Journal of Water Resource Engineering and Management Original Research

Soil Salinity Assessment and Irrigation Water Quality of Humbo Woreda, Wolaita Zone, South Ethiopia

  1. Zerihun Achiso
  2. Temsgen Gebure

Abstract

Soil salinity affects the majority of Ethiopia's irrigated farmland, and chemical properties of irrigation water quality have major role in assessing the irrigation land salinity. The study has the objective of determining the soil salinity and irrigation water quality. The study was conducted in Humbo Woreda, Wolaita Zone in the South Peoples’ Regional State. The study used standard analytical techniques and methods to analyze different physiochemical parameters of both irrigation water and soil of irrigated areas. The mean analysis results of irrigated soil parameters like pH, ECe, TDS, Ca, OC, TN, CEC Na, and SAR are: 7.9 to 9.5 for pH, 5.97 to 8.96 dS/m for ECe, 180 to 794 ppm for TDS, 1.3 to 1.6 g/cm3 for BD, 1.2 to 1.75% for OC, 0.083 to 0.14% for TN, 4.2 to 6.54 meq/100 g for Na and 2.13 to 2.96 for SAR. The mean analysis results of physiochemical parameters of irrigation water used at study site for pH, ECe, TDS, Ca+2, Mg+2, Na+, K+, SAR, HCO3-2, CO3-, SO4-2 and Cl- were: 7.77±0.12, 2.51±0.22dS/m, 1241.5±56.95 mg/l, (5.15±0.52, 3.06±0.56, 2.28±0.36, 0.15±0.02) meq/100 g, 1.13±0.2, 5.4±0.34, (0.56±0.06, 0.05±0.01 and 2.79±0.61) ppm respectively. The analysis results of soil physiochemical parameters indicate that the irrigated soil of study was moderate to strongly saline and water analysis also shows that the irrigated water is also moderately saline. The study concludes that the irrigated land was moderately saline due to irrigation water salinity and it would be better to treat irrigation water before irrigating land. Study recommends that it would be better to treat irrigation water and plant salinity tolerant grass to treat soil salinity.

Keywords

References (198)

  1. Ackah M, Agyemang O, Anim AK, Osei J, Bentil NO, Kpattah L, Gyamfi ET, Hanson JEK.
  2. Assessment of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation: the case study of Teiman-Oyarifa
  3. Community, Ga East Municipality, Ghana. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci. 2011; 1(3–4): 186–194.
  4. Al-Rashdi TT, Sulaiman H. Assessment of physiochemical properties of farm soils and irrigation
  5. water around a major industrial area in Oman. Proc Environ Sci. 2015; 28: 265–270.
  6. R, Lavini A, Annette P. Effect of water and salinity stress on radiation
  7. absorption and efficiency in sunflower. Ital J Agron. 2000; 4: 53–60.6061.
  8. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
  9. Waste Water. 17th Edn. Washington, DC. 200005. 1-30: 40–175. 1989;
  10. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th Edn. 2005.
  11. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Virginia,
  12. USA. 2000; 1: 23–84.
  13. Ashraf M, Harris PJC. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica.
  14. 2013; 51(2): 163–190.
  15. Ayers RS, Westcot DW. Water quality for agriculture. In FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29
  16. (Rev. 1). Rome, Italy: Food and Agricultural Organization; 1985.
  17. Bresler E, McNeal BL, Carter DL. Saline water, soils. Principles-dynamics –modeling. Adv Series
  18. Agric Sci. No. 10. NY: Springer-Verlag; 1982.
  19. Bouyoucos GH. Recalibration of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis of soil. Agron J.
  20. 1951; 43: 434–438.
  21. Chopra SL, Kanwar JS. Analytical Agricultural Chemistry. Ludhiana and New Delhi: Kalyan
  22. Publishers; 1980; 168–307.
  23. Delfine S, Alvino A, Villani MC, Loreto F. Restrictions to carbon dioxide conductance and
  24. photosynthesis in spinach leaves recovering from salt stress. Plant Physiol. 1999; 119(3): 1101–1106.
