STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Water Resource Engineering and Management Original Research

Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Jaipur District, Rajasthan, India, Using Water Quality Index

  1. Jay Prakash Department of Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  2. Bhavya Katiwal Department of Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  3. Naina Raj Department of Civil Engineering, Rajasthan Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

There are both open and closed bore wells. This research focuses on evaluating the groundwater quality in Jaipur by utilizing the Water Quality Index. For this comprehensive study, 22 water samples were meticulously collected from open and closed bore wells distributed across 22 different blocks within the district. The analysis involved measuring key physicochemical parameters, including pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, total dissolved solids, and salinity. These parameters were chosen due to their significant impact on water quality and their relevance to public health. The average water quality characteristics over the entire study period were used to calculate the Water Quality Index. The results of the study reveal that none of the sampled locations exhibit groundwater quality that is considered excellent for consumption purposes. This study’s findings are crucial as they highlight the pressing need for improved water quality management in the Jaipur district. The data and insights derived from this research will assist planners and policymakers in identifying specific areas where intervention is needed. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of implementing strategic measures to enhance water quality and ensure the sustainable extraction of groundwater resources in Jaipur. Such actions are essential for safeguarding public health and ensuring the long-term availability of clean drinking water in the region.

Keywords

References (80)

  1. Chopra RPS, Krishan G. Analysis of aquifer characteristics and quality in southwest Punjab, India.
  2. J Earth Sci Eng. 2014; 4: 597–604.
  3. Chopra RPS, Krishan G. Assessment of groundwater quality in Punjab. J Earth Sci Clim Change.
  4. 2014; 5: 243. doi:10.4172/2157-7617.1000243.
  5. Krishan G, Rao MS, Loyal RS, Lohani AK, Tuli NK, et al. Groundwater level analyses of Punjab,
  6. India: A quantitative approach. Octa J Environ Res. 2014; 2 (3): 221–226.
  7. Krishan G, Lapworth DJ, Rao MS, Kumar CP, Smilovic M, et al. Natural (baseline) groundwater
  8. quality in the Bist-Doab catchment, Punjab, India: A pilot study comparing shallow and deep
  9. aquifers. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 2014; 7 (1): 16–26.
  10. Krishan G, Rao MS, Purushothaman P, Rawat YS, Kumar CP, et al. Groundwater resources in BistDoab region, Punjab, India: An overview. NDC-WWC J. 2014; 3 (2): 5–13.
  11. Krishan G, Lohani AK, Rao MS, Kumar CP. Prioritization of groundwater monitoring sites using
  12. cross-correlation analysis. NDC-WWC J. 2014; 3 (2): 28–31.
  13. Krishan G, Singh RP, Takshi KS. Water level fluctuation as the sum of environmental and
  14. anthropogenic activities in Southeast, Punjab (India). J Environ Anal Toxicol. 2015; 5: 298.
  15. Krishan G, Singh RP, Khanna A, Singh S, Ghosh NC. Recent groundwater status of groundwater
  16. in Haridwar district, Uttarakhand. In: Proceedings of National Seminar on R & D Perspective for
  17. Rejuvenation of River Ganga; 2015 Dec 16-17; Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India. NIH; 2015. 12–13 p.
  18. Krishan G, Singh S, Sharma A, Sandhu C, Grischek T, et al. Assessment of river quality for river
  19. bank filtration along Yamuna River in Agra-Mathura districts of Uttar Pradesh. In: Proceedings of
  20. National Conference on Monitoring and Management of Drinking Water Quality (MMDWQ) &
  21. XXVIII annual conference of National Environment Science Academy; 2015 Dec 21-23;
  22. Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. UCOST; 2015.
  23. Lapworth DJ, Krishan G, Macdonald AM, Rao MS, Gooddy DC, et al. Using environmental tracers
  24. to understand the response of groundwater resources in new India to sustained abstraction. In:
  25. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference of International Association of Hydro-geologists
  26. (IAH-2014) on Groundwater: Challenges and Strategies; 2014 Sep 18–19; Marrakech, Morocco:
  27. Lapworth DJ, Krishan G, Rao MS, MacDonald AM. (2014). Intensive groundwater exploitation in
  28. the Punjab: an evaluation of resource and quality trends. NERC Open Res Arch BGS-UK, OR-14-
  29. [Online] Available at https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509752/
