Research & Reviews : Journal of Ecology Review Article

Livestock and Landscapes: Rethinking Carbon Sequestration Synergies for Transforming Livestock-Raising Paradigm

  1. Md. Emran Hossain Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram
  2. Shilpi Islam Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Gazipur Agricultural University, Salna, Gazipur

Abstract

The livestock sector plays a critical role in global agricultural systems, but its impact on climate change is a growing concern due to significant greenhouse gas emissions, particularly methane and nitrous oxide. As the demand for livestock products continues to rise, rethinking current practices becomes essential to mitigate environmental degradation and enhance sustainability. This study examines the synergies between livestock farming and carbon sequestration strategies within global landscapes, with a focus on innovative approaches that can transform traditional livestock-raising paradigms. It highlights the potential of integrating sustainable practices, such as rotational grazing, agroforestry, and carbon-smart breeding programs, to increase soil carbon storage and reduce emissions. Additionally, the role of technological innovations, such as precision livestock farming and methane inhibitors, is examined to enhance the efficiency of livestock production systems while minimizing environmental footprints. The paper further discusses the importance of agro-ecological integration, which not only increases carbon sequestration but also promotes biodiversity and ecosystem health. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for policy frameworks and incentives that support carbon sequestration initiatives, including carbon-credit trading and certification programs. Ultimately, this study presents a comprehensive approach to transforming the livestock-raising paradigm, offering practical solutions for fostering climate-resilient farming systems and contributing to global efforts to combat climate change. The findings suggest that through strategic integration of carbon sequestration practices, livestock farming can be redefined as a key player in sustainable agricultural development

Keywords

References (78)

