International Journal of Toxins and Toxics Review Article

Review on the Effects of Chemical Compounds Toxicity on Workers in Chemical Laboratories.

  1. Nagham Mahmood Department of Chemistry, Education College for Girls., University of Kufa
  2. Sabrean Farhan Jawad College of pharmacy, Al- Mustaqbal University

Abstract

Chemical laboratories are considered high-risk work environments due to the wide range of chemicals that workers handle, which may be toxic, corrosive, or flammable. Improper handling of these substances can lead to serious health problems, ranging from mild irritation to death in cases of exposure to chemical compounds such as phenols and amines, which cause various types of lung and laryngeal cancers and respiratory diseases in laboratory workers who are in direct contact with hazardous laboratory materials. Inhaling the fumes of some gaseous substances can lead to pneumonia, chronic bronchial allergies, and difficulty breathing. Some chemicals are irritants to the respiratory membranes and skin, causing short-term symptoms upon exposure, such as inflammation, rashes, redness, allergic reactions, bleeding, or coughing. These symptoms can affect the skin, eyes, and respiratory system. Irritants also damage the ozone layer and thus pose a risk to public health. Examples include chlorine, ammonia, sulfur dioxide, poison ivy, chromic acid, and nickel chloride. There are organic compounds that cause skin erosion or skin irritation upon contact; these are known as corrosive substances. These chemicals lead to the erosion or destruction of the part they come into contact with, such as skin, which can suffer severe burns and tissue damage if exposed to any of these substances. Examples of corrosive substances include sodium hydroxide, acetic acid, hydrochloric acid, bromine, and perchloric acid. From all of this, we can conclude that chemical hazards in the workplace, whether in a laboratory or a chemical plant, are threats arising from the presence of chemicals that may cause health and environmental damage, such as fires and explosions, and expose workers to harm such as irritation, burns, and respiratory distress. Types of chemical hazards include flammable, irritant, carcinogenic, explosive, toxic, and other substances. To avoid these hazards, employees must be educated, protective equipment provided, safety labels used, and materials stored correctly.

Keywords

References (70)

