Journal of Polymer & Composites Review Article Special issue

A Systematic Review of Advanced Composite Materials for High-Performance Spur Gear Applications

  1. Rishikesh Hanmant Tike Department of Mechanical Engineering, Progressive Education Society's Modern College of Engineering, Shivajinagar, Pune
  2. Nitish Kumar Gautam Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Vidyanagri, Jhunjhunu
  3. Tarun Kumar Yadav Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babulal Tarabai Institute of Research & Technology, Sironja
  4. Swapnil Deokar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Smt. Kashibai Navale College of Engineering Vadgaon, Pune
  5. Ritesh Fegade Department of Mechanical Engineering, Parvatibai Genba Moze College of Engineering, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Wagholi, Pune
  6. Rupendra Nehete Department of Mechanical Engineering, SIES Graduate School of Technology, Nerul, Navi Mumbai
  7. Vithoba Tale Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rajarshi Shahu College of Engineering, Tathawade, Pune
  8. Ramakant Chaudhari Department of Mechanical Engineering, Padmashri Dr. V. B. Kolte College of Engineering, Malkapur
  9. Gitanjali Kale Department of First year Engineering, Dr. DY Patil Institute of Technology (DIT), Pimpri, Pune

Abstract

This is a review which provides specific and detailed information regarding the fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite to replace traditional steel in high-performance spur gears with emphasis on mechanical performance, computational modeling, and experimental validation. Methods: The current literature was thoroughly investigated that includes material properties, material simulation (e.g., finite element analysis, FEA), and experimental gear testing procedures (e.g., DIN 51354, ASTM G99). Certain case studies in the aerospace and automotive sectors were analyzed. Key Findings: Weight Reduction: Composite gears (e.g., CFRP, GF30-PEEK) are 30–50 percent lighter than steel gears, and CFRP has a specific strength of 3.46 GPa·cm³/g compared to 0.47 GPa·cm³/g of AISI 4340 steel—a 7.4 times improvement. Structural Performance: CFRP gears under a 50 Nm torque load, according to FEA simulations, have up to 40% less deformation (0.012 mm vs. 0.020 mm in steel) and 29% less stress concentration factors. Durability and Tribology: GF30-PEEK has a high wear resistance and lubricated wear rates as small as 1.8 × 10–6 mm³/Nm. CFRP gears exhibit high impact resistance and can resist 85 J/m Charpy impact, a factor 3 times higher than 25 J/m of nylon six six. Dynamic Behavior: The damping behavior of polymer composites decreases vibration by 15–20 dB and noise by 8 dB with natural frequencies that are 15% higher (CFRP: 2.8 kHz Steel: 2.4 kHz). Inference: FRP composite spur gears are a revolutionary solution to the power transmission systems and have considerable benefits in terms of weight reduction, life cycle, and sound abatement. The next steps to be undertaken in the field of work are multiscale wear modeling, AI-based optimization, and sustainable lifecycle management to allow wider application in the areas of electric mobility and aerospace, as well as advanced robotics.

Keywords

References (49)