  25. Akinyele IO, Shokumbi OS. Comparative analysis of dry ashing and wet digestion methods for the
  26. determination of trace and heavy metals in food sample. National Library of Medicine. 2008; 173:
  27. Embaby AAA, El-Barbary SMAJ. Evaluation of Quaternary aquifer for agricultural purposes in
  28. northwest Sinai, Egypt. J Am Sci. 2011; 7(3): 344–361.
  29. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). Water quality for agriculture. Paper no. 29. FAO
  30. irrigation and drainage paper. 1985. https://sleigh-munoz.co.uk/wash/Mara/ FAOwqa/WQA0.pdf.
  31. Flexas J, Diaz-Espejo A, Galmés J, Kaldenhoff R, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M. Rapid variations of
  32. mesophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2concentration around leaves. Plant Cell
  33. Environ. 2007; 30(10): 1284–1298.
  34. Genuchten MT, Hoffman GJ. Analysis of crop salt tolerance data. In: Shainberg I, Shalhevet J,
  35. editors. Soil Salinity under Irrigation, Processes and Management, Ecological Studies. Vol. 3. New
  36. York, NY, USA: Springer; 1984; 258–271.
  37. Ghanem ME, Martínez-Andújar C, Albacete A, P s íš vá H, Dodd IC, Pérez-Alfocea F, Lutts S.
  38. Nitrogen form alters hormonal balance in salt-treated tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.). J Plant
  39. Growth Regul. 2011; 30(2): 144–157.
  40. Ghosh AB, Bajaj JC, Hasan R, Singh D. Soil and Water Testing Methods. A Laboratory Manual.
  41. Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry. New Delhi 110012: IARI; 1983; 1–48. Golterman
  42. HL. Methods for chemical Analysis for Fresh Waters. Oxford: Black well Scientific Pub.; 1971.
  43. Giuffrida F, Scuderi D, Giurato R, Leonardi C. Physiological response of broccoli and Cauliflower
  44. as Affected by NaCl Salinity. Acta Hortic. 2013 Sep; 1005(1005): 435–441. Giuffrida F, Carla C,
  45. Angelo M, Cherubino L. Effects of salt stress imposed during two growth phases on cauliflower
  46. production and quality. J Sci Food Agric. 2017; 97(5): 1552–1560.
  47. Grattan S. Irrigation Water Salinity and Crop Production. UCANR Publications, University of
  48. California; 2002. Gunes A, Inal A, Bagci EG, Coban S, Sahin O. Silicon increases boron tolerance and
  49. reduces oxidative damage of wheat grown in soil with excess boron. Biol Plant. 2007; 51: 571–574.
  50. Grattan SR, Grieve CM. Mineral element acquisition and growth response of plants grown in saline
  51. environments. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1992; 38(4): 275–300.
  52. Hanson B, Grattan A, Fulton A. Agricultural Salinity and Drainage; Davis, California Irrigation
  53. Program WMS (Water Management Series) 3375. Oakland, CA, USA: University of California;
  54. 2006; 1–159.1–574.
  55. Hopkins BG, Horneck DA, Stevens RG, Ellsworth JW, Sallivan DM. Managing Irrigation Water
  56. Quality for crop production in the Pacific Northwest. A Pacific Northwest Extension publication.
  57. Oregon State University; 2007.
  58. Golterman HL. Methods for chemical Analysis for Fresh Waters. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Pub;
  59. Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Becomes a Global Priority. Available online:
  60. http://www.erails.netconsulted (accessed on 2 February 2017).
