STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Research and Reviews : A Journal of Medical Science and Technology Original Research

Role of Therapeutic Index for Local Infections Score in Wound Assessment

  1. Vaibhav Shukla Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
  2. Prof Dr Ravi Kumar Chittoria Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
  3. Jacob Antony Chakiath Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research

Abstract

Local wound infections pose a significant challenge, often detected later, leading to complications like systemic infections. Global nomenclature lacks uniformity, resulting in varied treatments for similar diagnoses. Early intervention is crucial, advocating for local antimicrobial therapy with diverse active agents to avoid systemic antibiotics and mitigate bacterial resistance. The Therapeutic Index for Local Infections (TILI) score, innovated by the German society Initiative Chronis Che Wenden (ICW), emerges as a pivotal solution in confronting diagnostic hurdles associated with local infections. Consisting of six non-specific clinical criteria, the TILI score not only streamlines the diagnostic process but also facilitates standardized treatment protocols, thereby fostering judicious antibiotic utilization across wound care facilities globally. By providing a structured framework for assessment, the TILI score empowers healthcare professionals to make informed decisions, ensuring optimal management of local infections while mitigating the risks associated with antibiotic overuse, thus safeguarding patient well-being and contributing to the global antimicrobial stewardship efforts. This study emphasizes the significance of the TILI (Tissue, Inflammation, Locality, Infection) score in the precise identification of local wound infections. It serves as a crucial tool in determining the necessity of employing local antimicrobial therapy and aids in monitoring the response to treatment for the purpose of evidence-based documentation. By effectively utilizing the TILI score, healthcare professionals can enhance diagnostic accuracy, optimize treatment strategies, and ultimately improve patient outcomes in the management of wound infections

Keywords

References (22)

  1. International Wound Infection Institute. Wound infection in clinical practice. Principles of best practice. Wounds International, 2016.
  2. Lorentzen HF, Gottrup F. Clinical assessment of infection in nonhealing ulcers analyzed by latent class analysis. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2006;14(3):350-353. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00131.x
  3. Murphy C, Atkin L, Swanson T, Tachi M, Tan YK, de Ceniga MV, et al. Defying hard-to-heal wounds with an early antibiofilm intervention strategy: wound hygiene. Journal of Wound Care. 2020;29(Sup3b):S1-S26. doi:10.12968/jowc.2020.29.sup3b.s1
  4. Schwarzkopf A, Dissemond J. Indications and practical implementation of microbiologic diagnostics in patients with chronic wounds. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2015;13(3):203-209. doi:10.1111/ddg.12611
  5. Dissemond J, Steinmann J, Münter KC et al. Risk and clinical impact of bacterial resistance/susceptibility to silver-based wound dressings: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2020; 29(4):221–234. https://doi. org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.12.727.
  6. Amadou C, Denis P, Cosker K, Fagot-Campagna A. Less amputations for diabetic foot ulcer from 2008 to 2014, hospital management improved but substantial progress is still possible: A French nationwide study. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0242524. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242524
  7. O'Meara S, Al-Kurdi D, Ologun Y, Ovington LG, Martyn-St James M, Richardson R. Antibiotics and antiseptics for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;2014(1). doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003557.pub5
  8. Dissemond J, Gerber V, Lobmann R, Kramer A. TILI [(Therapeutic Index for Local Infections)-a new score for the diagnosis of local wound infections]. [In German.] Wundmanagement 2019; 13: 283–287.
  9. Bui UT, Finlayson K, Edwards H. The diagnosis of infection in chronic leg ulcers: A narrative review on clinical practice. International Wound Journal. 2019;16(3):601-620. doi:10.1111/iwj.13069
  10. Jockenhöfer F, Chapot V, Stoffels‐ Weindorf M, Körber A, Klode J, Buer J, et al. Bacterial spectrum colonizing chronic leg ulcers: A 10‐year comparison from a German wound care center. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2014;12(12):1121-1127. doi:10.1111/ddg.12540
  11. Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Chandra Sekhar G, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008;56(1):45. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.37595
  12. Seguí MDM, Cabrero-García J, Crespo A, Verdú J, Ronda E. A reliable and valid questionnaire was developed to measure computer vision syndrome at the workplace. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2015;68(6):662-673. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.015
  13. Argimon-Pallas JM, Jimenez-Villa J. Methods for clinical and epidemiological research. 3rd ed. Elsevier España, 2004.
  14. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Toon CD et al. Antibiotic therapy for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in non surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11:CD010427. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010427.pub2.
  15. Dissemond J, Böttrich JG, Braunwarth H, Hilt J, Wilken P, Münter KC. Evidence for silver in wound care – meta‐analysis of clinical studies from 2000–2015. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2017;15(5):524-535. doi:10.1111/ddg.13233
  16. Hübner NO, Kramer A. Review on the Efficacy, Safety and Clinical Applications of Polihexanide, a Modern Wound Antiseptic. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2010;23(Suppl.1):17-27. doi:10.1159/000318264
  17. Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S, Willy C, Mayer D, Papke R, et al. Consensus on Wound Antisepsis: Update 2018. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2017;31(1):28-58. doi:10.1159/000481545
  18. Huebner C, Flessa S, Huebner NO. The economic impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospitals: a systematic literature review. J Hosp Infect 2019; 102(4):369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhin.2019.03.002.
  19. Dissemond J, Augustin M, Eming SA et al. Modern wound care-practical aspects of non-interventional topical treatment of patients with chronic wounds. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12(7):541–554. https://doi. org/10.1111/ddg.1235.1
  20. Delmore B, Cohen JM, O’Neill D, Chu A, Pham V, Chiu E. Reducing Postsurgical Wound Complications: A Critical Review. Advances in Skin & Wound Care. 2017;30(6):272-286. doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000516426.62418.48
  21. Dissemond J, Augustin M, Eming SA, Goerge T, Horn T, Karrer S, et al. Modern wound care – practical aspects of non‐interventional topical treatment of patients with chronic wounds. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2014;12(7):541-554. doi:10.1111/ddg.12351
  22. Huebner C, Flessa S, Huebner NO. The economic impact of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospitals: a systematic literature review. J Hosp Infect 2019; 102(4):369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhin.2019.03.002.
Support