STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Research and Reviews: A Journal of Microbiology and Virology Review Article

Enhancing Fiber Digestibility in Dairy Cows: Influence of Dietary, Management, and Environmental Factors

  1. Md. Emran Hossain Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi

Abstract

The digestibility of fiber in dairy cows is a critical factor for optimizing their nutritional efficiency and overall productivity. This study explores the key dietary, management, and environmental factors influencing fiber digestibility in the rumen. Various aspects of feed composition, such as fiber content, protein-to-fiber ratio, and the presence of anti-nutritional factors, play a significant role in determining microbial activity and rumen fermentation efficiency. Physical feed characteristics, including particle size, feed processing methods, and forage maturity, further influence the breakdown of fiber. Environmental factors, such as ambient temperature, humidity, and heat stress, can disrupt rumen function and reduce microbial efficiency, negatively impacting fiber digestion. In addition, management practices such as feed mixing efficiency, stocking density, and access to quality pasture are essential for maintaining optimal rumen conditions and supporting effective fiber utilization. The study also highlights the importance of microbial diversity and the presence of specific microbial populations, including fibrolytic bacteria, in enhancing fiber digestion. Effective use of dietary interventions such as enzyme supplementation, ionophores, and prebiotics can further improve fiber digestibility. By understanding the interplay of these factors, this review provides insights into strategies for enhancing fiber digestion, which is essential for improving feed efficiency, animal health, and sustainable dairy farming practices.

Keywords

References (63)

