Journal of Polymer & Composites Original Research

Polymer–Gel Composite Phase Change Materials: A Functional Polymer Composite Approach for Solar-Thermal Energy Storage in Building Facades

  1. M. Balaji Department of Mechanical Engineering, V R Siddhartha School of Engineering, Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education (Deemed to be University), Vijayawada
  2. K. Dilip Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering, Mylavaram
  3. Kiran A. Dongre Department of Electrical Engineering, Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management, Amravati
  4. Ajay Veludurthi Department of Mechanical Engineering, SV College of Engineering, Tirupati
  5. R. Sethuraman Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore
  6. Peyyala Pramod Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad
  7. Baddepudi Malathi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vidya Jyothi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad
  8. G. Nixon Samuel Vijayakumar Department of Physics, R. M. K. Engineering College, Kavaraipettai
  9. Zakir Hussain Department of Chemical Technology, Loyola Academy, Secunderabad

Abstract

This study investigates polymer–composite phase change materials (PCMs) in the form of polymer–gel hybrids as multifunctional systems for solar–thermal energy storage in building façades. Paraffin- and PEG-based PCMs were embedded into polyurethane and acrylic gel matrices to create shape-stabilized polymer–composites with high PCM loading (70–80 wt%). Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) confirmed distinct melting/freezing transitions at ~56°C (paraffin) and ~42°C (PEG), with enthalpy values of 120–150 J/g, closely matching theoretical predictions, thereby validating that the polymer–composite structure preserves latent heat without significant thermal losses. Thermal conductivity measurements demonstrated an enhancement from 0.37 W/m·K (bulk PCM) to 0.50 W/m·K (polymer–composite system), representing a ~35% improvement that is critical for rapid heat transfer in façade applications. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis revealed that the polymer–composites maintained a storage modulus (E′) above 450 MPa across the façade-relevant range (10–60°C), with damping factors below 0.15, confirming the mechanical resilience of the polymer–composite framework under repeated cycling. Leakage tests showed <1% mass loss after 20 thermal cycles, highlighting the efficiency of the crosslinked polymer–composite network acting as a three-dimensional molecular cage to immobilize PCMs and prevent seepage. Under solar-simulation at 800 W/m², façade panels integrated with the polymer–composite exhibited a reduction of peak surface temperatures by 7–9°C and stabilized core fluctuations within ±2°C, validating their effectiveness in thermal buffering. Durability evaluation over 1000 cycles demonstrated retention of ~90% latent heat capacity, 95% thermal conductivity, and 92% mechanical stiffness, confirming that the polymer–composite resists phase segregation, leakage, and mechanical fatigue far better than conventional PCM systems, which typically lose 20–40% capacity within 500 cycles. Collectively, these findings establish the polymer–composite approach as a durable, leakage-resistant, and thermally efficient solution for scalable facade integration, offering long-term stability, multifunctionality, and significant energy-saving potential in modern building systems.

Keywords

References (27)

