STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Behavioral Sciences Review Article

Evaluating an ai-supported experiential learning intervention: a quasi-experimental study of the joyful saturday model for student engagement and holistic development

  1. Bhargav Rajyagor Department of Computer Application, Noble University, Junagadh
  2. Paresh Vora Department of Computer Application, Noble University, Junagadh

Abstract

Student disengagement, declining academic motivation, and passive classroom participation remain major challenges in modern higher education systems. Traditional lecture-based teaching methods often fail to accommodate diverse learning styles and do not sufficiently promote active participation or collaborative learning. To address these challenges, the present study evaluates the effectiveness of Joyful Saturday, a structured experiential learning initiative designed to improve student engagement, motivation, and holistic development through interactive academic activities supported by data-driven evaluation methods. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was implemented over a twelve- week period involving 642 students from both school and college levels. The intervention included structured weekly experiential sessions that incorporated innovation workshops, collaborative problem-solving tasks, reflective learning exercises, and peer-learning activities. Key outcome variables—including student engagement, academic motivation, attendance, psychological well-being, and collaborative skills—were measured using validated psychometric instruments with strong reliability indicators. Statistical analysis was conducted using paired sample t-tests, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and multiple regression analysis to examine the effectiveness and robustness of the intervention. The results demonstrate statistically significant improvements across all measured variables (p < .001), with effect sizes ranging from moderate to high (d = 0.48–0.92). Engagement scores increased substantially, accompanied by notable improvements in motivation, attendance rates, and student well-being. Regression analysis further revealed that collaborative participation emerged as the strongest predictor of positive academic outcomes (R² = 0.61), highlighting the importance of peer interaction in experiential learning environments. Overall, the findings indicate that structured experiential learning initiatives supported by analytical evaluation can significantly enhance student engagement and academic development. The Joyful Saturday model offers a scalable and practical framework for integrating experiential learning with data-driven educational decision-making, providing valuable implications for institutional innovation and policy development in contemporary higher education systems.

Keywords

References (12)

  1. Bergdahl N, Bond M, Sjöberg J, Dougherty M, Oxley E. Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024;21(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y
  2. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research. 2004;74(1):59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
  3. Kahu ER. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2013;38(5):758-773. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
  4. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 2005;4(2):193-212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
  5. Orim FS, Ofem UJ, Edam-Agbor IB, Nsan NN, Okri JA, Ekpang P, et al. Implementation of automated classroom assessment in higher education using the technology acceptance model. Discover Education. 2025;4(1). doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00481-y
  6. Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh city, Vietnam, pvbang@tvu.edu.vn, Pham VB, Chau THH, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh city, Vietnam, cthhoa@tvu.edu.vn. Student Engagement in the Context of Post-Covid: A Case of Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Instruction. 2024;17(2):321-334. doi:10.29333/iji.2024.17218a
  7. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education. 2004 Jul;93(3):223-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x
  8. Shivaramu HT, Aveen KP, Ullal VN. The role of experiential learning in improving academic performance and student satisfaction in engineering education. Discover Education. 2025;4(1). doi:10.1007/s44217-025-01019-y
  9. Siemens G, Baker RS. Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. InProceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge 2012 Apr 29 (pp. 252-254). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3029435
  10. Vermeulen EJ, Volman MLL. Promoting Student Engagement in Online Education: Online Learning Experiences of Dutch University Students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2024;29(2):941-961. doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09704-3
  11. Zepke N, Leach L. Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2010;11(3):167-177. doi:10.1177/1469787410379680
  12. Zou W, Purington Drake A, Masur PK, Whitlock J, Bazarova NN. Examining learners' engagement patterns and knowledge outcome in an experiential learning intervention for youth's social media literacy. Computers & Education. 2024;216:105046. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105046