STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Recent Trends in Civil Engineering & Technology Original Research

Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Optimizing Polyhouse Roof Truss Design

  1. Deepak Kulyal
  2. V.K. Verma
  3. Aman Kumar

Abstract

Polyhouses are specialised agricultural structures developed to maintain controlled environmental conditions for crop cultivation, thereby ensuring consistent productivity even under adverse climatic circumstances. The performance of these systems largely relies on the structural stability and cost efficiency of the roof truss, which must achieve an effective balance between strength, adaptability, and economy. In this research, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based modelling framework is introduced to optimise the members of polyhouse roof trusses, offering a computationally intelligent solution aligned with current advancements in innovative materials and infrastructure technologies. A total of 340 truss models, incorporating different load combinations, geometric parameters, and purlin spacings, were evaluated using STAAD.PRO software. The generated dataset was subsequently used to train and validate the ANN model for predicting the most economical pipe cross-sections of truss members under varying loading conditions. The results indicate that the ANN-based approach considerably reduces prediction errors and computational effort compared with traditional design methodologies. Overall, the proposed framework provides a structured, data-oriented strategy for optimising polyhouse roof truss systems. This method improves design precision and efficiency while supporting sustainable and technologically progressive construction practices in agricultural infrastructure.

Keywords

References (32)

  1. Amir, H. M., & Hasegawa, T. 1988. Greenhouse structure design optimization. J. Irrig. Eng. Rural
  2. Plan, (14): 33–52.
  3. Choi, Yun, and Yoon. 2014. Survey Analysis of the Characteristics of Greenhouses in Korea– Int.
  4. J. Environ. Rural Dev, 5–1.
  5. Farooq, F., Amin, N. M., Khan, K., Sadiq, R. M., Javed, M. F., Aslam, F. and Alyousef, R. 2020.
  6. A comparative study of random forest and genetic engineering programming for the prediction of
  7. compressive strength of high strength concrete (HSC). Appl. Sci., 10(20): 1–18.
  8. Gao, Y., & Yang, X. 2021. Research on Deep Convolutional Neural Network in Damage
  9. Identification of Truss Structure. ‘In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
  10. (LIMIT-2021 in June). pp. 12–33.
  11. Ghani, S., Bakochristou, F., ElBialy, E. M. A. A., Gamaledin, S. M. A., Rashwan, M. M.,
  12. Abdelhalim, A. M., & Ismail, S. M. (2019). Design challenges of agricultural greenhouses in hot
  13. and arid environments A review. EAEF, 12(1), 48–70.
  14. Gupta, D., Santosh, D. T., Debnath, S., Maitra, S., & Gaikwad, D. 2020. Modeling and simulation
  15. application for greenhouse microclimatic studies and structural analysis. PCSA, 300–312.
  16. IS:1161. 1998. “Steel tubes for structural purposes”, New Delhi, India.
  17. IS:14462. 1997. “Recommendations for stack sampling for particulate matter determination
  18. including safety requirements”, New Delhi, India.
  19. IS:800. 2007. General construction in steel - Code of practice. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian
  20. Standards, New Delhi, India.
  21. IS:875, Part 1. 2015. Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Dead Load on Buildings and
  22. Structures, Second Revision, New Delhi, India.
  23. IS:875, Part 2. 2015. Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Live Load on Buildings and
  24. Structures, Second Revision, New Delhi, India.
  25. IS:875, Part 3. 2015. Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Wind Load on Buildings and
  26. Structures, Second Revision, New Delhi, India.
  27. Kalyanshetti, M. G., & Mirajkar, G. S. 2012. Comparison between conventional steel structures
  28. and tubular steel structures. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., 2(6), 1460–1464.
  29. Kendirli, B. 2006. Structural analysis of greenhouses: A case study in Turkey. Build. Environ,
  30. 41(7), 864–871.
  31. Krishna, D. A., Priyadarsini, R. S. and Narayanan, S. 2021. High temperature effects on different
  32. grades of concrete. Sadhana, 46(1): 1–12.
Support