  1. Flessa H, Ruser R, Dörsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez MA, Munch JC, et al. Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2002;91(1-3):175-189. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00234-1
  2. Chauhan DS, Ghosh N. Impact of Climate Change on Livestock Production: A Review. Journal of Animal Research. 2014;4(2):223. doi:10.5958/2277-940x.2014.00009.6
  3. Thornton PK, Herrero M. Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(46):19667-19672. doi:10.1073/pnas.0912890107
  4. Brewer KM, Gaudin ACM. Potential of crop-livestock integration to enhance carbon sequestration and agroecosystem functioning in semi-arid croplands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2020;149:107936. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107936
  5. Schatz T, Ffoulkes D, Shotton P, Hearnden M. Effect of high-intensity rotational grazing on the growth of cattle grazing buffel pasture in the Northern Territory and on soil carbon sequestration. Animal Production Science. 2020;60(15):1814-1821. doi:10.1071/an19552
  6. Wagner M, Waterton C, Norton LR. Mob grazing: A nature-based solution for British farms producing pasture-fed livestock. Nature-Based Solutions. 2023;3:100054. doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100054
  7. Roberts AJ, Johnson NC. Effects of mob-grazing on soil and range quality vary with plant species and season in a semiarid grassland. Rangel Ecol Manag. 2021;79:139–149. doi: 1016/j.rama.2021.04.008.
  8. FRASER MD, ROSA GARCÍA R. Mixed-species grazing management to improve sustainability and biodiversity. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE. 2018;37(1):247-257. doi:10.20506/rst.37.1.2755
  9. Jagadesh M, Dash M, Singh SK, Kumari A. Carbon footprints in agriculture: Challenges, mitigation strategies, and future prospects. In: Carbon Footprint Assessments Case Studies Best Pract. 2024. pp. 17–43. doi: 1007/978-3-031-70262-4_2.
  10. Teague R, Kreuter U. Managing Grazing to Restore Soil Health, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Services. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2020;4. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.534187
  11. Ibrahim Khalil M, Francaviglia R, Henry B, Klumpp K, Koncz P, Llorente M, et al. Strategic Management of Grazing Grassland Systems to Maintain and Increase Organic Carbon in Soils. CO2 Sequestration. 2020. doi:10.5772/intechopen.84341
  12. Vigan A, Lasseur J, Benoit M, Mouillot F, Eugène M, Mansard L, et al. Evaluating livestock mobility as a strategy for climate change mitigation: Combining models to address the specificities of pastoral systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2017;242:89-101. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.020
  13. Nungula EZ, Chappa LR, Ranjan S, Sow S, Alnemari AM, Seleiman MF, et al. Ecosystem services through agroforestry systems and its sustainability. In: Agroforestry. 2024. pp. 223–254.
  14. Saikia P, Kumar A, Khan ML. Agroforestry: A sustainable land use system for livelihood security and climate change mitigation. In: C. B. Pandey, M. K. Gaur, R. K. Goyal, editors. Climate Change and Agroforestry. New Delhi: New India Publ Agency; 2017. pp. 61–70.
  15. Grazing with trees. 2022. doi:10.4060/cc2280en
  16. Paterson* RT, Karanja GM, Nyaata OZ, Kariuki IW, Roothaert RL. A review of tree fodder production and utilization within smallholder agroforestry systems in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems. 1998;41(2):181-199. doi:10.1023/a:1006066128640
  17. RAJ AK, RAJ RM, KUNHAMU TK, JAMALUDHEEN V, CHICHAGHARE AR. Management of tree fodder banks for quality forage production and carbon sequestration in humid tropical cropping systems – An overview. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2023;93(1). doi:10.56093/ijans.v93i1.120692
  18. Khan N, Jhariya MK, Banerjee A, Meena RS, Raj A, Yadav SK. Riparian conservation and restoration for ecological sustainability. Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability. 2022:195-216. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822976-7.00003-x
  19. De K, Sharma S, Kumawat PK, Kumar D, Mohapatra A, Sahoo A. Tree shade improves the comfort of sheep during extreme summer. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. 2020;40:103-107. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2020.10.003
  20. Dawid Mume I, Workalemahu S. Review on Windbreaks Agroforestry as a Climate Smart Agriculture Practices. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2021;9(6):342. doi:10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.12
  21. Baker TP, Moroni MT, Mendham DS, Smith R, Hunt MA. Impacts of windbreak shelter on crop and livestock production. Crop & Pasture Science. 2018;69(8):785-796. doi:10.1071/cp17242
  22. Dagar JC, Gupta SR. Silvopasture options for enhanced biological productivity of degraded pasture/grazing lands: An overview. In: Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes: Recent Advances and Emerging Challenges. 2020;2:163–227.
  23. Adetunji AT, Ncube B, Mulidzi R, Lewu FB. Management impact and benefit of cover crops on soil quality: A review. Soil Tillage Res. 2020;204:104717. doi: 1016/j.still.2020.104717.
  24. Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration and aggregation by cover cropping. J Soil Water Conserv. 2015;70(6):329–339. doi: 2489/jswc.70.6.329.
