Research and Reviews : Journal of Computational Biology Original Research

Integrative Network Biology Analysis of GSE6011 Uncovers Molecular Signatures in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

  1. Shashikala Department of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, Sec-62
  2. Vibha Rani Department of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, Sec-62
  3. Shazia Haider Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare, severe neuromuscular disorder demonstrated by progressive skeletal muscle deterioration and premature mortality. Despite advances in supportive care, no definitive cure exists, highlighting the need to explore novel molecular targets. The current study aimed to uncover key dysregulated genes and molecular pathways in DMD through a dataset-specific network biology approach. Publicly available microarray data (GSE6011) from DMD quadriceps muscle biopsies of 22 patients and 14 age-matched healthy controls were analyzed using GEO2R to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using an adjusted p-value 0.5. The Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed via STRING and analyzed in Cytoscape, with hub genes identified using the Maximal Clique Centrality method in cytoHubba. Functional and pathway enrichment analyses were explored using Enrichr. A total of 159 DEGs were identified, including 19 genes that were found to be overregulated and 140 were downregulated. The PPI network revealed highly connected hub genes. Downregulated hubs included COL1A1, COL3A1, COL1A2, POSTN, LUM, COL6A3, SPARC, FBN1, COL5A2, and COL5A1, enriched in extracellular matrix organization, collagen fibril assembly, and fibrosis-related pathways. Upregulated hubs LPIN1, LPL, and UCP3 were linked to fatty acid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and oxidative stress regulation. These expression patterns suggest late-stage ECM remodeling with a concurrent metabolic shift in dystrophic muscle. Furthermore, molecular docking was performed to evaluate the binding interactions of FDA-approved DMD drugs (Amondys 45, Emflaza, and Vyondys 53) with the upregulated hub protein LPL, revealing favorable binding affinities and potential therapeutic relevance. This network biology and docking analysis highlights ECM remodeling and metabolic regulators as key components of DMD pathology, offering potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Keywords

References (35)