  1. Rathna R, Varjani S, Nakkeeran E. Recent developments and prospects of dioxins and furans remediation. Journal
  2. of environmental management. 2018 Oct 1;223:797-806.
  3. Atashgahi S, Shetty SA, Smidt H, De Vos WM. Flux, impact, and fate of halogenated xenobiotic compounds in the
  4. gut. Frontiers in physiology. 2018 Jul 10;9:888.
  5. Liu L, Liu M, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Wu L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Zou D, Su X. The role of hydroxyl group of
  6. ethanol in the self-assembly of pharmaceutical cocrystal of myricetin with 4, 4′-bipyridine. Journal of Molecular
  7. Structure. 2022 Feb 15;1250:131848.
  8. Masse RK, Glassy BA, Spores RA, Vuong AT, Zhu Z, Pourpoint TL. Hydrazine-Based Green Monopropellant
  9. Blends. InAIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum 2024 (p. 1619).
  10. Liu L, Liu M, Zhang Y, Yin H, Su X, Zhang Q, Feng Y, Guo Y, Zou D, Liu Y. The role of 3-OH in the self-
  11. assembly of pharmaceutical cocrystals of dihydroflavonol with 4, 4′-bipyridine. New Journal of Chemistry.
  12. 2021;45(3):1626-33.
  13. Alsabri IK, Abdullabass HK, Aljamali NM. Invention of (Gluta. Sulfazane-Cefixime) Compounds as Inhibitors of
  14. Cancerous Tumors. Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2020;11(2):44-55.
  15. Aljamali NM. Synthesis of Antifungal Chemical Compounds from Fluconazole with (Pharma-Chemical) Studying.
  16. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and chemical sciences. 2017 May 1;8(3):564-73.
  17. Okey AB. An aryl hydrocarbon receptor odyssey to the shores of toxicology: the Deichmann Lecture, International
  18. Congress of Toxicology-XI. Toxicological Sciences. 2007 Jul 1;98(1):5-38.
  19. Tijet N, Boutros PC, Moffat ID, Okey AB, Tuomisto J, Pohjanvirta R. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates distinct
  20. dioxin-dependent and dioxin-independent gene batteries. Molecular pharmacology. 2006 Jan 1;69(1):140-53.
  21. Aljamali NM. Synthesis and biological study of hetero (atoms and cycles) compounds. Der Pharma Chemica.
  22. 2016;8(6):40-8.
  23. Abdullabass HK, Jawad AM, Aljamali NM. SYNTHESIS OF DRUG DERIVATIVES AS INHIBITORS OF
  24. CANCEROUS CELLS. Biochemical & Cellular Archives. 2020 Oct 1;20(2).
  25. Bahloul A, Benayahoum A, Bouakkaz S, Bordjiba T, Boudjahem AG, Amirouche S, Zoukel A, Cherif NF,
  26. Boudriche L, Bachari K. Microwave-assisted one-pot synthesis of Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles for enhanced catalytic
  27. degradation of organic dyes. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2026 Feb 15;444:129191.
  28. Jawad AM, Aljamali NM, Jwad SM, MJ A, MJ S. Development and preparation of ciprofloxacin drug derivatives
  29. for treatment of microbial contamination in hospitals and environment. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine &
  30. Toxicology. 2020 Apr 1;14(2):1115-22.
  31. Devi J, Yadav M, Jindal DK, Kumar D, Poornachandra Y. Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, biological
  32. screening and in vitro cytotoxic studies of 4‐methyl‐3‐thiosemicarbazone derived Schiff bases and their Co (II),
  33. Ni (II), Cu (II) and Zn (II) complexes. Applied Organometallic Chemistry. 2019 Oct;33(10):e5154.
  34. Yu P, Deng J, Cai J, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Hamid Khan M, Liang H, Yang F. Anticancer and biological properties of a
  35. Zn-2, 6-diacetylpyridine bis (thiosemicarbazone) complex. Metallomics. 2019 Aug;11(8):1372-86.
  36. Dakshayani K, Lingappa Y, Sayaji Rao MN. DK: Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Activity of 5-Methyl,
  37. Thiophene− 2-Carboxaldehyde Derivatives of Copper (II), Cobalt (II) and Nickel (II) Complexes. Res Pap Int J
  38. Chem Pharm Sci. 2012;3:50-5.
  39. Al-Hawarin JI, Abu-Yamin AA, Abu-Saleh AA, Saraireh IA, Almatarneh MH, Hasan M, Atrooz OM, Al-Douri Y.
  40. Synthesis, characterization, and DFT calculations of a new sulfamethoxazole schiff base and its metal complexes.
  41. Materials. 2023 Jul 21;16(14):5160.
  42. d’Alnoncourt RN, Csepei LI, Hävecker M, Girgsdies F, Schuster ME, Schlögl R, Trunschke A. The reaction
  43. network in propane oxidation over phase-pure MoVTeNb M1 oxide catalysts. Journal of catalysis. 2014 Mar
  44. 1;311:369-85.
  45. Aljamali NM, Ghafil RA, Jaafer NS, Neamah MT. Construction of Chalcone–Thiadiazole Derivatives with
  46. (Spectral and Anticancer)-Study. Science. 2025;16:03.
  47. Nurman DG, Karim AK, Akhnazarov SK, Mukashev ST, Demissenov OM. Current issues of molecular diagnostics
  48. of bladder cancer. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;5(3):286-301.
  49. Wannas FA, Husien NS, Kadhium AJ, Aljamali NM. Synthesis of New Reagents as a ligands and Study of
  50. (Investigation, Chromatographic Behavior, Solubility). European Journal of Molecular & Clinical
  51. Medicine.;7(02):2020.
  52. Denison MS, Nagy SR. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and
  53. endogenous chemicals. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2003 Apr;43(1):309-34.
  54. Mubarak AK, Alkhefaji DQ, Radhi AW. In silico study, design, synthesis, and evaluation of anti-neoplastic activity
  55. of hybrid natural antioxidants as histone deacetylase inhibitors. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2025 Dec
  56. 30;2025(12):2685-97.
  57. Connor KT, Harris MA, Edwards MR, Budinsky RA, Clark GC, Chu AC, Finley BL, Rowlands JC. AH receptor
  58. agonist activity in human blood measured with a cell-based bioassay: evidence for naturally occurring AH receptor
  59. ligands in vivo. Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. 2008 Jul;18(4):369-80.
  60. Lindén J, Lensu S, Tuomisto J, Pohjanvirta R. Dioxins, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and the central regulation of
  61. energy balance. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. 2010 Oct 1;31(4):452-78.
  62. Pohjanvirta R. The AH receptor in biology and toxicology. John Wiley & Sons; 2011 Nov 3.
  63. Jawad AM, Aljamali NM, Aseel MJ. Innovation, preparation of cephalexin drug derivatives and studying of
  64. (toxicity & resistance of infection). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. 2020;24(04):3754-67.
  65. Hahn ME, Karchner SI. Structural and functional diversification of AHRs during metazoan evolution. The AH
  66. Receptor in Biology and Toxicology. 2012:389-403.
  67. Bock KW. Human and rodent aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR): from mediator of dioxin toxicity to physiologic
  68. AHR functions and therapeutic options. Biological chemistry. 2017 Apr 1;398(4):455-64.
  69. Poellinger L. Mechanistic aspects the dioxin (aryl hydrocarbon) receptor. Food Additives & Contaminants. 2000
  70. Apr 1;17(4):261-6.