Journal of Nanoscience, NanoEngineering & Applications Original Research

Study of the Properties and Destructibility of the Native and Cross-Linked Potato Starch-Filled Polymer Composites for Food Packaging Applications

  1. Haydar U. Zaman Department of Physics, National University of Bangladesh and Institute of Radiation and Polymer Technology, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Savar

Abstract

Plastic is a vital component of modern life, commonly used in daily food packaging for its convenience and durability. Plastic marketing bags are manufactured from low-density polythene (LDPE) which causes ecological inconvenience as most of the plastic components are stored in waste and underground conditions for an elongated time. Plastic is a synthetic or semi-synthetic material that does not decompose naturally, and its primary drawback is its environmental impact, prompting ongoing efforts to accelerate its biodegradation. A material that must be eroded, developed for any cause, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as being buried in the ground, is interesting enough to be revealed. In this study, potato starch (PS) was blended with LDPE by using melt compound technique, Destructibility followed by injection molding for PS/LDPE composite formation. The influence of PS concentration and starch cross-linker sodium tripolyphosphate with the additive of composite properties was examined. Mechanical assessment outcomes exhibit that with increasing PS content there is an increase in loss of tensile strength and elongation at break of untreated and treated composites. Exposure to PS/LDPE composites in P. aeruginosa as well as soil environments was implemented to analyze the biodegradability of the composite. P. aeruginosa and the soil environment have lost weight and lost tensile properties due to increased PS and exposure periods, respectively. Modified PS composites also show less corrosion than unmodified PS/LDPE composites.

Keywords

References (36)