  1. Zebeli Q, Aschenbach JR, Tafaj M, Boguhn J, Ametaj BN, Drochner W. Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95(3):1041-1056. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4421
  2. Zhao XH, Zhang T, Xu M, Yao JH. Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility in goats1. Journal of Animal Science. 2011;89(2):501-509. doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3013
  3. Galyean ML, Goetsch AL. Utilization of Forage Fiber by Ruminants. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books. 1993:33-71. doi:10.2134/1993.foragecellwall.c2
  4. Fustini M, Palmonari A, Canestrari G, Bonfante E, Mammi L, Pacchioli MT, et al. Effect of undigested neutral detergent fiber content of alfalfa hay on lactating dairy cows: Feeding behavior, fiber digestibility, and lactation performance. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017;100(6):4475-4483. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-12266
  5. Shi R, Dong S, Mao J, Wang J, Cao Z, Wang Y, et al. Dietary Neutral Detergent Fiber Levels Impacting Dairy Cows’ Feeding Behavior, Rumen Fermentation, and Production Performance during the Period of Peak-Lactation. Animals. 2023;13(18):2876. doi:10.3390/ani13182876
  6. Beane KE, Redding MC, Wang X, Pan JH, Le B, Cicalo C, et al. Effects of dietary fibers, micronutrients, and phytonutrients on gut microbiome: a review. Applied Biological Chemistry. 2021;64(1). doi:10.1186/s13765-021-00605-6
  7. Cavallini, A. Concolino, L. Mammi, and ..., “Factors influencing fiber digestibility in dairy cows,” J. Dairy …, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://cris.unibo.it/handle/11585/804412%0Ahttps://cris.unibo.it/bitstream/11585/804412/2/PIIS002203022030816X.pdf
  8. D. Aschalew et al., “Effects of physically effective fiber on rumen and milk parameters in dairy cows: A review,” Indian J. Anim. Res., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1317–1323, 2020, doi:10.18805/ijar.B-1104.
  9. Zhao Y, Xie B, Gao J, Zhao G. Dietary Supplementation with Sodium Sulfate Improves Rumen Fermentation, Fiber Digestibility, and the Plasma Metabolome through Modulation of Rumen Bacterial Communities in Steers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2020;86(22). doi:10.1128/aem.01412-20
  10. Makki K, Deehan EC, Walter J, Bäckhed F. The Impact of Dietary Fiber on Gut Microbiota in Host Health and Disease. Cell Host & Microbe. 2018;23(6):705-715. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.012
  11. Korcz E, Kerényi Z, Varga L. Dietary fibers, prebiotics, and exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: potential health benefits with special regard to cholesterol-lowering effects. Food & Function. 2018;9(6):3057-3068. doi:10.1039/c8fo00118a
  12. Oldick BS, Firkins JL. Effects of degree of fat saturation on fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis when diets are fed twelve times daily. Journal of Animal Science. 2000;78(9):2412. doi:10.2527/2000.7892412x
  13. Tamminga S. Influence of Feeding Management on Ruminant Fiber Digestibility. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books. 1993:571-602. doi:10.2134/1993.foragecellwall.c22
  14. Chen H, Wang C, Huasai S, Chen A. Effects of dietary forage to concentrate ratio on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and rumen bacterial composition in Angus cows. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96580-5
  15. Yang K, Wei C, Zhao GY, Xu ZW, Lin SX. Effects of dietary supplementing tannic acid in the ration of beef cattle on rumen fermentation, methane emission, microbial flora and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2016;101(2):302-310. doi:10.1111/jpn.12531
  16. Huhtanen P, Rinne M, Nousiainen J. A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 2. The effects of feeding level and diet composition on digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92(10):5031-5042. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1834
  17. Oba M, Allen MS. Evaluation of the Importance of the Digestibility of Neutral Detergent Fiber from Forage: Effects on Dry Matter Intake and Milk Yield of Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 1999;82(3):589-596. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75271-9
  18. Hendawy AO, Sugimura S, Sato K, Mansour MM, Abd El-Aziz AH, Samir H, et al. Effects of Selenium Supplementation on Rumen Microbiota, Rumen Fermentation, and Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Ruminant Animals: A Review. Fermentation. 2021;8(1):4. doi:10.3390/fermentation8010004
  19. Brask M, Lund P, Hellwing ALF, Poulsen M, Weisbjerg MR. Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2013;184(1-4):67-79. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.06.006
  20. Wang Y, Xia K, Wang XN, Lin X, Liu J, Li YJ, et al. Improvement of feed intake, digestibility, plasma metabolites, and lactation performance of dairy cows fed mixed silage of sugar beet pulp and rice straw inoculated with lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science. 2022;105(1):269-280. doi:10.3168/jds.2021-20494
  21. Yang L, Zhang L, Zhang P, Zhou Y, Huang X, Yan Q, et al. Alterations in nutrient digestibility and performance of heat-stressed dairy cows by dietary L-theanine supplementation. Animal Nutrition. 2022;11:350-358. doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2022.08.002
  22. Mousa GA, Allak MA, Shehata MG, Hashem NM, Hassan OGA. Dietary Supplementation with a Combination of Fibrolytic Enzymes and Probiotics Improves Digestibility, Growth Performance, Blood Metabolites, and Economics of Fattening Lambs. Animals. 2022;12(4):476. doi:10.3390/ani12040476