  1. Utkarsh M Desai, Dhaval A Patel. Modeling And Stress Analysis Of Composite Material For Spur Gear Under Static Loading Condition. IJAPME. 2015;1(2):1–6.
  2. Gavali VA, Satav CP. Review paper on analysis of spur gear. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 2018;15(2):4–7.
  3. Rounak Mahakul, Dhirendra Nath Thatoi. Design and numerical analysis of spur gear using SolidWorks simulation technique. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;554:1–7.
  4. Miryam B Sánchez, Miguel Pleguezuelos. Calculation of tooth bending strength and surface durability of internal spur gear drives. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 2016;95:102–113.
  5. N Lenin Rakesh, V Palanisamy. SPUR Gear Analysis Using Finite Element Analysis. Middle–East Journal of Scientific Research. 2013;14(12):1763–1765.
  6. Samadhan M Lande, A D Desai. Stress Analysis of Polycarbonate Spur Gears for Sugarcane Juice Machine Using FEA. International Journal on Recent Technologies in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (IJRMEE). 2015;2(10):14–19.
  7. Ashish V Kadu, Sanjay S Deshmukh. Investigation Of Contact Stress In Spur Gear Using Lewis Equation And Finite Element Method. IJMERR. 2013;2(3):310–321.
  8. M Amarnath, C Sujatha. Experimental studies on the effects of reduction in gear tooth stiffness and lubricant film thickness in a spur geared system. Tribology International. 2009;42:340–352.
  9. Apparao D, Jagannadha Raju MV. Design and analysis of spur gear manufactured by DMLS process. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020;22(3):2716–2721.
  10. J G Carrillo, W J Cantwell. Scaling effects in the tensile behavior of fiber–metal laminates. Composites Science and Technology. 2007;67:1684–1693.
  11. Madhuri Deshpandea, Ramesh Gondil. Processing and Characterization of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Aluminium7075. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2018;5:7115–7122.
  12. Paolo Feraboli, Elof Peitso. Modulus Measurement for Prepreg–based Discontinuous Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Systems. Journal of Composite Materials. 2009;43(19):1947–1965.
  13. P Iaccarino, A Langella, G Caprino. A simplified model to predict the tensile and shear stress–strain behaviour of fibreglass/aluminium laminates. Composites Science and Technology. 2007;67:1784–1793.
  14. M Pramod Reddy. Spur Gear Tooth Stress Analysis And Stress Reduction Using Stress Reducing Geometrical Features. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET). 2015;6(9):17–29.
  15. Hanjun Jiang, Yimin Shao. Dynamic characteristics of helical gears under sliding friction with spalling defect. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2014;39:92–107.
  16. Xihui Liang, Hongsheng Zhang. The influence of tooth pitting on the mesh stiffness of a pair of external spur gears. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 2016;106:1–15.
  17. L Meng, Y Wan. Effects of geometric parameters on the failure behavior of mechanically fastened chopped carbon fiber tape reinforced thermoplastics. Composite Structures. 2019;229(111475):1–9.
  18. Soo–Jin Park. Roles of interfaces between carbon fibers and epoxy matrix on interlaminar fracture toughness of composites. Composite Interfaces. 2006;13(2–3):249–267.
  19. Marina Selezneva, Larry Lessard. Characterization of mechanical properties of randomly oriented strand thermoplastic composites. Journal of Composite Materials. 2015;0(0):1–19.
  20. Zhi Sun, J Jeyaraman. Processing and property of carbon–fiber aluminum–foam sandwich with aramidfiber composite adhesive joints. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2014;28(18):1835–1845.
  21. Evgeny Podzharov. Static and Dynamic Transmission Error in Spur Gears. The Open Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Journal. 2008;1:37–41.
  22. Yi Xiao, Wenjing Qiao. The effect of embedded devices on structural integrity of composite laminates. Composite Structures. 2016;153:21–29.
  23. Zhang M, Hou C. Interlocked graphene–Prussian blue hybrid composites for multifunctional electrochemical applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2017;87:941–947.
  24. J G Carrillo, W J Cantwell. Scaling effects in the tensile behavior of fiber–metal laminates. Composites Science and Technology. 2007;67:1684–1693.
  25. N Jiang, J P Novak. Fabrication and Characterization of Carbon–Aluminum Thermal Management Composites. 26th IEEE SEMI–THERM Symposium. 2010;:87–92.
