Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research Special issue

Enhancement of Mechanical Properties in Hemp Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites Using Graphene Nanoplatelets

  1. Bothichandar Theethan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharda University, SET, Greater Noida
  2. Bhim Singh Department of Mechanical Engineering, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad

Abstract

This study investigates how incorporating graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) influences the mechanical performance of hemp fiber–reinforced epoxy composites. Hemp fibers were chemically treated by alkali treatment to improve fiber–matrix adhesion owing to their high specific strength, stiffness, renewability, and environmental friendliness. Graphene nanoplatelets were dispersed in acetone by probe sonication and added to acetone epoxy matrix at a concentration of 0.5 wt% and 1.0 wt%, respectively. Composite laminates were prepared by means of a combined hand-layup and vacuum bagging to achieve complete adhesion and consolidation. Tensile and flexural tests were conducted on specimens prepared from cured composite plates according to ASTM D3039 and D7264 standards, respectively. The results showed that small amounts of graphene (0.2 wt% for GF6 and 0.1 wt% each for GF5 and GF7) drastically increased the tensile strength, modulus and elongation and flexural strength and stiffness greatly exceeded those of the neat hemp/epoxy control. The maximum enhancement in mechanical properties was found for the 1.0 wt% GNP composite suggesting the more efficient stress transfer mechanism and crack arresting capacity of GNP which may arise from the homogeneous dispersion of graphene and greater fiber–matrix interfacial bonding. This study demonstrates the possibility of using graphene nanoplatelets as an efficient nano-reinforcement in natural fiber composites by minimizing the micro voids and improving the mechanical integrity without sacrificing the flexibility. These results indicate that GNPs could broaden the spectrum of hemp fiber composites toward structural components for automotive, aerospace and construction by providing biobased materials with a higher mechanical performance.

Keywords

References (28)

