STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research Open Access

Numerical Study and Comparison of Passive Mixing in Helical Micromixers

  1. Akash Sinha Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University
  2. M. Zunaid Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University
  3. Afzal Husain

Abstract

A passive mixing inside three micromixers has been studied with water as the mixing fluid. Since the mixing at the micro-level is governed by species diffusion hence it is a time-consuming process that requires an extended length of micromixer for the required amount of mixing. The present study tackles this problem by introducing two helical micromixers, a Three-dimensional helical micromixer (TDHM), and TDHM having four inlets (TDHM-FO). These micromixers need a reduced length of mixing channel while still providing greater efficiency than a simple T-micromixer (STM). A detailed analysis is being presented to analyse the mixing process and performance. Several other parameters have been calculated and presented in this study along with the efficacious Reynolds number. Both the helical micromixers performed better than simple T-micromixer for all values of Reynolds numbers. For low Reynolds numbers (Re≤75), TDHM-FO is better. TDHM provides the best results for Re=310 and 400 which is even better than TDHM-FO and the mixing efficiency for TDHM and TDHM-FO is much better than STM for all ranges of Reynolds numbers. It is concluded that both the helical micromixers provide much better efficiency that too with less mixing length compared to STM. While examining a fluid flow, pressure drop becomes an important parameter to study because it indicates about the amount of energy required to make the fluid flow. Higher the mixing, higher will be the pressure drop and hence more pumping power is needed to drive the flow. Among all three micromixers, STM showed the least value of pressure drop while TDHM-FO showed the highest.

Keywords

References (37)

