STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Structural Engineering and Management Original Research

Formulation of Load Chart Table for Precast Prestressed Double Tee Slab

  1. Ganesh More Department of Applied Mechanics, Government College of Engineering, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India
  2. S.A. Bhalchandra Department of Applied Mechanics, Government College of Engineering, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The increasing demand for office buildings, shopping malls, industrial facilities, and residential structures underscores the necessity for rapid construction systems. Among these, precast concrete structures have gained traction in the construction industry, with beam-to-column/wall connections playing a crucial role. Precast prestressed T-slabs, primarily used as floor slab elements, offer advantages such as longer spans (up to 12 m to 15 m) and simplified construction processes due to their one-way slab configuration. The utilization of these T-slabs eliminates the need for formwork, resulting in significant time savings. Recent construction projects have embraced innovative methods to expedite construction timelines and enhance efficiency. The precast concrete approach facilitates efficient construction management by leveraging standardized, high-quality components manufactured in factories and assembled on-site. Double tee slabs, extensively employed in building construction due to their simplicity and cost-effectiveness, undergo design considerations for live load chart table development. This table provides direct live load values for various section configurations, spans, and strand arrangements with differing diameters. The abstract succinctly outlines the paper's content, encompassing the undertaken work, results, and conclusions, aiding potential readers in determining the relevance of the full paper. Adherence to formatting guidelines ensures uniformity and readability, essential for the publication process.

Keywords

References (30)

  1. Johannes Van Greunen and Alexander C. Scordelis, “Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete slabs,”
  2. Vol. 109, No. 7, ASCE, ISSN 0733-9445/83/0007- 1742, Paper No. 18113, pp.1742-1760, 1983.
  3. Bohdan K. Boczkaj, “Design prestressed concrete section for flexure,” Vol. 110, No. 3, ASCE,
  4. ISSN 0733-9445/84/0003-0439, Paper No. 18666439, pp. 439-460, 1984.
  5. A.J. MacRae and M. Z. Cohn, “Optimization of prestressed concrete flat plates” Vol.113,No. 5,
  6. ASCE, ISSN 0733-9445/87/0005-0943, Paper No. 21464, pp. 943-957, 1987.
  7. Nabil F. Grace and John B. Kennedy, “Dynamic characteristics of prestressed waffle slabs,”
  8. Vol.116, No. 6, ASCE, ISSN 0733-9445/90/0006-1547, Paper No. 24762, pp. 1547-1564, 1990.
  9. Adnan Kuyucular, (1991), “Prestressing optimization of concrete slabs,” Vol. 117, No. 1, ASCE,
  10. ISSN0733-9445/91/0001-0235, Paper No. 25452, pp. 235-254, 1991.
  11. Bilal M. Ayyub, Young G. Sohn and Hamid Saadatmanesh, “Prestressed composite girders:
  12. experimental study for negative moment,” Vol. 118, No. 10, ASCE, ISSN 0733-9445/92/0010-
  13. 2743, Paper No. 26885, pp. 2743-2762, 1992.
  14. Lin Yang, “Design of prestressed hollow core slabs with reference to web shear failure,” Vol. 120,
  15. No.9, 9 1SSN 0733-9445/94/0009-2675, Paper No. 62797, pp. 2675-2696, 1994.
  16. Ranier Adonis Barbieri and Francisco de Paula, “Numerical model for the analysis of unbonded
  17. Prestressed Members,” Journal of structural engineering, Vol. 132, No. 1, DOI:
  18. 1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:1(34), pp. 34-42, 2006.
  19. Mostafa Tazarv, Lucas Bohn and Nadim Wehbe, “Rehabilitation of Longitudinal Joints in DoubleTee Girder Bridges,” doi:10.1061/(ASCE) BE.1943-5592.0001412, pp. 1-14, 2019.
  20. Xing-Hua Li, Gang Wu and Sheng Wang, “Flexural Behavior of Hollow-Core Slabs Strengthened with
  21. Prestressed Basalt FRP Grids,” doi:10.1061/(ASCE) CC.1943- 5614.0000939, 2019, pp. 1-12, 2019.
  22. Victor Torres, Navid Zolghadri, Marc Maguire and Paul Barl, “Experimental and Analytical
  23. Investigation of Live-Load Distribution Factors for Double Tee Bridges,” DOI:
  24. 1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001259, pp.1-11, 2018.
  25. H. Mostafaei, F. J. Vecchio, P. Gauvreau and M. Semelawy, “Punching Shear Behavior of Externally
  26. Prestressed Concrete Slabs,” doi:10.1061/ASCEST.1943- 541X.0000283, pp. 100-108, 2011.
  27. Cement and Concrete Sectional Committee, CED 2, IS 1343:2012, Indian Standard for “Prestressed
  28. Concrete – Code of Practice”, second revision, ICS 91.080.40; 91.100.30.
  29. Canadian Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, “CPCI Design Manual,” fifth edition, ISBN 978-
  30. 1-7750090-1-6, pp. 1-87, 2017.
Support