  25. Ernst O, Siri-Prieto G. Impact of perennial pasture and tillage systems on carbon input and soil quality indicators. Soil and Tillage Research. 2009;105(2):260-268. doi:10.1016/j.still.2009.08.001
  26. Sprunger CD, Singh P, Martin T. Integrating perennials into agroecosystems for enhanced soil biodiversity and long-term sustainability. Biodiversity and Bioeconomy. 2024:199-216. doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95482-2.00009-2
  27. Lyons KG, Török P, Hermann JM, Kiehl K, Kirmer A, Kollmann J, et al. Challenges and opportunities for grassland restoration: A global perspective of best practices in the era of climate change. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2023;46:e02612. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02612
  28. Abdalla K, Mutema M, Chivenge P, Everson C, Chaplot V. Grassland rehabilitation significantly increases soil carbon stocks by reducing net soil CO 2 emissions. Soil Use and Management. 2022;38(2):1250-1265. doi:10.1111/sum.12790
  29. Ojija F. Perennial grasses: natural allies for soil health and biodiversity, climate change mitigation, and invasive plant management. Grass Research. 2024;4(1):0-0. doi:10.48130/grares-0024-0019
  30. Corlett RT. Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2016;31(6):453-462. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017
  31. Magdoff F, Weil R. Soil Organic Matter Management Strategies. Advances in Agroecology. 2004. doi:10.1201/9780203496374.ch2
  32. Murphy BW. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties—a review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Research. 2015;53(6):605-635. doi:10.1071/sr14246
  33. No-till Farming Systems for Sustainable Agriculture. 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46409-7
  34. Reicosky DC. Carbon sequestration and environmental benefits from no-till systems. In: No-till farming systems. Spec Publ. 2008;3:43–58.
  35. Lal R. Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. Soil Science. 1998;163(1):83-85. doi:10.1097/00010694-199801000-00012
  36. Goldan E, Nedeff V, Barsan N, Culea M, Panainte-Lehadus M, Mosnegutu E, et al. Assessment of Manure Compost Used as Soil Amendment—A Review. Processes. 2023;11(4):1167. doi:10.3390/pr11041167
  37. Pajura R. Composting municipal solid waste and animal manure in response to the current fertilizer crisis - a recent review. Science of The Total Environment. 2024;912:169221. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169221
  38. Obileke K, Nwokolo N, Makaka G, Mukumba P, Onyeaka H. Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy—A review. Energy & Environment. 2020;32(2):191-225. doi:10.1177/0958305x20923117
  39. Schröder J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresource Technology. 2005;96(2):253-261. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.05.015
  40. Mupambwa HA, Mnkeni PNS. Optimizing the vermicomposting of organic wastes amended with inorganic materials for production of nutrient-rich organic fertilizers: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(11):10577-10595. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1328-4
  41. Kumar S, Malav LC, Malav MK, Khan SA. Biogas slurry: Source of nutrients for eco-friendly agriculture. Int J Ext Res. 2015;2(Feb):42–46.
  42. Rahaman MA, Zhang Q, Shi Y, Zhan X, Li G. Biogas slurry application could potentially reduce N2O emissions and increase crop yield. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;778:146269. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146269
  43. Singh A, Sangramsing PB, Cheenu K, Vivek K. Integrated farming system. J Pharm Innov. 2022;11:1488–1496.
  44. Reddy PP. Integrated Crop–Livestock Farming Systems. Sustainable Intensification of Crop Production. 2016:357-370. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2702-4_23
  45. Turmel MS, Speratti A, Baudron F, Verhulst N, Govaerts B. Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agricultural Systems. 2015;134:6-16. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.009
  46. Hendrickson J, Sanderson M. Perennial-Based Agricultural Systems and Livestock Impact on Soil and Ecological Services. Soil Health and Intensification of Agroecosytems. 2017:151-171. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805317-1.00007-5
  47. Capstaff NM, Miller AJ. Improving the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00535
  48. Arthur PF, Herd RM. Efficiency of feed utilisation by livestock — Implications and benefits of genetic improvement. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2005;85(3):281-290. doi:10.4141/a04-062
  49. Waghorn GC, Hegarty RS. Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2011;166-167:291-301. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.019
  50. Patra AK, Saxena J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2010;91(1):24-37. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4152
  51. McCauley JI, Labeeuw L, Jaramillo-Madrid AC, Nguyen LN, Nghiem LD, Chaves AV, et al. Management of Enteric Methanogenesis in Ruminants by Algal-Derived Feed Additives. Current Pollution Reports. 2020;6(3):188-205. doi:10.1007/s40726-020-00151-7
  52. Tseten T, Sanjorjo RA, Kwon M, Kim SW. Strategies to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions from Ruminant Animals. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2022;32(3):269-277. doi:10.4014/jmb.2202.02019
