Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Case Study

Analyzing the Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction and Geometric Configuration on Structure

  1. Mahalangikar Neha P. Department of Applied Mechanics, Government College of Engineering Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar, Maharashtra, India
  2. R.S. Londhe Department of Applied Mechanics, Government College of Engineering Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

This study investigates how varying soil types impact the seismic performance of a 30-story building, simulated using ETABS software. The research focuses on key parameters such as soil type, different shapes of structure, base shear, and inter-story drifts under different soil conditions, ranging from soft clay to dense sand. By comparing fixed-base models with those incorporating soil-structure interaction (SSI), the analysis highlights significant differences influenced by soil type. The findings reveal that softer soils tend to amplify ground motion effects, resulting in higher displacements and inter-story drifts within the structure. In contrast, stiffer soils provide greater stability but may transmit higher forces to the building. These insights underscore the critical role of local soil conditions in structural behavior during seismic events. They emphasize the necessity of considering SSI and soil variability in the design and analysis of tall buildings to ensure their safety and performance under dynamic loads. In conclusion, integrating SSI into structural analysis proves essential for accurate seismic assessment and resilient design, particularly in regions with diverse geotechnical profiles. By understanding how different soil types interact with building structures, engineers can optimize designs to mitigate risks and enhance the overall seismic resilience of high-rise constructions.

Keywords

References (30)

  1. Nazarimofrad E, Zahrai SM. Seismic control of irregular multistory buildings using active tendons
  2. considering soil–structure interaction effect. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng. 2016; 89: 100–115.
  3. Lu Y, Hajirasouliha I, Marshall AM. Performance-based seismic design of flexible-base multistorey buildings considering soil–structure interaction. Eng Struct. 2016; 108: 90–103.
  4. Ghandil M, Behnamfar F. Ductility demands of MRF structures on soft soils considering soilstructure interaction. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng. 2017; 92: 203–214.
  5. Vicencio F, Alexander NA. Higher mode seismic structure-soil-structure interaction between
  6. adjacent building during earthquakes. Eng Struct. 2018; 174: 322–337.
  7. Elwi M, Muhammed B, Alhussiny N. Evaluation of soil-structure interaction for structures
  8. subjected to earthquake loading with different types of foundation. MATEC Web Conf. 2018; 162:
  9. Anand V, Satish Kumar SR. Seismic soil-structure interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Structures.
  10. 2018; 16: 317–326.
  11. Chen Q, Zhao Z, Zhang R, Pan C. Impact of soil structure interaction on structures with inerter
  12. system. J Sound Vibr. 2018; 433: 1–15.
  13. Han B, Chen S, Liang J. 2D dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction: a case study of Millikan
  14. Library Building. 2020; 113: 346–358.
  15. Vicencio F, Alexander NA. Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction in unsymmetrical plan
  16. buildings due to seismic excitation. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng. 2020; 113: 346–358.
  17. Scarfone R, Morigi M, Conti R. Assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects for tall
  18. buildings: a 3D numerical approach. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng. 2020; 128: 105864.
  19. Liu S, Li P, Zhang W, Lu Z. Experimental study and numerical simulation on dynamic soil-structure
  20. interaction under earthquake excitations. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng. 2020; 138: 106333.
  21. Dhadse GD, Ramtekkar G, Bhat G. Finite element modelling of soil structure intersection on system
  22. with interface: a review. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2021; 28: 3415–3432.
  23. Long H, Wang Z, Zhang C, Zhuang H, Chen W, Peng C. Nonlinear study on the structure-soilstructure interaction of seismic response among high-rise buildings. Eng Struct. 2021; 242: 112550.
  24. Requena-Garcia-Cruz MV, Bento R, Durand-Neyra P, Morales-Esteban A. Analysis of the soil
  25. structure-interaction effects on the seismic vulnerability of mid-rise RC buildings in Lisbon.
  26. Structures. 2022; 38: 599–617.
  27. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
  28. Structures. Sixth Revision. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2021.
  29. Bureau of Indian Standards. IS 16700-2017, Criteria for Structural Safety of Tall Buildings. New
  30. Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2018.
Support