  1. Kyrikou I, Briassoulis D. Biodegradation of Agricultural Plastic Films: A Critical Review. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2007;15(2):125-150. doi:10.1007/s10924-007-0053-8
  2. Olivera S, Muralidhara HB, Venkatesh K, Guna VK, Gopalakrishna K, Kumar K. Y. Potential applications of cellulose and chitosan nanoparticles/composites in wastewater treatment: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;153:600-618. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.017
  3. Sajjadi M, Nasrollahzadeh M, Tahsili MR. Catalytic and antimicrobial activities of magnetic nanoparticles supported N-heterocyclic palladium(II) complex: A magnetically recyclable catalyst for the treatment of environmental contaminants in aqueous media. Separation and Purification Technology. 2019;227:115716. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115716
  4. Yusof YM, Kadir MFZ. Electrochemical characterizations and the effect of glycerol in biopolymer electrolytes based on methylcellulose-potato starch blend. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals. 2016;627(1):220-233. doi:10.1080/15421406.2015.1137115
  5. Ooi ZX, Ismail H, Bakar AA, Aziz NAA. Properties of the crosslinked plasticized biodegradable poly(vinyl alcohol)/rambutan skin waste flour blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2012;125(2):1127-1135. doi:10.1002/app.34860
  6. Zaman H, Beg MDH. Effect of filler starches on mechanical, thermal and degradation properties of low-density polyethylene composites. Prog Appl Sci Tech. 2021;11(2):26–36. doi:10.14456/past.2021.10.
  7. Zaman H, Beg MDH. Study on binary low-density polyethylene (LDPE)/thermoplastic sago starch (TPS) blend composites. Prog Appl Sci Tech. 2021;11(1):53–65. doi:10.14456/past.2021.5.
  8. Babu RP, O'Connor K, Seeram R. Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends. Progress in Biomaterials. 2013;2(1):8. doi:10.1186/2194-0517-2-8
  9. Zobel HF. Molecules to Granules: A Comprehensive Starch Review. Starch - Stärke. 1988;40(2):44-50. doi:10.1002/star.19880400203
  10. de Graaf RA, Karman AP, Janssen LPBM. Material Properties and Glass Transition Temperatures of Different Thermoplastic Starches After Extrusion Processing. Starch - Stärke. 2003;55(2):80-86. doi:10.1002/star.200390020
  11. Khan MA, Khan RA, Haydaruzzaman, Ghoshal S, Siddiky MNA, Saha M. Study on the Physico-Mechanical Properties of Starch-Treated Jute Yarn-Reinforced Polypropylene Composites: Effect of Gamma Radiation. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. 2009;48(5):542-548. doi:10.1080/03602550902824358
  12. Zaman HU, Khan MA, Khan RA. Physico-Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Banana Fiber/LDPE Composites: Effect of Acrylic Monomer and Starch. Composite Interfaces. 2011;18(8):685-700. doi:10.1163/156855412x626261
  13. Zhang C, Lim ST, Chung HJ. Physical modification of potato starch using mild heating and freezing with minor addition of gums. Food Hydrocolloids. 2019;94:294-303. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.03.027
  14. Alvani K, Qi X, Tester RF, Snape CE. Physico-chemical properties of potato starches. Food Chemistry. 2011;125(3):958-965. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.088
  15. Wootton M, Bamunuarachchi A. Water Binding Capacity of Commercial Produced Native and Modified Starches. Starch - Stärke. 1978;30(9):306-309. doi:10.1002/star.19780300905
  16. Wang J, Zhu H, Li S, Wang S, Wang S, Copeland L. Insights into structure and function of high pressure-modified starches with different crystalline polymorphs. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2017;102:414-424. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.042
  17. L.Q.a.C.S.W.S.m.a.a.F.C.C. Xie S X. Physical Properties, and Application ed S W Cui (Boca Raton: CRC Press) chapter 8 2005. pp. 357–390. (2005).
  18. Lim S, Seib P. Preparation and pasting properties of wheat and corn starch phosphates. Cereal Chem. 1993;70(2):137–137.
  19. Passauer L, Bender H, Fischer S. Synthesis and characterisation of starch phosphates. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2010;82(3):809-814. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.050
  20. Stahl JA, Lobato LP, Bochi VC, Kubota EH, Gutkoski LC, Emanuelli T. Physicochemical properties of Pinhão (Araucaria angustifolia, Bert, O. Ktze) starch phosphates. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2007;40(7):1206-1214. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2006.07.015
  21. Abed A, Assoul N, Ba M, Derkaoui SM, Portes P, Louedec L, et al. Influence of polysaccharide composition on the biocompatibility of pullulan/dextran‐based hydrogels. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2011;96A(3):535-542. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.33007
  22. Carbinatto FM, de Castro AD, Cury BSF, Magalhães A, Evangelista RC. Physical properties of pectin–high amylose starch mixtures cross-linked with sodium trimetaphosphate. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012;423(2):281-288. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.11.042
  23. Racksanti A, Janhom S, Punyanitya S, Watanesk R, Watanesk S. An approach for preparing an absorbable porous film of silk fibroin–rice starch modified with trisodium trimetaphosphate. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2014;132(8). doi:10.1002/app.41517
  24. Racksanti A, Janhom S, Punyanitya S, Watanesk R, Watanesk S. Crosslinking Density of Silk Fibroin – Rice Starch Hydrogels Modified with Trisodium Trimetaphosphate. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013;446-447:366-372. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.446-447.366" rel="nofollow">doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.446-447.366
  25. Chandra R. Biodegradable polymers. Progress in Polymer Science. 1998;23(7):1273-1335. doi:10.1016/s0079-6700(97)00039-7
  26. Zaman HU, Beg MDH. Biodegradable composites manufactured from low-density polyethylene and thermoplastic sago starch: Preparation and characterization. Prog Appl Sci Tech. 2021;11(2):42–49. doi:10.14456/past.2021.16.
  27. Chandra R, Rustgi R. Biodegradation of maleated linear low-density polyethylene and starch blends. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 1997;56(2):185-202. doi:10.1016/s0141-3910(96)00212-1
  28. Lee WJ, Youn YN, Yun YH, Yoon SD. Physical Properties of Chemically Modified Starch(RS4)/PVA Blend Films—Part 1. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2006;15(1):35-42. doi:10.1007/s10924-006-0040-5
  29. Obasi HC. Studies on biodegradability and mechanical properties of high-density polyethylene/corncob flour-based composites. IJSER. 2012;3(8):259–272.
  30. Febrianto F, Setyawati D, Karina M, Bakar ES, Hadi YS. Influence of Wood Flour and Modifier Contents on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wood Flour-Recycle Polypropylene Composites. Journal of Biological Sciences. 2006;6(2):337-343. doi:10.3923/jbs.2006.337.343
  31. Wang YJ, Liu W, Sun Z. Effects of glycerol and PE‐g‐MA on morphology, thermal and tensile properties of LDPE and rice starch blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2004;92(1):344-350. doi:10.1002/app.20015
  32. Gattin R, Copinet A, Bertrand C, Couturier Y. Biodegradation study of a coextruded starch and poly (lactic acid) material in various media. J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;88(3):825–831. doi:10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00039-2.
  33. Agamuthu P, Faizura PN. Biodegradability of degradable plastic waste. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. 2005;23(2):95-100. doi:10.1177/0734242x05051045
  34. Miltz J, Narkis M. The effect of ultraviolet radiation on chemically crosslinked low-density polyethylene. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 1976;20(6):1627-1633. doi:10.1002/app.1976.070200620
  35. Danjaji ID, Nawang R, Ishiaku US, Ismail H, Mohd Ishak ZAM. Degradation studies and moisture uptake of sago-starch-filled linear low-density polyethylene composites. Polymer Testing. 2002;21(1):75-81. doi:10.1016/s0142-9418(01)00051-4
  36. Orhan Y, Hrenović J, Büyükgüngör H. Biodegradation of plastic compost bags under controlled soil conditions. Acta Chim Slov. 2004;51:579–588.
Support