  53. Honan M, Feng X, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E. Feed additives as a strategic approach to reduce enteric methane production in cattle: modes of action, effectiveness and safety. Animal Production Science. 2021;62(14):1303-1317. doi:10.1071/an20295
  54. Neethirajan S, Kemp B. Digital Livestock Farming. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research. 2021;32:100408. doi:10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100408
  55. Mandal A, Majumder A, Dhaliwal SS, Toor AS, Mani PK, Naresh RK, et al. Impact of agricultural management practices on soil carbon sequestration and its monitoring through simulation models and remote sensing techniques: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2020;52(1):1-49. doi:10.1080/10643389.2020.1811590
  56. Li T, Cui L, Wu Y, McLaren TI, Xia A, Pandey R, et al. Soil Organic Carbon Estimation via Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Techniques: Global Topic Modeling and Research Trend Exploration. Remote Sensing. 2024;16(17):3168. doi:10.3390/rs16173168
  57. Belanche A, Bannink A, Dijkstra J, Durmic Z, Garcia F, Santos FG, et al. Feed additives for methane mitigation: A guideline to uncover the mode of action of antimethanogenic feed additives for ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science. 2025;108(1):375-394. doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25046
  58. Chel A, Kaushik G. Renewable energy for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2011;31(1):91-118. doi:10.1051/agro/2010029
  59. Majeed Y, Khan MU, Waseem M, Zahid U, Mahmood F, Majeed F, et al. Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Reports. 2023;10:344-359. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.032
  60. Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Yuan Z, Wang M, Wang F, Li S, et al. Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. The Innovation. 2021;2(4):100180. doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180
  61. Jensen TA, Antille DL, Tullberg JN. Improving On-farm Energy Use Efficiency by Optimizing Machinery Operations and Management: A Review. Agricultural Research. 2024;14(1):15-33. doi:10.1007/s40003-024-00824-5
  62. Alemu A, Zewide I. Review on rehabilitation of degraded lands. Br J Earth Sci Res. 2021;9(2):38–62. doi:10.37745/bjesr.2013.
  63. Abdelhak M. Soil improvement in arid and semiarid regions for sustainable development. Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability. 2022:73-90. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822976-7.00026-0
  64. Morris K, Reich P. Understanding the relationship between livestock grazing and wetland condition. Arthur Rylah Inst Environ Res Tech Rep Ser. 2013;252.
  65. Wu S, Bashir MA, Raza QUA, Rehim A, Geng Y, Cao L. Application of riparian buffer zone in agricultural non-point source pollution control—A review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2023;7. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2023.985870
  66. Mant J, Gill AB, Janes M, Hammond D. Restoration of rivers and floodplains. In: J. Van Andel, J, Alonson, editors. Restoration Ecology: The New Frontier. Wiley-Blackwell. Restor Ecol New Front. 2012:214–232.
  67. Kumari G, Saini A, Lakshmi, Sahoo C. Organic and natural farming; Concept and principles. In: Climate Change and Agriculture - Its Impact and Mitigation Potential. Kripa-Drishti Publications; 2024. pp. 193–203.
  68. Légère A, Shirtliffe SJ, Vanasse A, Gulden RH. Extreme grain-based cropping systems: When herbicide-free weed management meets conservation tillage in northern climates. Weed Technol. 2013;27(1):204–211. doi:10.2307/23358327.
  69. Prajapati SK, Dayal P, Kumar V, Gairola A. Green manuring: A sustainable path to improve soil health and fertility. AgriSustain Int J. 2023;1(2):24–33.
  70. Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, Hilali A, Bennis I, Zeroual Y, et al. Nitrogen Fixing Azotobacter Species as Potential Soil Biological Enhancers for Crop Nutrition and Yield Stability. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379
  71. Lokuge N, Anders S. Carbon-credit systems in agriculture: A review of literature. Sch Public Policy Publ. 2022;15.
  72. Marks AB. (Carbon) farming our way out of climate change. Denver Law Rev. 2020;97(3):497–556.
  73. Sircely J, Nganga I, Temesgen T, Zerfu E. Introduction to multi stakeholder action research for restoration of communal grazing lands. ILRI Res Rep. 2020.
  74. Wang G, Mang S, Cai H, Liu S, Zhang Z, Wang L, et al. Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends. Journal of Forestry Research. 2016;27(5):967-994. doi:10.1007/s11676-016-0293-3
  75. Wolka K, Uma T, Tofu DA. The role of integrated watershed management in climate change adaptation for small-scale farmers in Southwest Ethiopia. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2023;19:100260. doi:10.1016/j.indic.2023.100260
  76. Shelef O, Weisberg PJ, Provenza FD. The Value of Native Plants and Local Production in an Era of Global Agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.02069
  77. Lee-Smith D, Prain G, Cofie O, van Veenhuizen R, Karanja N. Urban and peri-urban farming systems. Farming Systems and Food Security in Africa. 2019:504-531. doi:10.4324/9781315658841-16
  78. Zajdband AD. Integrated Agri-Aquaculture Systems. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. 2011:87-127. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1521-9_4
Support