  1. Zhu N, Li S, Hu P, Wei S, Deng R, Lei F. A review on applications of shape-stabilized phase change materials embedded in building enclosure in recent ten years. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;43:251-64.
  2. Souayfane F, Fardoun F, Biwole PH. Phase change materials (PCM) for cooling applications in buildings: A review. Energy Build. 2016;129:396-431.
  3. Jamekhorshid A, Sadrameli SM, Farid M. A review of microencapsulation methods of phase change materials (PCMs) as a thermal energy storage (TES) medium. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;31:531-42.
  4. Leong KY, Rahman MRA, Gurunathan BA. Nano-enhanced phase change materials: A review of thermo-physical properties, applications and challenges. J Energy Storage. 2019;21:18-31.
  5. Sharma A, Tyagi VV, Chen CR, Buddhi D. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13:318-45.
  6. Sarbu I, Sebarchievici C. A comprehensive review of thermal energy storage. Sustainability. 2018 Jan 14;10(1):191.
  7. Onder E, Sarier N, Cimen E. Encapsulation of phase change materials by complex coacervation to improve thermal performances of woven fabrics. Thermochim Acta. 2008;467:63-72.
  8. Konuklu Y, Ostry M, Paksoy HO, Charvat P. Review on using microencapsulated phase change materials (PCM) in building applications. Energy Build. 2015;106:134-55.
  9. Kenisarin MM, Kenisarina KM. Form-stable phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:1999-2040.
  10. Salunkhe PB, Shembekar PS. A review on effect of phase change material encapsulation on the thermal performance of a system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:5603-16.
  11. Sun D, Wang L. Utilization of paraffin/expanded perlite materials to improve mechanical and thermal properties of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater. 2015;101:791-6.
  12. Lin SC, Al-Kayiem HH. Evaluation of copper nanoparticles–paraffin wax compositions for solar thermal energy storage. Sol Energy. 2016;132:267-78.
  13. Liu YD, Zhou YG, Tong MW, Zhou XS. Experimental study of thermal conductivity and phase change performance of nanofluids PCMs. Microfluid Nanofluidics. 2009;7:579-84.
  14. Zhao M, Zhang X, Kong X. Preparation and characterization of a novel composite phase change material with double phase change points based on nanocapsules. Renew Energy. 2020;147:374-83.
  15. Reddy VJ, Ghazali MF, Kumarasamy S. Advancements in phase change materials for energy-efficient building construction: A comprehensive review. J Energy Storage. 2024;81:110494.
  16. Wang X, Li W, Luo Z, Wang K, Shah SP. A critical review on phase change materials (PCM) for sustainable and energy efficient building: design, characteristic, performance and application. Energy Build. 2022;260:111923.
  17. Milián YE, Gutiérrez A, Grágeda M, Ushak S. A review on encapsulation techniques for inorganic phase change materials and the influence on their thermophysical properties. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;73:983-99.
  18. Chandel SS, Agarwal T. Review of current state of research on energy storage, toxicity, health hazards and commercialization of phase changing materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;67:581-96.
  19. Dhaidan NS, Khodadadi JM. Melting and convection of phase change materials in different shape containers: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;43:449-77.
  20. Dash L, Mahanwar P. A review on organic phase change materials and their applications. Int J Eng Appl Sci Technol. 2021;5.
  21. Chung O, Jeong SG, Kim S. Preparation of energy efficient paraffinic PCMs/expanded vermiculite and perlite composites for energy saving in buildings. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2015;137:107-12.
  22. Kenisarin M, Mahkamov K. Solar energy storage using phase change materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2007;11:1913-62.
  23. Almeshaal M, Palanisamy S, Murugesan TM, Palaniappan M, Santulli C. Physico-chemical characterization of Grewia Monticola Sond (GMS) fibers for prospective application in biocomposites. Journal of Natural Fibers. 2022;19(17):15276-15290. doi:10.1080/15440478.2022.2123076
  24. Padmanabhan RG, Rajesh S, Karthikeyan S, Palanisamy S, Ilyas RA, Ayrilmis N, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties and Fick’s diffusion behaviour of aluminum-DMEM reinforced with hemp/bamboo/basalt woven fiber metal laminates (WFML) under different stacking sequences. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2024;15(7):102759. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2024.102759
  25. Palanisamy S, Kalimuthu M, Azeez A, Palaniappan M, Dharmalingam S, Nagarajan R, et al. Wear Properties and Post-Moisture Absorption Mechanical Behavior of Kenaf/Banana-Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites. Fibers. 2022;10(4):32. doi:10.3390/fib10040032
  26. Palaniappan M, Palanisamy S, Khan R, H.Alrasheedi N, Tadepalli S, Murugesan TM, et al. Synthesis and suitability characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from Citrus x sinensis sweet orange peel fruit waste-based biomass for polymer composite applications. Journal of Polymer Research. 2024;31(4). doi:10.1007/s10965-024-03946-0
  27. Goutham ERS, Hussain SS, Muthukumar C, Krishnasamy S, Kumar TSM, Santulli C, et al. Drilling Parameters and Post-Drilling Residual Tensile Properties of Natural-Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review. Journal of Composites Science. 2023;7(4):136. doi:10.3390/jcs7040136
Support