  23. Grossi S, Compiani R, Rossi L, Dell’Anno M, Castillo I, Sgoifo Rossi CA. Effect of Slow-Release Urea Administration on Production Performance, Health Status, Diet Digestibility, and Environmental Sustainability in Lactating Dairy Cows. Animals. 2021;11(8):2405. doi:10.3390/ani11082405
  24. Hassanat F, Benchaar C. Corn silage-based diet supplemented with increasing amounts of linseed oil: Effects on methane production, rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, and milk production of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2021;104(5):5375-5390. doi:10.3168/jds.2020-18853
  25. REHMAN A, ARIF M, SAEED M, MANAN A, AL-SAGHEER A, EL-HACK MEA, et al. Nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, and milk production of mid-lactation Jersey × Friesian cows fed diets containing different proportions of rumen-undegradable protein. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2020;92(suppl1). doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020180787
  26. Hassanat F, Gervais R, Benchaar C. Methane production, ruminal fermentation characteristics, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion, and milk production of dairy cows fed conventional or brown midrib corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 2017;100(4):2625-2636. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11862
  27. Shakira, M. Qubtia, I. Ahmed, F. Hasan, M. I. Anjum, and M. Imran, “Effect of indigenously isolated saccharomyces cerevisiae probiotics on milk production, nutrient digestibility, blood chemistry and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows,” 2018, thejaps.org.pk. [Online]. Available: http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/Accepted/2007/28-2/10.pdf
  28. Huhtanen P, Rinne M, Nousiainen J. A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 2. The effects of feeding level and diet composition on digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92(10):5031-5042. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1834
  29. Bernabucci U, Lacetera N, Danieli PP, Bani P, Nardone A, Ronchi B. Influence of different periods of exposure to hot environment on rumen function and diet digestibility in sheep. International Journal of Biometeorology. 2009;53(5):387-395. doi:10.1007/s00484-009-0223-6
  30. Moallem U, Lehrer H, Livshitz L, Zachut M, Yakoby S. The effects of live yeast supplementation to dairy cows during the hot season on production, feed efficiency, and digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92(1):343-351. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0839
  31. Sánchez NR, Ledin I. Effect of feeding different levels of foliage from Cratylia argentea to creole dairy cows on intake, digestibility, milk production and milk composition. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2006;38(4):343-351. doi:10.1007/s11250-006-4314-7
  32. Sales J, Janssens G. Acid-insoluble ash as a marker in digestibility studies: a review. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 2003;12(3):383-401. doi:10.22358/jafs/67718/2003
  33. Chow LO, Baron VS, Corbett R, Oba M. Effects of Planting Date on Fiber Digestibility of Whole-Crop Barley and Productivity of Lactating Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2008;91(4):1534-1543. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0854
  34. Morsy AS, Soltan YA, El-Zaiat HM, Alencar SM, Abdalla AL. Bee propolis extract as a phytogenic feed additive to enhance diet digestibility, rumen microbial biosynthesis, mitigating methane formation and health status of late pregnant ewes. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2021;273:114834. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114834
  35. Zebeli Q, Tafaj M, Weber I, Dijkstra J, Steingass H, Drochner W. Effects of Varying Dietary Forage Particle Size in Two Concentrate Levels on Chewing Activity, Ruminal Mat Characteristics, and Passage in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007;90(4):1929-1942. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-354
  36. Maulfair DD, Fustini M, Heinrichs AJ. Effect of varying total mixed ration particle size on rumen digesta and fecal particle size and digestibility in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2011;94(7):3527-3536. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3718
  37. Evangelista C, Petrocchi Jasinski F, Basiricò L, Turriziani G, Bernabucci U. Particle size distribution of total mixed rations fed to Italian Mediterranean buffaloes measured by the PSPS: impact on milk quality and digestibility. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2024;23(1):1535-1550. doi:10.1080/1828051x.2024.2417714
  38. Miller-Cushon EK, DeVries TJ. Effect of dietary dry matter concentration on the sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows fed a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92(7):3292-3298. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1772
  39. Abulaiti A, Ahsan U, Naseer Z, Ahmed Z, Liu W, Ruan C, et al. Effect of dietary Chinese herbal preparation on dry matter intake, milk yield and milk composition, serum biochemistry, hematological profile, and reproductive efficiency of Holstein dairy cows in early postpartum period. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2024;11. doi:10.3389/fvets.2024.1434548
  40. Ncisana L, Mabhaudhi T, Mkhize NR, Ravhuhali K, Tjelele TJ, Nyathi MK, et al. Water regimes in selected fodder radish (Raphanus sativus) genotypes: Effects on nutritional value and in vitro ruminal dry matter degradability. Heliyon. 2024;10(8):e29203. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29203