  1. Aldridge M, Waas A, Kieffer J. Spatially resolved, in situ elastic modulus of thermoset polymer amidst carbon fibers in a polymer matrix composite. Composites Science and Technology. 2014;98:22-27. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.002
  2. O'Masta MR, Russell BP, Ronan W. Inter-ply angle influence on the out-of-plane compressive response of polyethylene fibre laminates. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2018;110:11-20. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.032
  3. Karuppiah G, Kuttalam KC, Palaniappan M, Santulli C, Palanisamy S. Multiobjective Optimization of Fabrication Parameters of Jute Fiber/Polyester Composites with Egg Shell Powder and Nanoclay Filler. Molecules. 2020;25(23):5579. doi:10.3390/molecules25235579
  4. Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S. Graphene based materials: Past, present and future. Progress in Materials Science. 2011;56(8):1178-1271. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.003
  5. Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW. Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites. Macromolecules. 2010;43(16):6515-6530. doi:10.1021/ma100572e
  6. Sharma S, Kaur M. Hemp fiber: a sustainable reinforcement for polymer composites. J Nat Fibers. 2020;17(3):345–357. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1459121.
  7. Shen XJ, Liu Y, Xiao HM, Feng QP, Yu ZZ, Fu SY. The reinforcing effect of graphene nanosheets on the cryogenic mechanical properties of epoxy resins. Composites Science and Technology. 2012;72(13):1581-1587. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.021
  8. Durmuş-Sayar A, Tansan M, Çinko-Çoban T, Serttan D, Dizman B, Yildiz M, et al. Incorporation of Graphene Nanoplatelets into Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites in the Presence of Highly Branched Waterborne Polyurethanes. Polymers. 2024;16(6):828. doi:10.3390/polym16060828
  9. Çakir M, Akin E. Mechanical properties of low‐density heat‐resistant polyimide‐based advanced composite sandwich panels. Polymer Composites. 2021;43(2):827-847. doi:10.1002/pc.26414
  10. Li Z, Zhao X, Ye L, Coates P, Caton-Rose F, Martyn M. Structure and blood compatibility of highly oriented poly(l-lactic acid) chain extended by ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether. Polymer. 2015;56:523-534. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.035
  11. Tan Z, Dong W, Mei J, Liu J, Liu J, Tang Y. Strength and mechanical response of C/C composite open-hole and bolted plates. Materials Testing. 2017;59(9):774-778. doi:10.3139/120.111067
  12. Das TK, Prusty S. Graphene-Based Polymer Composites and Their Applications. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. 2013;52(4):319-331. doi:10.1080/03602559.2012.751410
  13. Ramesh P, Rajendran A. Green synthesis of nickel oxide nanoparticles for photodegradation analysis. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;68:367-372. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.226
  14. Colle R, Grosso G, Ronzani A, Gazzano M, Palermo V. Anisotropic molecular packing of soluble C60 fullerenes in hexagonal nanocrystals obtained by solvent vapor annealing. Carbon. 2012;50(3):1332-1337. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.003
  15. Bhatnagar A, Gupta R. Vacuum bagging technique for improved fiber-matrix adhesion in composites. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2021;40(5):215–225. doi:10.1177/0731684420976455.
  16. Mehta R, Gupta A. Load transfer efficiency in graphene-reinforced fiber composites. Compos Interfaces. 2019;26(7):621–635. doi:10.1080/09276440.2018.1564523.
  17. Kumar R, Kumar Sahoo A, Chandra Mishra P, Panda A, Kumar Das R, Roy S. Prediction of Machining Performances in Hardened AISI D2 Steel. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2019;18:2486-2495. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.105
  18. Padmanabhan RG, Rajesh S, Karthikeyan S, Palanisamy S, Ilyas RA, Ayrilmis N, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties and Fick’s diffusion behaviour of aluminum-DMEM reinforced with hemp/bamboo/basalt woven fiber metal laminates under different stacking sequences. Ain Shams Eng J. 2024;15(7):102759.
  19. Maung PT, Prusty BG, Phillips AW, St John NA. Curved fibre path optimisation for improved shape adaptive composite propeller blade design. Composite Structures. 2021;255:112961. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112961
  20. Nik Pauzi NNP, A. Majid R, Dzulkifli MH, Yahya MY. Development of rigid bio-based polyurethane foam reinforced with nanoclay. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2014;67:521-526. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.004
  21. Ayrilmis N, Kanat G, Yildiz Avsar E, Palanisamy S, Ashori A. Utilizing waste manhole covers and fibreboard as reinforcing fillers for thermoplastic composites. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2025;44(17-18):1108–1118.
  22. Ramasubbu R, Kayambu A, Palanisamy S, Ayrilmis N. Mechanical properties of epoxy composites reinforced with Areca catechu fibers containing silicon carbide. 2024;19(2).
  23. Aruchamy K, Karuppusamy M, Krishnakumar S, Palanisamy S, Jayamani M, Sureshkumar K, et al. Enhancement of mechanical properties of hybrid polymer composites using palmyra palm and coconut sheath fibers: the role of tamarind shell powder. 2025;20(1).
  24. Liu X, Ding ZS, Jiang FS, Ding XH, Jin B, Chen SH, et al. Preparation, identification, and evaluation of PEGylated puerarin. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2012;127(3):2102-2109. doi:10.1002/app.37513
  25. Roy A, Mehta R. Hand lay-up technique for natural fiber composites: a review. Int J Compos Mater. 2018;8(2):45–52. doi:10.5923/j.cmaterials.20180802.03.
  26. Reif J, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu ZZ, Koratkar N. Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposites at Low Graphene Content. ACS Nano. 2009;3(12):3884-3890. doi:10.1021/nn9010472
  27. Patel R, Sharma N. Influence of graphene on elongation and toughness of epoxy composites. Mater Res Express. 2022;9(2):025301. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ac0ea2.
  28. Kar A, Saikia D, Palanisamy S, Pandiarajan N. Effect of fiber loading on the mechanical, morphological, and dynamic mechanical characteristics of Calamus tenuis fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Vinyl Addit Technol. 2025;31(1):224–240.
Support