  61. Hunt DTE, Wilson AL. The Chemical Analysis of Water - General Principles and Techniques. 2nd
  62. Edn. Cambridge: R Soc Chem; 1986; 29–43.
  63. Islam MR, Jahiruddin M, Islam S. Assessment of Arsenic in the water-soil-plant systems in
  64. Gangetic Floodplains of Bangladesh. Asian J Plant Sci. 2004; 3(4): 489–493.
  65. Islam MR, Jahiruddin M, Islam S. Assessment of Arsenic in the water-soil-plant systems in
  66. Gangetic Floodplains of Bangladesh. Asian J Plant Sci. 2004; 3(4): 489–493.
  67. Khajanchi L, Meena RL. Diagnosis of soil and water for salinity. In: Conjunctive Use of Canal and
  68. Groundwater. Karnal, India: Intech Graphics; 2008; 57–66.
  69. Kirda C. Assessment of irrigation water quality. CCIHEAM-Options
  70. ’s Ser. A No.
  71. 1997; 367–377.
  72. Lal MK, Kumar A, Kumar A, Rigond P, Oko AO, Thakur N, Parmar V, Thakur A, Singh B. Dietary
  73. fibers in potato. In: Rigond P, Singh B, Dutt S, Chakrabarti SK, editors. Potato. Singapore: Springer;
  74. 2020; 37–50.
  75. Latef AAHA, Chaoxing H. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, mineral nutrition,
  76. anti-oxidant enzymes activity and fruit yield of tomato grown under salinity stress. Sci Hortic. 2011;
  77. 127(3): 228–233.
  78. Latha MR, Indirani R, Sheeba S, Francis HJ. Ground water quality of Coimbatore district Tamil
  79. Nadu. J Ecobiol. 2002; 14(3): 217–221.
  80. Läuchli A, Grattan SR. Plant growth and development under salinity stress. In Advances in
  81. Molecular Breeding toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
  82. Springer; 2007; 1–32.
  83. López-Berenguer C, Martínez-Ballesta MDC, Moreno DA, Carvajal M, García-Viguera C.
  84. Growing hardier crops for better health: Salinity tolerance and the nutritional value of broccoli. J
  85. Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57(2): 572–578.
  86. Lutaladio N., CastaldiL. Potato: The Hidden Treasure. J Food Compos Anal. 2009; 22(6): 491–493.
  87. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2009.05.02.
  88. Maas EV, Grattan SR. Crop yields as affected by salinity. Agronomy. 1999; 38: 55–110.
  89. Maas EV, Hoffman GJ. Crop salt tolerance Current assessment. ASCE J Irrig Drain Div. 1977;
  90. 103(2): 115–134.
  91. Maas EV. Crop salt tolerance. In: Tanji KK, editor. Agricultural salinity assessment and
  92. management; ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice. Reston, VA, USA: American
  93. Society of Civil Engineers; 1990; 262–304.
  94. Machado RMA. EstudosSobreaInfluência da Rega-Gota-a-GotaSubsuperficialna Dinamicade
  95. Enraizamento, no RendimentoFísicoenaQualidade da Matéria-Prima doTomate de Indústria. Ph.D.
  96. Thesis. Évora Portugal: Universidad de Évora; 2002. Machado RM, Bryla DR, Vargas O. Effects
  97. of salinity induced by ammonium sulfate fertilizer on root and shoot growth of high bush blueberry.
  98. Acta Hortic, 2014; 1017: 407–414.
  99. Machado RMA, Bryla DR, Verissimo ML, Sena AM, Oliveira MRG. Nitrogen requirements for
  100. growth and early fruit development of drip-irrigated processing tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum
  101. Mill.) in Portugal. J Food Agric Environ. 2008; 6(3–4): 215–218.
  102. Maggio A, De Pascale S, Fagnano M, Barbieri G. Saline agriculture in Mediterranean
  103. environments. Ital J Agron. 2011; 6(1): 36–43.
  104. Maggio A, Dalton FN, Piccinni G. The effects of elevated carbon dioxide on static and dynamic
  105. indices for tomato salt tolerance. Eur J Agron. 2002; 16(3): 197–206.
  106. Mahmood S, Daur I, Al-Solaimani SG, Ahmad S, Madkour MH, Yasir M, Ali Z. Plant Growth
  107. Promoting Rhizobacteria and Silicon Synergistically Enhance Salinity Tolerance of Mung Bean.
  108. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 876.
