Research and Reviews : Journal of Computational Biology Original Research

In Silico Molecular Docking Studies of Phytocompounds from Melissa officinalis Against MPXV Poxin Target

  1. Charith R. Department of Bioinformatics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, Bengaluru

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the inhibitory potential of phytocompounds of Melissa officinalis against the MPXV poxin protein target, a key virulence factor in monkeypox infection.

Methods: Molecular docking performed using PyRx, a virtual screening software, was conducted to predict the binding affinities of the compounds to MPXV poxin. Prior to docking, the compounds were subjected to comprehensive analysis, including Lipinski's rule of five, evaluation of physicochemical properties, pharmacological analysis using SwissADME, and toxicity analysis using pkCSM.

Results: The results highlighted caryophyllenol II as the most promising inhibitor, with a binding affinity of -6.7 kcal/mol, suggesting a strong interaction with the target protein. Geranic acid also exhibited notable binding affinity, but to a lesser extent.

Conclusion: Caryophyllenol II emerged as a lead compound for further development as an antiviral agent against monkeypox due to its better binding affinity to MPXV poxin. These findings show the potential of natural phytocompounds as therapeutic agents against viral infections and contribute to the ongoing efforts in antiviral drug discovery.

Keywords

References (34)

  1. Sallam M, Eid H, Awamleh N, Al-Tammemi AA, Barakat M, Athamneh RY, et al. Conspiratorial attitude of the general public in Jordan towards emerging virus infections: a cross-sectional study amid the 2022 Monkeypox outbreak. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(12):411. doi:10.3390/
  2. Magnus PV, Andersen EK, Petersen KB, Birch-Andersen A. A pox-like disease in cynomolgus monkeys. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959;46:156–1
  3. Nguyen PY, Ajisegiri WS, Costantino V, Chughtai AA, MacIntyre CR. Reemergence of Human Monkeypox and Declining Population Immunity in the Context of Urbanization, Nigeria, 2017–2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2021;27(4). doi:10.3201/eid2704.203569
  4. Karagoz A, Tombuloglu H, Alsaeed M, Tombuloglu G, AlRubaish AA, Mahmoud A, et al. Monkeypox (mpox) virus: Classification, origin, transmission, genome organization, antiviral drugs, and molecular diagnosis. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2023;16(4):531-541. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2023.02.003
  5. int. (2022). WHO recommends new name for monkeypox disease [Online]. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2022-who-recommends-new-name-for-monkeypox-disease.
  6. Moss B. Poxvirus Cell Entry: How Many Proteins Does it Take? Viruses. 2012;4(5):688-707. doi:10.3390/v4050688
  7. McInnes CJ, Damon IK, Smith GL, McFadden G, Isaacs SN, Roper RL, et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Poxviridae 2023. Journal of General Virology. 2023;104(5). doi:10.1099/jgv.0.001849
  8. Stanford MM, McFadden G, Karupiah G, Chaudhri G: Immunopathogenesis of poxvirus infections: forecasting the impending storm. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85(2):93– doi:10.1038/sj.icb. 7100033.
  9. Okyay RA, Bayrak E, Kaya E, Şahin AR, Koçyiğit BF, Taşdoğan AM, et al. Another Epidemic in the Shadow of Covid 19 Pandemic: A Review of Monkeypox. Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology. 2022;6(2):95. doi:10.14744/ejmo.2022.2022
  10. Petersen E, Kantele A, Koopmans M, Asogun D, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Ihekweazu C, et al. Human Monkeypox. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 2019;33(4):1027-1043. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2019.03.001
  11. Kang Y, Yu Y, Xu S. Human monkeypox infection threat: A comprehensive overview. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2023;17(4):e0011246. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011246
  12. Huang Y, Mu L, Wang W. Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022;7(1). doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01215-4
  13. Rizk JG, Lippi G, Henry BM, Forthal DN, Rizk Y. Prevention and treatment of monkeypox. Drugs. 2022 Jun;82(9):957-63.
  14. Turner M, Mandia J, Keltner C, Haynes R, Faestel P, Mease L. Monkeypox in Patient Immunized with ACAM2000 Smallpox Vaccine During 2022 Outbreak. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2022;28(11):2336-2338. doi:10.3201/eid2811.221215