  30. Lapworth DJ, MacDonald AM, Krishan G, Rao MS, Gooddy DC, et al. Groundwater recharge and
  31. age-depth profiles of intensively exploited groundwater resources in northwest India. Geophys Res
  32. Lett. 2015; 42 (10): 10664–10671. doi:10.1002/2015GL066416.
  33. Rodell M, Velicogna I, Famiglietti JS. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India.
  34. Nature. 2009; 460 (7258): 999–1002. doi:10.1038/nature08238.
  35. Macdonald AM, Bonsor HC, Rao MS, Krishan G, Steenburgen FV, et al. Groundwater topologies
  36. in the Indo-Gangetic Basin. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Water
  37. Resources Development & Management; 2013 Oct 23–27; Chandigarh, India. PU; 2013.
  38. Macdonald AM, Bonsor HC, Krishan G, Rao MS, Ahmed KM, et al. Groundwater in the IndoGangetic Basin: evolution of groundwater typologies. In: Proceedings of the 41st International
  39. Conference of International Association of Hydro-geologists (IAH-2014) on Groundwater:
  40. Challenges and Strategies; 2014 Sep 18–19; Marrakech, Morocco: NERC.
  41. MacDonald AM, Bonsor HC, Taylor R, Shamsudduha M, Burgess WG, et al. Groundwater
  42. resources in the Indo-Gangetic Basin: resilience to climate change and abstraction. British
  43. Geological Survey Open Report, OR/15/047. 2015. p. 63.
  44. Gautam SK, Maharana C, Sharma D, Singh AK, Tripathi JK, et al. Evaluation of groundwater
  45. quality in the Chotanagpur plateau region of the Subarnarekha River basin, Jharkhand State, India.
  46. Sustain Water Qual Ecol. 2015; 6: 57–74. doi:10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.02.002.
  47. Krishan G, Rao MS, Kumar CP. Estimation of radon concentration in groundwater of coastal area
  48. in Baleshwar district of Odisha, India. Indoor Built Environ. 2014; 23 (3): 396–404. Doi:
  49. 1177/1420326X13480254.
  50. Krishan G, Rao MS, Kumar CP. Radon concentration in groundwater of East Coast of West Bengal,
  51. India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2015; 303 (3): 2221–2225. doi:10.1007/s10967-014-3655-0.
  52. Singh S, Singh C, Kumar K, Gupta R, Mukherjee S. Spatial-temporal monitoring of groundwater
  53. using multivariate statistical techniques in Bareilly district of Uttar Pradesh, India. J Hydrol
  54. Hydromech. 2009; 57 (1): 45–54. doi:10.2478/v10098-009-0005-1.
  55. Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Mukherjee S. Modeling mineral phase change chemistry of
  56. groundwater in a rural-urban fringe. Water Sci Technol. 2012; 66 (7): 1502–1510. Doi:
  57. 2166/wst.2012.352.
  58. Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Pandey AC, Gautam SK. Integrated assessment of groundwater
  59. influenced by a confluence river system: Concurrence with remote sensing and geochemical
  60. modelling. Water Resour Manage. 2013; 27: 4291–4313. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0406-7.
  61. Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Singh D, Han D, Gautam SK, et al. Modeling groundwater quality over
  62. a humid subtropical region using numerical indices, earth observation datasets, and X-ray
  63. diffraction technique: A case study of Allahabad district, India. Environ Geochem Health. 2015; 37
  64. : 157–180. doi:10.1007/s10653-014-9647-x.
  65. Kim AG, Cardone CR. Scatterscore: A reconnaissance method to evaluate changes in water quality.
  66. Environ Monit Assess. 2005; 111 (1–3): 277–295. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-8225-0.
  67. Liou SM, Lo SL, Wang SH. A generalized water quality index for Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess.
  68. 2004; 96 (1–3): 35–52. doi:10.1023/B.0000031715.83752.a1.
  69. Sargaonkar A, Deshpande V. Development of an overall index of pollution for surface water based
  70. on a general classification scheme in Indian context. Environ Monit Assess. 2003; 89 (1): 43–67.
  71. doi:10.1023/A:1025886025137.
  72. Tsegaye T, Sheppard D, Islam KR, Johnson A, Tadesse W, et al. Development of chemical index
  73. as a measure of in-stream water quality in response to land use and land cover changes. Water Air
  74. Soil Pollut. 2006; 174 (1–4): 161–179. doi:10.1007/s11270-006-9098-6.
  75. Tiwari AK, Singh AK. Hydrogeochemical investigation and groundwater quality assessment of
  76. Pratapgarh district, Uttar Pradesh. J Geol Soc India. 2014; 83 (3): 329–343. doi:10.1007/s12594-
  77. Krishan G, Khanna A, Singh S, Singh RP, Ghosh NC. Water quality index of groundwater in
  78. Haridwar district, Uttarakhand. Water Energy Int. 2016; 58 (3): 55–58.
  79. World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking water quality. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland:
  80. World Health Organization; 1996.
Support