  109. Malash N, Flowers TJ, Ragab R. The Effect of irrigation systems and water management practices
  110. using saline and non-saline water on tomato production. Agric Water Manage. 2005; 78(1–2): 25–38.
  111. Marcelis LFM, Van Hooijdonk J. Effect of salinity on growth, water use and nutrient use in radish
  112. (Raphanussativus L). Plant Soil. 1999; 215: 57–64.
  113. Martinez V, Cerda A. Influence of N source on rate of Cl, N, Na and K uptake by cucumber seedling
  114. grown in saline condition. J Plant Nutr. 1989; 12(8): 971–983.
  115. Massoud FI. Basic principles for prognosis and monitoring of salinity and sodicity. In: Proc.
  116. International Conference on managing saline water for irrigation. Lubbock Texas: Texas
  117. Technological University; 1976 Aug 16–22; 432–454.
  118. Munns R, Husain S, Rivelli AR, Richard AJ, Condon AG, Megan PL, Evans SL, Schachtman DP,
  119. Hare RA. Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops, and the role of physiologically based
  120. selection traits. Plant Soil. 2002; 247: 93–105.
  121. Munns R, Schachtman DP, Condon AG. The significance of a two-phase growth response to
  122. salinity in wheat and barley. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1995; 22(4): 561–569.
  123. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008; 59: 651–681.
  124. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. Estimation of available P in a soil by extraction with
  125. sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 939. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Agriculture; 1954.
  126. Ouni Y, Ghnaya T, Montemurro F, Abdelly C, Lakhdar A. The role of humid substances in
  127. mitigating the harmful effects of soil salinity and improve plant productivity. Int J Plant Prod. 2014;
  128. 8(3): 353–374.
  129. Paranychianakis NV, Chartzoulakis KS. Irrigation of Mediterranean crops with saline water: From
  130. physiology to management practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2005; 106(2–3): 171–187.
  131. Pimentel D, Berger B, Filiberto D, Newton M, Wolfe B, Karabinakis E, Clark S, Poon E, Abbett E,
  132. Nandaopal S. Water Resources: Agricultural and Environmental Issues. Bio Science. 2004; 54(10):
  133. Raigond P, Atkinson FS, Lal MK, Thakur N, Singh B, Mishra T. Potato carbohydrates. In: Raigond
  134. P, Singh B, Dutt S, Chakrabarti SK, editors. Potato. Singapore: Springer; 2020; 13–36.
  135. Sadashaiah C, Ramakrishnaiah CR, Ranganna G. Hydro chemical analysis and Evaluation of
  136. ground water Quality in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. Int J Environ Res Public health.
  137. 2008; 5(3): 158–164.
  138. Sandoval-Villa M, Wood CW. Guertal EA. Effects of nitrogen form, nighttime nutrient solution
  139. strength, and cultivar on greenhouse tomato production. J Plant Nutr. 1999; 22(12): 1931–1945.
  140. Shahbaz M, Ashraf M, Al-Qurainy F, Harris PJC. Salt tolerance in selected vegetable crops. Crit
  141. Rev Plant Sci. 2012; 31(4): 303–320.
  142. Shannon MC, Grieve CM. Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Sci Hortic. 1998; 78(1–4): 5–38.
  143. Shimomachi T, Kawahara Y, Kobashigawa C, Omoda E, Hamabe K, Tamaya K. Effect of residual
  144. salinity on spinach growth and nutrient contents in polder soil. Acta Hortic. 2008; 797: 419–424.
  145. Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting
  146. bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015; 22(2): 123–131.
  147. Silvertooth JC. Fertigation in Arid Regions and Saline Soils. Fertigation Selected Papers of the IPI
  148. NATESC-CAU-CAAS, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fertigation, Beijing,
  149. China. 2005 Sep 20–24.
  150. Singh AK, Mahato MK, Neogi B, Singh KK. Quality assessment of mine water in the Raniganj
  151. coalfield area, India. Mine Water Environ. 2010; 29(4): 248–262.