  15. Astani A, Heidary Navid M, Schnitzler P. Attachment and Penetration of Acyclovir‐resistant Herpes Simplex Virus are Inhibited by Melissa officinalis Extract. Phytotherapy Research. 2014;28(10):1547-1552. doi:10.1002/ptr.5166
  16. Lee JY, Abundo MEC, Lee CW. Herbal Medicines with Antiviral Activity Against the Influenza Virus, a Systematic Review. The American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 2018;46(08):1663-1700. doi:10.1142/s0192415x18500854
  17. Miraj S, Rafieian-Kopaei, Kiani Melissa officinalis L: A Review study with an antioxidant prospective. J Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2017;22(3):385–394. doi:10.1177/21 565872166634.
  18. Vanti G, Ntallis SG, Panagiotidis CA, Dourdouni V, Patsoura C, Bergonzi MC, et al. Glycerosome of Melissa officinalis L. Essential Oil for Effective Anti-HSV Type 1. Molecules. 2020;25(14):3111. doi:10.3390/molecules25143111
  19. Williams A, Scally G, Langland J. A topical botanical therapy for the treatment of canine papilloma virus associated oral warts: a case series. Adv Integr Med. 2021;8(2):151–15 doi:10.1016/j. aimed.2020.12.003.
  20. Astani A, Reichling J, Schnitzler P. Melissa officinalis Extract Inhibits Attachment of Herpes Simplex Virus in vitro. Chemotherapy. 2012;58(1):70-77. doi:10.1159/000335590
  21. Behzadi A, Imani S, Deravi N, Mohammad Taheri Z, Mohammadian F, Moraveji Z, Shavysi S, Mostafaloo M, Soleimani Hadidi F, Nanbakhsh S, Olangian-Tehrani S, Marabi MH, Behshood P, Poudineh M, Kheirandish A, Keylani K, Behfarnia P. Antiviral potential of Melissa officinalis L.: A literature r Nutr Metab Insights. 2023;16:11786388221146683. doi:10.1177/117863 88221146683.
  22. Petrisor G, Motelica L, Craciun LN, Oprea OC, Ficai D, Ficai A. Melissa officinalis: Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Derived Release Systems—A Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(7):3591. doi:10.3390/ijms23073591
  23. Ahire SM, Jadhav SP, Shewale VV, Pawar PS, Kokande AM, Sonawane DP, Patil DM. A review on computer-aided drug design and d J ReAttach Ther Dev Divers. 2023;6(10s(2)):1573–1582. doi:10.53555/jrtdd.v6i10s(2).2169.
  24. Duchoslav V, Boura E. Structure of monkeypox virus poxin: implications for drug design. Archives of Virology. 2023;168(7). doi:10.1007/s00705-023-05824-4
  25. Sastry GM, Adzhigirey M, Day T, Annabhimoju R, Sherman W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013;27(3):221–234. doi:1007/s10822-013-9644-8.
  26. Fioramonte M, dos Santos AM, McIIwain S, Noble WS, Franchini KG, Gozzo FC. Analysis of secondary structure in proteins by chemical cross‐linking coupled to MS. PROTEOMICS. 2012;12(17):2746-2752. doi:10.1002/pmic.201200040
  27. Hollingsworth SA, Karplus PA. A fresh look at the Ramachandran plot and the occurrence of standard structures in proteins. Biomol Concepts. 2010;1(3-4):271– doi:10.1515/BMC.2010. 022.
  28. Chen X, Li H, Tian L, Li Q, Luo J, Zhang Y. Analysis of the physicochemical properties of acaricides based on Lipinski's rule of five. J Comput Biol. 2020;27(9):1397–1 doi:10.1089/cmb.2019.03.
  29. Molecular Docking for Computer-Aided Drug Design. 2021. doi:10.1016/c2019-0-04960-6
  30. Sapjaroen P, Tangyuenyongwatana P. Study of steric factor on blind docking of phenylbutanoid dimers with PyRx 0.8 virtual screening tool. 35th International Annual Meeting in Pharmaceutical Sciences & CU-MPU International Collaborative Research Conference. Pathumthani, Thailand. 2019. 155–158. College of Oriental Medicine, Rangsit University.
  31. Maurya VK, Kumar S, Singh M, Saxena V. Molecular docking and dynamic studies of novel phytoconstituents in an investigation of the potential inhibition of protein kinase C-beta II in diabetic neuropathy. J Mol Chem. 2023;3(2):589.
  32. Lee J, Beers JL, Geffert RM, Jackson KD. A review of CYP-mediated drug interactions: mechanisms and In vitro drug-drug interaction a Biomol. 2024;14(1):99. doi:10.3390/ biom14010099.
  33. Bhatt S, Dhiman S, Kumar V, Gour A, Manhas D, Sharma K, et al. Assessment of the CYP1A2 Inhibition-Mediated Drug Interaction Potential for Pinocembrin Using In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Approaches. ACS Omega. 2022;7(23):20321-20331. doi:10.1021/acsomega.2c02315
  34. Kanacher T, Lindauer A, Mezzalana E, Michon I, Veau C, Mantilla JDG, et al. A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model Network for the Prediction of CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 Drug–Drug–Gene Interactions with Fluvoxamine, Omeprazole, S-mephenytoin, Moclobemide, Tizanidine, Mexiletine, Ethinylestradiol, and Caffeine. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(12):1191. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12121191
Support