  26. Hanjun Jiang, Yimin Shao. Dynamic characteristics of helical gears under sliding friction with spalling defect. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2014;39:92–107.
  27. José I Pedrero Izaskun I Vallejo. Calculation of Tooth Bending Strength and Surface Durability of High Transverse Contact Ratio Spur and Helical Gear Drives. Journal of Mechanical Design. 2007;129:69–75.
  28. C Qian, L T Harper. Notched behavior of discontinuous carbon fibre composites: Comparison with quasi–isotropic non–crimp fabric. Composites: Part A. 2011;42:293–302.
  29. Jiande Wang, Ian Howard. Finite Element Analysis of High Contact Ratio Spur Gears in Mesh. Journal of Tribology. 2005;127:471–484.
  30. Yi Wan, Jun Takahashi. Tensile properties and aspect ratio simulation of transversely isotropic discontinuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Composites Science and Technology. 2016;137:167–176.
  31. Feng K, Borghesani P. Vibration-based updating of wear prediction for spur gears. Wear. 2019;426–427:1414–1423.
  32. Feng Z. Application of regularization dimension to gear damage assessment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2010;24(4):1081–1098.
  33. Howard I, Jia S, Wang J. The dynamic modelling of gear systems and vibration-based fault detection. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2001;15(5):1081–1098.
  34. Božidar Rosić. Design And Simulation Of Meshing Of Internal Involute Spur Gears With Pinion Cutters. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS Series: Mechanical Engineering. 2002;1(9):1193–1198.
  35. Mohammed OD. Dynamic modelling of a one-stage spur gear system and vibration-based tooth crack detection analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2014;46(1–2):483–505.
  36. Huang Y, Ghezzo F. Onset of resin micro-cracks in unidirectional glass fiber laminates with integrated SHM sensors. Structural Health Monitoring. 2015;14(5):493–507
  37. Shan–shan Shi, Zhi Sun. Carbon–fiber and aluminum–honeycomb sandwich composites with and without Kevlar–fiber interfacial toughening. Composites: Part A. 2014;67:102–110.
  38. Zhi Sun, et al. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: mechanical and tribological behaviour. Polymers. 2023;15(7):1732–1745.
  39. Jiang N, Novak JP. Comparison of stress–strain behaviour of carbon fiber composites with conventional materials. Composite Structures. 2018;200:123–131.
  40. Fegade R, et al. Advanced machine learning models for early detection of helical gear faults. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). 2025;19(2):245–258.International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). 2025;19(2):245–258.
  41. Ritesh Fegade, et al. “Innovative Magnetic Coupling for Enhanced Safety in Grinding Machines”. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels. 2025;73(3):210-216
  42. ASTM D256 – 06. Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. 2006.
  43. Fegade R, Tated R, Nehete R. “Numerical investigation of pull in control of rectangular AA1050 rolling ingot through design of convex mould during direct chill casting process”. Engineering Research Express. 2024;6(1):1–15.
  44. Fegade R, Tated R, Nehete R. “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Effect of Melter Temperature and Casting Speed on Pull–In (Concavity) of AA1050 Ingot During Direct Chill Casting”. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C. 2024;105:69–79.
  45. Bledzki A K, Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose–based fibers. Progress in Polymer Science. 1999;24(2):221–274.
  46. ASTM D3039 – 08. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. 2008.
  47. Anuja H Karle, Srinidhi Campli, Vidya Zinjurde, Rishikesh Tike, Vrushali Gaikwad. “Multi–Response Optimisation of Wear Behaviour of Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Metallic and Ceramic Particles Using Taguchi–Grey Method”. Journal of Mines, Metals & Fuels. 2024;72(11):1271–1285.
  48. Rishikesh H Tike, V S Jatti, Nitishkumar Gautam. “A Review of Mechanical Properties of Composite Material Used to Manufacture Spur Gear”. JJTU Journal of Renewable Energy Exchange. 2025;13:167–173.
  49. Rishikesh H Tike, V S Jatti, Nitishkumar Gautam. “Metal Matrix Composite for Various Compositions of CF–Steel Materials and Their Mechanical Properties Using Taguchi Method”. JJTU Journal of Renewable Energy Exchange. 2024;12(4):444–453.
Support