  1. Birnkrant DJ, Bushby K, Bann CM, Apkon SD, Blackwell A, Brumbaugh D, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: Diagnosis, and neuromuscular, rehabilitation, endocrine, and gastrointestinal and nutritional management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(3):251–267. doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(18)30024–3.
  2. Crisafulli S, Sultana J, Fontana A, Salvo F, Messina S, Trifirò G. Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):141. doi:10.1186/s13023-020-01430–8.
  3. Thapa S. Vascular therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). 2023;(3).
  4. Hoffman EP, Brown RH, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: The protein product of the duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 1987;51(6):919–928. doi:10.1016/0092–8674(87)90579–4.
  5. Darras BT, Menache-Starobinski CC, Hinton V, Kunkel LM. Dystrophinopathies. 2nd ed. Elsevier Inc.; 2015. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12–417044-5.00030–5.
  6. Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, Case LE, Clemens PR, Cripe L, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: Diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):77–93. doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(09)70271–6.
  7. Verhaart IEC, Aartsma-Rus A. Therapeutic developments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2019;15(7):373-386. doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0203-3
  8. Le Guiner C, Servais L, Montus M, Larcher T, Fraysse B, Moullec S, et al. Long-term microdystrophin gene therapy is effective in a canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms16105
  9. Xin C, Chu X, Wei W, Kuang B, Wang Y, Tang Y, et al. Combined gene therapy via VEGF and mini-dystrophin synergistically improves pathologies in temporalis muscle of dystrophin/utrophin double knockout mice. Human Molecular Genetics. 2021;30(14):1349-1359. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddab120
  10. PTC Therapeutics. EMFLAZA (deflazacort) – Prescribing Information. New Jersey; 2024. Available at www.fda.gov/medwatch
  11. Shimizu-Motohashi Y, Murakami T, Kimura E, Komaki H, Watanabe N. Exon skipping for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2018;13(1). doi:10.1186/s13023-018-0834-2
  12. Zitnik M, Li MM, Wells A, Glass K, Morselli Gysi D, Krishnan A, et al. Current and future directions in network biology. Bioinformatics Advances. 2024;4(1). doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae099
  13. Agu PC, Afiukwa CA, Orji OU, Ezeh EM, Ofoke IH, Ogbu CO, et al. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-023-40160-2
  14. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;41(D1):D991-D995. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1193
  15. Pescatori M, Broccolini A, Minetti C, Bertini E, Bruno C, D'amico A, et al. Gene expression profiling in the early phases of DMD: a constant molecular signature characterizes DMD muscle from early postnatal life throughout disease progression. The FASEB Journal. 2007;21(4):1210-1226. doi:10.1096/fj.06-7285com
  16. Milad N, White Z, Tehrani AY, Sellers S, Rossi FMV, Bernatchez P. Increased plasma lipid levels exacerbate muscle pathology in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Skeletal Muscle. 2017;7(1). doi:10.1186/s13395-017-0135-9
  17. Lombardo SD, Basile MS, Ciurleo R, Bramanti A, Arcidiacono A, Mangano K, et al. A Network Medicine Approach for Drug Repurposing in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Genes. 2021;12(4):543. doi:10.3390/genes12040543
  18. Wei Y, Su Q, Li X. Identification of hub genes related to Duchenne muscular dystrophy by weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Medicine. 2022;101(52):e32603. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000032603
  19. Szklarczyk D, Kirsch R, Koutrouli M, Nastou K, Mehryary F, Hachilif R, et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;51(D1):D638-D646. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1000
  20. Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, Ho CW, Ko MT, Lin CY. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Systems Biology. 2014;8(S4). doi:10.1186/1752-0509-8-s4-s11
  21. Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44(W1):W90-W97. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377
  22. Kim S, Thiessen PA, Bolton EE, Chen J, Fu G, Gindulyte A, et al. PubChem Substance and Compound databases. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;44(D1):D1202-D1213. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv951
  23. O'Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2011;3(1). doi:10.1186/1758-2946-3-33
  24. Dallakyan S, Olson AJ. Small-Molecule Library Screening by Docking with PyRx. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2014:243-250. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19
  25. Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2004;5(2):101-113. doi:10.1038/nrg1272
  26. Ieronimakis N, Hays A, Prasad A, Janebodin K, Duffield JS, Reyes M. PDGFRα signalling promotes fibrogenic responses in collagen‐producing cells in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The Journal of Pathology. 2016;240(4):410-424. doi:10.1002/path.4801
  27. Serrano AL, Muñoz-Cánoves P. Fibrosis development in early-onset muscular dystrophies: Mechanisms and translational implications. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 2017;64:181-190. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.09.013
  28. González-González L, Alonso J. Periostin: A Matricellular Protein With Multiple Functions in Cancer Development and Progression. Frontiers in Oncology. 2018;8. doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00225
  29. Chakravarti S, Magnuson T, Lass JH, Jepsen KJ, Lamantia C, Carroll H. Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: Skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J Cell Biol. 1998;141(5):1277–1286. Available at http://www.jcb.org [Accessed on September 2025].
  30. Bradshaw AD. Diverse biological functions of the SPARC family of proteins. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2012;44(3):480-488. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2011.12.021
  31. Ramirez F, Pereira L. The fibrillins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999;31(2):255–259. doi:10.1016/S1357–2725(98)00109–5.
  32. Donkor J, Sariahmetoglu M, Dewald J, Brindley DN, Reue K. Three Mammalian Lipins Act as Phosphatidate Phosphatases with Distinct Tissue Expression Patterns. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2007;282(6):3450-3457. doi:10.1074/jbc.m610745200
  33. Boss O, Hagen T, Lowell BB. Uncoupling proteins 2 and 3: potential regulators of mitochondrial energy metabolism. Diabetes. 2000;49(2):143-156. doi:10.2337/diabetes.49.2.143
  34. White Z, Hakim CH, Theret M, Yang NN, Rossi F, Cox D, et al. High prevalence of plasma lipid abnormalities in human and canine Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies depicts a new type of primary genetic dyslipidemia. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2020;14(4):459-469.e0. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2020.05.098
  35. Geldenhuys WJ, Caporoso J, Leeper TC, Lee YK, Lin L, Darvesh AS, et al. Structure-activity and in vivo evaluation of a novel lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activator. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2017;27(2):303-308. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.11.053
Support