  1. Hessel V, Löwe H, Schönfeld F. Micromixers—a review on passive and active mixing principles. Chemical Engineering Science. 2005;60(8-9):2479-2501. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.033
  2. Cai G, Xue L, Zhang H, Lin J. A Review on Micromixers. Micromachines. 2017;8(9):274. doi:10.3390/mi8090274
  3. Nazari M, Rashidi S, Esfahani JA. Mixing process and mass transfer in a novel design of induced-charge electrokinetic micromixer with a conductive mixing-chamber. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2019; 108: 104293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.|icheatmasstransfer.2019.104293
  4. Goodarzi V, Jafarbeygi SH, Taheri RA, Sheremet M, Ghalambaz M. Numerical Investigation of Mixing by Induced Electrokinetic Flow in T-Micromixer with Conductive Curved Arc Plate. Symmetry. 2021;13(6):915. doi:10.3390/sym13060915
  5. Kunti G, Bhattacharya A, Chakraborty S. Rapid mixing with high‐throughput in a semi‐active semi‐passive micromixer. ELECTROPHORESIS. 2017;38(9-10):1310-1317. doi:10.1002/elps.201600393
  6. Gidde RR, Pawar PM, Ronge BP, Misal ND, Kapurkar RB, Parkhe AK. Evaluation of the mixing performance in a planar passive micromixer with circular and square mixing chambers. Microsystem Technologies. 2017;24(6):2599-2610. doi:10.1007/s00542-017-3686-0
  7. Chen X, Tian Y. Passive micromixer with baffles distributed on both sides of microchannels based on the Koch fractal principle. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2019;95(3):806-812. doi:10.1002/jctb.6270
  8. Bayareh M, Ashani MN, Usefian A. Active and passive micromixers: a comprehensive review. Chem Eng Process: Process Intensif. 2020; 147: 107771–107812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cep.2019.107771
  9. Lobasov AS, Minakov AV, Kuznetsov VV, Rudyak VY, Shebeleva AA. Investigation of mixing efficiency and pressure drop in T-shaped micromixers. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification. 2018;134:105-114. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2018.10.012
  10. Mariotti A, Galletti C, Salvetti MV, et al. Unsteady Flow Regimes in a T-Shaped Micromixer: Mixing and Characteristic Frequencies. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2019; 58(29): 13340–56. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0125
  11. Fonte CP, Fletcher DF, Guichardon P, Aubin J. Simulation of micromixing in a T-mixer under laminar flow conditions. Chemical Engineering Science. 2020;222:115706. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.115706
  12. Shi X, Wang L, Huang S, Li F. A novel passive micromixer with array of Koch fractal obstacles in microchannel. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology. 2019;42(2):236-247. doi:10.1080/01932691.2019.1674156
  13. Dundi TM, Raju VRK, Chandramohan VP. Numerical evaluation of swirl effect on liquid mixing in a passive T-micromixer. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2019;19(4):363-377. doi:10.1080/14484846.2019.1626527
  14. Farahinia A, Zhang WJ. Numerical analysis of a microfluidic mixer and the effects of different cross‑sections and various input angles on its mixing performance. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2020; 42(4): 190.
  15. Khaydarov V, Borovinskaya ES, Reschetilowski W. Numerical and Experimental Investigations of a Micromixer with Chicane Mixing Geometry. Applied Sciences. 2018;8(12):2458. doi:10.3390/app8122458
  16. Lin Y. Numerical characterization of simple three-dimensional chaotic micromixers. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2015;277:303-311. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.123
  17. Rampalli S, Dundi TM, Chandrasekhar S, Raju VRK, Chandramohan VP. Numerical Evaluation of Liquid Mixing in a Serpentine Square Convergent-divergent Passive Micromixer. Chemical Product and Process Modeling. 2020;15(2). doi:10.1515/cppm-2019-0071
  18. Chen X, Li T, Hu Z. A novel research on serpentine microchannels of passive micromixers. Microsystem Technologies. 2016;23(7):2649-2656. doi:10.1007/s00542-016-3060-7
  19. Usefian A, Bayareh M. Numerical and experimental investigation of an efficient convergent–divergent micromixer. Meccanica. 2020;55(5):1025-1035. doi:10.1007/s11012-020-01142-0
  20. Mengeaud V, Josserand J, Girault HH. Mixing Processes in a Zigzag Microchannel: Finite Element Simulations and Optical Study. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74(16):4279-4286. doi:10.1021/ac025642e
  21. Ziegenbalg D, Kompter C, Schönfeld F, Kralisch D. Evaluation of different micromixers by CFD simulations for the anionic polymerisation of styrene. gps. 2012;1(2):211-214. doi:10.1515/gps-2012-0004
  22. Mondal B, Pati S, Patowari PK. Fabrication of wavy micromixer using soft lithography technique. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;26:1271-1278. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.254
  23. Tachibana D, Matsubara K, Matsuda R, Furukawa T, Maruo S, Tanaka Y, et al. 3D Helical Micromixer Fabricated by Micro Lost‐Wax Casting. Advanced Materials Technologies. 2019;5(1). doi:10.1002/admt.201900794
  24. Taheri RA, Goodarzi V, Allahverdi A. Mixing Performance of a Cost-effective Split-and-Recombine 3D Micromixer Fabricated by Xurographic Method. Micromachines. 2019;10(11):786. doi:10.3390/mi10110786
  25. Goran M. Stojanovic. A microfluidic micromixer fabricated using polydimethylsiloxane-based platform for biomedical applications. Journal of Microelectronics, Electronic Components and Materials. 2018; 48(3): 173–179.
  26. Liao Y, Mechulam Y, Lassalle-Kaiser B. A millisecond passive micromixer with low flow rate, low sample consumption and easy fabrication. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99471-x
  27. Wu SJ, Hsu HC, Feng WJ. Novel design and fabrication of a geometrical obstacle-embedded micromixer with notched wall. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2014; 53(9): 097201. doi:10.7567/JJAP. 53.097201
  28. Mahmud MR. Numerical Investigation of Liquid–Liquid Mixing in Modified T Mixer with 3D Obstacles. Journal of Engineering Advancements. 2021:25-32. doi:10.38032/jea.2021.02.004
  29. Mondal B, Pati S, Patowari P. Analysis of mixing performances in microchannel with obstacles of different aspect ratios. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 2019;233(5):1045-1051. doi:10.1177/0954408919826748
  30. Hossain S, Fuwad A, Kim KY, Jeon TJ, Kim SM. Investigation of Mixing Performance of Two-Dimensional Micromixer Using Tesla Structures with Different Shapes of Obstacles. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2020;59(9):3636-3643. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06741
  31. Dundi TM, Chandrasekhar S, Rampalli S, Raju VRK, Chandramohan VP. Numerical Analysis of Liquid Mixing in a T-Micromixer with Taylor Dispersion Obstructions. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences. 2019;5(1):147-160. doi:10.33889/ijmems.2020.5.1.013
  32. Borgohain P, Arumughan J, Dalal A, Natarajan G. Design and performance of a three-dimensional micromixer with curved ribs. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2018;136:761-775. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2018.06.027
  33. Shi X, Huang S, Wang L, et al. Numerical analysis of passive micromixer with novel obstacle design. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2019; 42(3): 440–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691. 2019.1699428
  34. Dundi TM, Raju VRK, Chandramohan VP. Characterization of mixing in an optimized designed T–T mixer with cylindrical elements. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2019;27(10):2337-2351. doi:10.1016/j.cjche.2019.01.030
  35. Ngo IL, Lai TK, Choi HJ, Le HTT, Kim GM, Dang TD. A study on mixing performance of dean flows through spiral micro-channel under various effects. Physics of Fluids. 2020;32(2). doi:10.1063/1.5142884
  36. Vatankhah P, Shamloo A. Parametric study on mixing process in an in-plane spiral micromixer utilizing chaotic advection. Anal Chim Acta. 2018; 1022: 96–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.aca.2018.03.039
  37. Balasubramaniam L, Arayanarakool R, Marshall SD, Li B, Lee PS, Chen PCY. Impact of cross-sectional geometry on mixing performance of spiral microfluidic channels characterized by swirling strength of Dean-vortices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 2017;27(9):095016. doi:10.1088/1361-6439/aa7fc8
Support