Journal of Structural Engineering and Management Review Article

Structural Load Evaluation of a Low-Rise Residential Building (G+4) Using STAAD.Pro: A Review

  1. Ashwini P. Meshram Department of Civil Engineering, Kavikulguru Institute of Technology and Science, Ramtek, RTM Nagpur University
  2. Nikhil K. Borkar Department of Civil Engineering, Kavikulguru Institute of Technology and Science, Ramtek, RTM Nagpur University
  3. Omprakash G. Bhalavi Department of Civil Engineering, Kavikulguru Institute of Technology and Science, Ramtek, RTM Nagpur University
  4. Shubham P. Kawale Department of Civil Engineering, Kavikulguru Institute of Technology and Science, Ramtek, RTM Nagpur University

Abstract

The structural analysis and design of multi-story residential buildings have become more complex because cities continue to grow while safety requirements become more demanding and building codes establish stricter requirements. The traditional methods of structural analysis worked through manual execution which required extended periods to complete and suffered from computational errors that primarily affected indeterminate structures and lateral loading conditions. This review paper providesa detailed evaluation of previous works related to the analysis and design of G+4 and similar multi- story residential buildings that have relied on computer-aided structural analysis software, with a special emphasis on STAAD.Pro. The studies subjected to review have centered on determining the behavior of structure under gravity, wind, and earthquake forces according to Indian Standard codes IS 456:2000, IS 875, and IS 1893. The study evaluates programming parameters through their measurement of bending moments, shear forces, axial forces, story displacements, and deflections. Software analysis produces accurate results which ensure code compliance and decrease design time while optimizing material usage according to the literature review. The review demonstrates that STAAD.Pro provides capabilities for reinforcement detailing and serviceability checks. The paper demonstrates that STAAD.Pro provides reliable and efficient design capabilities for creating safe and economical and sustainable low- to mid-rise residential buildings.

Keywords

References (12)

  1. Bhoyar P, Kamdi G, Fasate V. Review paper on analysis and design of residential G+4 building by using STAAD.Pro. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2024;12(3):1120–1126.
  2. Parmar JS, Patel R, Shah A. Seismic analysis of G+5 reinforced concrete building using STAAD.Pro. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2023;10(6):845–852.
  3. Ahmad Y, Khan M, Hussain A. Seismic performance evaluation of braced and unbraced RC buildings using STAAD.Pro. Int J Struct Civ Eng Res. 2023;12(4):287–294.
  4. Mohamed MH, Hassan AA, Noor SM. A review on analysis and design of mid-rise buildings using STAAD.Pro. Int J Civ Eng Technol. 2021;12(9):56–64.
  5. Malarande M, Kulkarni P, Patil S. Comparative study of seismic zone effect on reinforced concrete buildings using STAAD.Pro. Int J Trend Sci Res Dev. 2020;4(2):690–696.
  6. Anup B, Reddy S, Prakash M. Analysis and design of G+4 residential building using STAAD.Pro. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2019;8(5):1021–1026.
  7. Isse AY, Osman HA, Ali MA. Review on structural analysis of multi-storey buildings using STAAD.Pro. J Eng Res Appl. 2021;11(7):18–24.
  8. Kewlan R, Deshmukh A, Pawar S. Design and analysis of G+4 commercial building using STAAD.Pro. Int J Eng Sci Res Technol. 2022;11(2):455–462.
  9. Wadekar AA, Jadhav S, Patil R. Review on analysis and design of multi-storey buildings using STAAD.Pro. Int J Adv Res Civ Eng. 2022;5(1):33–40.
  10. Kulbhushan K, Sharma R, Verma P. Comparative study of ETABS and STAAD.Pro for multistorey building analysis. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2019;8(6):901–907.
  11. Viswanath R, Naik S, Kulkarni S. Seismic retrofit of RC buildings using concentric bracing systems: A review. Int J Struct Eng. 2023;14(3):210–218.
  12. Ansari AZ, Khan MS, Rahman F. Review on seismic analysis of tall buildings using STAAD.Pro. Int J Civ Struct Eng Res. 2024;12(1):65–74.
Support