  41. Ahmad, M. Jamil, S. Ullah, and M. Ali, “Examine the Effects of Climate Change on Forage Quality and its Subsequent Impact on Milk Yield and Composition,” Indus J. …, 2024, [Online]. Available: http://induspublishers.com/IJBR/article/view/431
  42. Zhou L, Raza SHA, Han L, Ma B, Althobaiti F, Kesba H, et al. Effects of dietary concentrate: forage ratio on development of gastrointestinal tract in black Tibetan sheep. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 2022;50(1):192-197. doi:10.1080/09712119.2022.2053131
  43. Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA. Increasing physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets through forage proportion versus forage chop length: Chewing and ruminal pH. Journal of Dairy Science. 2009;92(4):1603-1615. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1379
  44. AlZahal O, Dionissopoulos L, Laarman AH, Walker N, McBride BW. Active dry Saccharomyces cerevisiae can alleviate the effect of subacute ruminal acidosis in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2014;97(12):7751-7763. doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8212
  45. Xu Q, Qiao Q, Gao Y, Hou J, Hu M, Du Y, et al. Gut Microbiota and Their Role in Health and Metabolic Disease of Dairy Cow. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2021;8. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.701511
  46. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Walker ND, Bach A. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008;145(1-4):5-26. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019
  47. Anadón A, Ares I, Martínez-Larrañaga MR, Martínez MA. Prebiotics and Probiotics in Feed and Animal Health. Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine. 2019:261-285. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04624-8_19
  48. Nova E, Gómez-Martinez S, González-Soltero R. The Influence of Dietary Factors on the Gut Microbiota. Microorganisms. 2022;10(7):1368. doi:10.3390/microorganisms10071368
  49. Wu S, Bhat Z, Gounder R, Mohamed Ahmed I, Al-Juhaimi F, Ding Y, et al. Effect of Dietary Protein and Processing on Gut Microbiota—A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2022;14(3):453. doi:10.3390/nu14030453
  50. Kumar Singh A, Cabral C, Kumar R, Ganguly R, Kumar Rana H, Gupta A, et al. Beneficial Effects of Dietary Polyphenols on Gut Microbiota and Strategies to Improve Delivery Efficiency. Nutrients. 2019;11(9):2216. doi:10.3390/nu11092216
  51. Uyeno Y, Shigemori S, Shimosato T. Effect of Probiotics/Prebiotics on Cattle Health and Productivity. Microbes and environments. 2015;30(2):126-132. doi:10.1264/jsme2.me14176
  52. Rojas OJ, Stein HH. Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2017;8(1). doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0177-1
  53. Wanapat M, Polyorach S, Boonnop K, Mapato C, Cherdthong A. Effects of treating rice straw with urea or urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows. Livestock Science. 2009;125(2-3):238-243. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.05.001
  54. Dehghan-banadaky M, Corbett R, Oba M. Effects of barley grain processing on productivity of cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2007;137(1-2):1-24. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.021
  55. Zoabi H, Ammar H, Ghzayel S, Aziz BA, Kholif AE, Díaz A, et al. Feeding Sodium Hydroxide-Treated Almond Hulls to Assaf Sheep: Effects on Chemical Composition, Nutrient Digestibility, and Zootechnical Performance. Agriculture. 2025;15(9):1000. doi:10.3390/agriculture15091000
  56. Giallongo F, Hristov AN, Oh J, Frederick T, Weeks H, Werner J, et al. Effects of slow-release urea and rumen-protected methionine and histidine on performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2015;98(5):3292-3308. doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8791
  57. Varga GA, Kolver ES. Microbial and Animal Limitations to Fiber Digestion and Utilization. The Journal of Nutrition. 1997;127(5):819S-823S. doi:10.1093/jn/127.5.819s
  58. Yan T, Mayne CS, Porter MG. Effects of dietary and animal factors on methane production in dairy cows offered grass silage-based diets. International Congress Series. 2006;1293:123-126. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.024
  59. Piluzza G, Sulas L, Bullitta S. Tannins in forage plants and their role in animal husbandry and environmental sustainability: a review. Grass and Forage Science. 2013;69(1):32-48. doi:10.1111/gfs.12053
  60. Adesogan AT, Ma ZX, Romero JJ, Arriola KG. RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes1. Journal of Animal Science. 2014;92(4):1317-1330. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-7273
  61. El‐Zaiat HM, Al‐Marzooqi W, Al‐Kharousi K. Effects of Chitosan‐Based Additive on Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Community, Nutrients Digestibility and Lactation Performance in Goats. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2024;109(2):338-349. doi:10.1111/jpn.14057
  62. Ferraretto LF, Shaver RD, Bertics SJ. Effect of dietary supplementation with live-cell yeast at two dosages on lactation performance, ruminal fermentation, and total-tract nutrient digestibility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2012;95(7):4017-4028. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-5190
  63. Bernabucci U, Bani P, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Nardone A. Influence of Short- and Long-Term Exposure to a Hot Environment on Rumen Passage Rate and Diet Digestibility by Friesian Heifers. Journal of Dairy Science. 1999;82(5):967-973. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75316-6
Support