Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology Original Research
Comparative Performance Study of Rubberized Concrete and Conventional Concrete: Strength, Sustainability, and Innovation
Abstract
The growing amount of car waste is a major problem around the world, and getting rid of old tires is especially important for the environment. Rubberized Concrete (RC) uses broken tire rubber as a substitute for natural materials in concrete, which is a smart and new way to help build in a more sustainable way. This review paper compares how well rubberized concrete works against conventional concrete (CC). The study looks at three main areas: strength (such as how well it can handle pressure, stretching, bending, and impacts), sustainability (how good it is for the environment, how long it lasts, and how it uses waste), and innovation (how the mix is made and how materials are improved). The results show that using waste tire rubber (WTR) usually makes the concrete somewhat weaker in some ways, but it makes it better at handling things like bending, breaking, and impact. This makes it good for certain uses. Also, using WTR helps to reduce a lot of waste that would otherwise end up in landfills. The review talks about new methods like treating the rubber surface and mixing it with other materials to make the concrete stronger and better at connecting with cement. Looking ahead, there is a need for clear rules on how to mix the concrete, more long-term studies on how it behaves over time, and more research into its good qualities like how it handles heat and sound. This study shows that rubberized concrete is an important new material that turns a waste problem into a useful construction material, helping create a more sustainable and environmentally friendly built environment.
Keywords
References (10)
- Mohammed BS. Structural behavior and m–k value of composite slab utilizing concrete containing crumb rubber. Construction and Building Materials. 2010;24(7):1214-1221. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.018
- Li D, Mills JE, Benn BT, Ma X. Abrasion and impact resistance investigation of crumbed rubber concrete (CRC). In: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM23); 2014 Dec 9–12; Byron Bay, Australia. Australia: Southern Cross University; 2014. p. 1–6. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.8/162696.
- Thomas BS, Gupta RC, John Panicker V. Experimental and modelling studies on high strength concrete containing waste tire rubber. Sustain Cities Soc. 2015;19:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2015. 013.
- Siringi GM. Properties of concrete with tire-derived aggregate and crumb rubber as a lightweight substitute for mineral aggregates in the concrete mix [doctoral dissertation]. Arlington (TX): The University of Texas at Arlington; 2012.
- Thomas BS, Gupta RC, John Panicker V. Experimental and modelling studies on high strength concrete containing waste tire rubber. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2015;19:68-73. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.013
- Tran TQ, Skariah Thomas B, Zhang W, Ji B, Li S, Brand AS. A comprehensive review on treatment methods for end-of-life tire rubber used for rubberized cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials. 2022;359:129365. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129365
- Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. Computational modelling of concrete structures reinforced with rubber materials: A review. Constr Build Mater. 2016;120: 59–76.
- Siddique R, Naik TR. Properties of concrete containing scrap-tire rubber – an overview. Waste Management. 2004;24(6):563-569. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.01.006
- Topçu IB, Avcular N. Collision behaviours of rubberized concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 1997;27(12):1893-1898. doi:10.1016/s0008-8846(97)00204-4
- Khaloo AR, Dehestani M, Rahmatabadi P. Mechanical properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire-rubber particles. Waste Manag. 2008;28:2472–2482. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008. 015. PubMed PMID: 18372166.