of Building Engineering. 2016;8:131-140. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.10.006
  5. Danso H, Martinson B, Ali M, Mant C. Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: a quantitative review. Building Research & Information. 2014;43(2):253-262. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.933293
  6. Ige OO, Umoru LE, Aribo S. Natural Products: A Minefield of Biomaterials. ISRN Materials Science. 2012;2012:1-20. doi:10.5402/2012/983062
  7. Alija S, Torrijo FJ, Quinta-Ferreira M. Geological engineering problems associated with tunnel construction in karst rock masses: The case of Gavarres tunnel (Spain). Engineering Geology. 2013;157:103-111. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.010
  8. Álvarez A, Santarén J, Esteban-Cubillo A, Aparicio P. Current Industrial Applications of Palygorskite and Sepiolite. Developments in Clay Science. 2011:281-298. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53607-5.00012-8
  9. Jenkins C, Chadwick A, Hovorka SD. The state of the art in monitoring and verification—Ten years on. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2015;40:312-349. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.009
  10. Khelifi H, Lecompte T, Perrot A, Ausias G. Mechanical enhancement of cement-stabilized soil by flax fibre reinforcement and extrusion processing. Materials and Structures. 2015;49(4):1143-1156. doi:10.1617/s11527-015-0564-z
  11. Tiwari N, Satyam N, Kumar Shukla S. An experimental study on micro-structural and geotechnical characteristics of expansive clay mixed with EPS granules. Soils and Foundations. 2020;60(3):705-713. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2020.03.012
  12. Lecompte T, Perrot A, Subrianto A, Le Duigou A, Ausias G. A novel pull-out device used to study the influence of pressure during processing of cement-based material reinforced with coir. Construction and Building Materials. 2015;78:224-233. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.119
  13. Assadi-Langroudi A, O’Kelly BC, Barreto D, Cotecchia F, Dicks H, Ekinci A, et al. Recent Advances in Nature-Inspired Solutions for Ground Engineering (NiSE). International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering. 2021;8(1). doi:10.1007/s40891-021-00349-9
  14. Tiskatine R, Bougdour N, Oaddi R, Gourdo L, Rahib Y, Bouzit S, et al. Thermo-physical analysis of low-cost ecological composites for building construction. Journal of Building Engineering. 2018;20:762-775. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.015
  15. Properties of Clay Soil and Soil Cement Reinforced with Polypropylene Fibers. ACI Materials Journal. 2017;114(2). doi:10.14359/51689469
  16. Vincevica-Gaile Z, Teppand T, Kriipsalu M, Krievans M, Jani Y, Klavins M, et al. Towards Sustainable Soil Stabilization in Peatlands: Secondary Raw Materials as an Alternative. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6726. doi:10.3390/su13126726
  17. IS 2720-1 Method of Test for Soil Part-1 Preparation of Dry Soil Sample https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2720.1.1983.pdf.
  18. IS 2720-2 Method of Test for Soil Part-2 Determination of Water Content https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2720.2.1973.pdf.
  19. IS 2720-3-1 Method of Test for Soil part 3-1 Determination of Specific Gravity https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2720.3.1.1980.pdf
  20. IS 2720-3-2 Method of Test for Soil Part 3-2 Determination of Specific Gravity https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2720.3.2.1980.pdf
  21. IS 2720-4 Method of Test for Soil Part-4 Grain Size Analysis https://dn790000.ca.archive.org/0/items/gov.in.is.2720.4.1985/is.2720.4.1985.pdf
  22. IS 2720-5 Method of Test for Soil Part-5 Determination of Liquid and Plastic Limit https://ia600207.us.archive.org/21/items/gov.in.is.2720.5.1985/is.2720.5.1985.pdf
  23. IS 2720-6 Method of Test for Soil Part 6 Determination of Shrinkage Factor https://dn790005.ca.archive.org/0/items/gov.in.is.2720.6.1972/is.2720.6.1972.pdf
  24. Bahoria BV, Ranjith A, Laxmaiah G, Solomon Raj S, Ranjan Padhi M, Palanisamy S. Verification of the mechanical behavior of concrete with partial replacement of the fiber resulting from tire retreading. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2024.04.067
  25. Gandhi S, Roji SSS, Motta M, Nalawade RRD, Allah Khan M, Palanisamy S. Analysis of potential incorporation of waste into asphalt pavements. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2024.05.097
Support