Trends in Mechanical Engineering & Technology Review Article

Role of Fluid Engineering in Biomedical and Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Review

  1. Parth M Lakum Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya University, Rajkot
  2. Mayur R. Chotaliya Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya University, Rajkot
  3. Darshan H. Bhalodia Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya University, Rajkot
  4. Heena M Gami Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya University, Rajkot

Abstract

Fluid engineering — the study and application of fluid behavior, transport, and interaction — has become a cornerstone of modern biomedical and healthcare systems. This review synthesizes the multifaceted roles fluid engineering plays across diagnostics, therapeutics, biomedical devices, and physiological modeling. Micro-fluidics enables precise manipulation of microliter and nanoliter volumes, facilitating rapid point-of-care diagnostics, high-throughput screening, and the fabrication of uniform nano particles for targeted drug delivery. In cardiovascular medicine, hemo-dynamics and fluid–structure interaction models illuminate patho-physiological phenomena such as atherosclerosis progression, stenosis related flow disturbances, and thrombogenesis, informing device design and personalized treatment strategies. Organ-on-a-chip platforms leverage microfluidic flows to recreate physiologically relevant microenvironments, enabling more predictive in vitro models for drug testing, toxicity evaluation, and disease modelling. Fluidic design is also instrumental in emerging bio-fabrication and bioprinting techniques, contributing to vascularization strategies that sustain engineered tissues. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), together with multi-physics and data-driven approaches, provides quantitative insights for device optimization, regulatory testing, and the translation of bench-top devices to clinical tools. Despite rapid advances, challenges remain: scaling micro fluidic solutions for manufacturing, ensuring biocompatible materials choices, integrating sensors for closed-loop control, and accurately representing multi scale physiology in simulations. This review collates recent advances (2018–2025) across experimental, computational, and translational studies, highlights application-driven case studies (diagnostics, drug delivery, cardiovascular devices, organ-on-chip systems), and outlines future directions where fluid engineering can accelerate healthcare innovation. By bridging engineering fundamentals with biomedical needs, fluid engineering will continue to drive breakthroughs in personalized medicine, efficient therapeutics, and predictive preclinical models.

This review highlights key applications of fluid engineering in diagnostics, drug delivery, cardiovascular systems, and tissue engineering. Technologies such as microfluidics and organ-on-a-chip platforms support rapid diagnostics, targeted therapeutics, and realistic disease modeling. Hemodynamic analysis and computational fluid dynamics aid in the design of medical devices and personalized treatments. Despite challenges in scalability, material biocompatibility, and multiscale modeling, continued integration of fluid engineering with biomedical science promises significant improvements in healthcare innovation and clinical outcomes.

Keywords

References (19)

  1. Akbari Kenari M, Rezvani Ghomi E, Akbari Kenari A, Arabi SMS, Deylami J, Ramakrishna S. Biomedical applications of microfluidic devices: Achievements and challenges. Polymers for Advanced Technologies. 2022;33(12):3920-3934. doi:10.1002/pat.5847
  2. Cao UMN, Zhang Y, Chen J, Sayson D, Pillai S, Tran SD. Microfluidic Organ-on-A-chip: A Guide to Biomaterial Choice and Fabrication. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(4):3232. doi:10.3390/ijms24043232
  3. Doost, N. F., et al. (2024). A comprehensive review of organ-on-a-chip technology. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11, 11118005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.11118005
  4. Ferreira M, Carvalho V, Ribeiro J, Lima RA, Teixeira S, Pinho D. Advances in Microfluidic Systems and Numerical Modeling in Biomedical Applications: A Review. Micromachines. 2024;15(7):873. doi:10.3390/mi15070873
  5. Gharib, G., et al. (2022). Biomedical applications of microfluidic devices: A review. PMC Article. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9688231/
  6. Leung CM, de Haan P, Ronaldson-Bouchard K, Kim GA, Ko J, Rho HS, et al. A guide to the organ-on-a-chip. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2022;2(1). doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6
  7. Liu Y, Yang G, Hui Y, Ranaweera S, Zhao CX. Microfluidic Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. Small. 2022;18(36). doi:10.1002/smll.202106580
  8. Menon, K. (2024). Cardiovascular fluid dynamics: A journey through our circulation. Flow Journal, 8(2), 45-68. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Syed, F., et al. (2023). Modeling dynamics of the cardiovascular system using fluid mechanics. PMC Article. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10376821/
  10. Zhang, H., et al. (2023). Microfluidics for nano-drug delivery systems. PMC Article. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466004/
  11. Chamate, K. P., et al. (2024). A comprehensive review on bioink based microfluidic bioprinting. Journal of Microfabrication, 7(1), 45-67.
  12. Niyonkuru, V. (2023). Flow dynamics in cardiovascular devices. Research Journal of Clinical Medicine, 5(1), 1-20.
  13. Heylman, C., Sobrino, A., Shirure, V. S., Hughes, C. C. W., & George, S. C. (2014). Integrating 3D microphysiological systems for anti-cancer drug screening. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 239(9), 1240-1248.
  14. Phan, D. T. T., et al. (2017). A vascularized and perfused organ-on-a-chip platform for large-scale drug screening. Lab on a Chip, 17(3), 511-520.
  15. Additional sources: industry reports and review articles (2020–2025) consulted via PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, MDPI, and Cambridge journals.
  16. K. Versteeg, W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics - The Finite Volume Method, Fluid Flow Handbook. McGraw-Hill …. (1995).
  17. D. Morris, A. Narracott, H. Von Tengg-kobligk, D. Alejandro, S. Soto, S. Hsiao, et al., Computational fl uid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine Correspondence to, (2015).
  18. A. Basri, M. Zubair, A.F.A. Aziz, R.M. Ali, M. Tamagawa, K.A. Ahmad, Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Aortic Valve Opening on Hemodynamics Characteristics, in: 2014 IEEE Conf. Biomed. Eng. Sci. 8 – 10 December 2014.
  19. A. Basri, M. Zubair, A.F.A. Aziz, R.M. Ali, M. Tamagawa, K.A. Ahmad, The effect of Aortic Stenosis on the Hemodynamic flow properties using Computational Fluid Dynamics, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Comput.
Support