Recent Trends in Sports Original Research
A Comparative Study on Calisthenics Exercises and Weight Training for Beginners of 20 – 25 Years Male
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the effects of calisthenics training and weight training on beginners. Research suggests that both training methods are used to improve physical fitness, strength, endurance, and overall functional performance, but their impact on beginners varies depending on training structure, progression, and movement demands. The observations were conducted and the ratings in terms of the performance were developed in the form of 5-point scale. Therefore, both of them proved to be rather efficient in case of beginners. The choice of the training methods should be based on personal goals and level of physical condition, because according to the results of the study, the group of calisthenics achieved higher mean rating (4.33/5), while weight training group had lower one (3.33/5), owing to better balance and coordination skills. At the same time, it should be noted that weight training group got a rating for strength (4/5) while calisthenics group got 3/5 rating. A total of 4 subjects were involved in this study however; they were further divided into 2 each for calisthenics training group and weight training group. 3 gym trainers were consulted and finalized the structured training program which consists of calisthenics and weight training was conducted over a period of eleven weeks, with progressive overload, proper recovery, and safety considerations. Various physical components such as muscular strength, endurance, balance, coordination, and body control were developed gradually throughout the training period.
Keywords
References (16)
- Wagner DR. ACSM’s resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2005 Nov;37(11):2018.
- Sands WA, Wurth JJ, Hewit JK. Basics of strength and conditioning manual. Colorado Springs, CO: National Strength and Conditioning Association. 2012;1:100-4.
- Afonso J, Nikolaidis PT, Sousa P, Mesquita I. Is empirical research on periodization trustworthy? A comprehensive review of conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):27.
- Boyle M. New functional training for sports. Human Kinetics; 2016 May 18. DOI:5040/9781718225718
- Lally P, Gardner B. Promoting habit formation. Health psychology review. 2013 May 1;7(sup1):S137-58.
- Tsourlou T, Gerodimos V, Kellis E, Stavropoulos N, Kellis S. The effects of a calisthenics and a light strength training program on lower limb muscle strength and body composition in mature women. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2003 Aug;17(3):590-8.
- Igor R, Vladimir I. Modalities of training parameter alternation in nowadays strength training practice. Citius Altius Fortius. 2010 Dec 1;29(4):41.
- Nemoto N. A Constructional Analysis of Bodily Motion Expressions. English Linguistics. 2007;24(2):389-420.
- Guy JA, Micheli LJ. Strength training for children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2001 Jan;9(1):29-36.
- Herzog W. Skeletal muscle mechanics: questions, problems and possible solutions. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2017 Sep 16;14(1):98.
- Cook CJ, Kilduff LP, Jones MR, Joyce D, Lewindon D. Recovering effectively in high-performance sports. High-performance training for sports. 2014 Jul 15:319-30.
- Gabriel BM, Zierath JR. The limits of exercise physiology: from performance to health. Cell metabolism. 2017 May 2;25(5):1000-11.
- Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the hip: a focus on muscular actions. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2010 Feb;40(2):82-94.
- Greer J. Training: The foundation for success in combat. Heritage Foundation. 2018 Oct;4:37-45.
- Renson R. Kinesiologists: raiders of the lost paradigm?. Kinesiology. 2002 Dec 18;34(2.):210-21.
- DiNubile NA. Strength training. Clinics in sports medicine. 1991 Jan 1;10(1):33-62.