  152. Snapp SS, Shennan C, Bruggen AV. Effects of salinity on severity of infection by Phytophthora
  153. parasitica Dast ion concentrations and growth of tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. New
  154. Phytol. 1991; 119(2): 275–284.
  155. Sonneveld C, Voogt W. Plant Nutrition of Greenhouse Crops. New York, NY, USA: Springer;
  156. Stolte J, Tesfai M, Øygarden L, Kværnø S, Keizer J, Verheijen F, Panagos P, Ballabio C, Hessel R.
  157. Soil threats in Europe: Status, Methods, Drivers and Effects on Ecosystem Services: Deliverable
  158. 1 of the RECARE Project. Vol. EUR 27607. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the
  159. European Community; 2015; 69–78.
  160. Sumner ME, Naidu R. Sodic Soils Distribution, Properties, Management, and Environmental
  161. Consequences. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  162. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. 3rd Edn. Sunderland, UK: Sinauer; 2002; 690.
  163. USSL (United States Salinity Laboratory). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils.
  164. Agricultural Handbook No. 60. USDA; 1954.
  165. Wolf B. A comprehensive system of leaf analysis and its use for diagnostic crop nutrient statuses.
  166. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1982; 13(12): 1044–1045.
  167. Xu G, Magen H, Tarchitzky J, Kafkafi U. Advances in chloride nutrition of plants. Adv Agronom.
  168. 1999; 68: 97–150.
  169. Yeo AR. Salinity. In: Yeo AR, Flowers TJ, editors. Plant Solute Transport. Oxford, UK: Blackwell;
  170. 2007; 340–365.
  171. Zribi L, Gharbi F, Rezgui F, Rejeb S, Nahdi H, Rejeb MN. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence
  172. for the diagnosis of salt stress in tomato. Solanumlycopersicum (variety Rio Grande). Sci Hortic.
  173. 2009; 120(3): 367–372.
  174. Smith CJ, Oster JD, Sposito G. Potassium and magnesium in irrigation water quality assessment.
  175. Agric Water Manag. 2015; 157: 59–64.
  176. Dejene A, Kibebew K, Sheleme B, Fassil K. Spatial and temporal dynamics of irrigation water
  177. quality in Zeway, Ketar, and Bulbula sub-watersheds, central rift valley of Ethiopia. Ethiop J Agric
  178. Sci. 2018; 28(3): 55–77. https://data.moa.gov.et/dataset/doi-10-20372-eiar-rdm-aeueti.
  179. Wackily A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determination of soil organic matter
  180. and a proposal modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934; 37(1): 29–38.
  181. Van Reeuwijk LP. 1992. Procedure for soil analyses. 3rd Edn. Int Soil Reference and Information
  182. The Netherlands. P.O. Box 353, 6700 AJ Wageningen.
  183. USDA Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting
  184. soil samples. Soil survey Investigations Report No. 1. 1982.
  185. Hazelton P, Murphy B. Interpreting Soil Test Results: what Do All the Numbers Mean? Australia:
  186. CSIRO Publishing; 2007. https://www.agrifs.ir/sites/default/files/ Interpreting %20Soil
  187. %20Test%20Results%2C%20What%20Do%20All%20The%20Numbers%20Mean%20%7BPam
  188. %20Hazelton%7D%20%5B9780643092259%5D%20%28CSIRO%20Publishing%20
  189. %202007%29_1.pdf.
  190. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Soil Quality Indicators, Natural Resources
  191. Conservation
  192. https://nrcspad.sc.egov.usda.gov/DistributionCenter/pdf.aspx?productID=397
  193. Ethio SIS (Ethiopia Soil Information System). Soil Fertility Status and Fertilizer Recommendation
  194. Atlas for Tigray Regional State, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethio SIS; 2014.
  195. https://www.ata.gov.et/download/soil-fertility-status-fertilizer-recommendation-atlas-tigray
  196. regional-state_jul2014/.
  197. Yara. (2021 May 26). Growing Maize in an Acidic Soil Environment. [Online]. Knowledge Grows.
  198. https://www.yara.co.ke/crop-nutrition/agronomy-advice/growing-maize-in-anacidic-soil-environment/
Support