Journal of Petroleum Engineering & Technology Original Research
Experimental Validation of a pH-Dependent Kinetic Model for Bioremediation of Crude Oil-Contaminated Soil Using Pseudomonas sp.
Abstract
A kinetic model that relates the pH effect on bioremediation of crude petroleum contaminated soil has been developed. The model depicts the dependence of enzyme-catalyzed reaction rates on pH and was derived at both mathematical and kinetic levels, with the resulting rate expressions derived as modifications of the Michaelis-Menten equation. The developed equations enables the calculation of equilibrium constants K1, K2, the specific growth rates Vi, as a function of change in pH of the medium, and the optimum hydrogen ion concentration H_opt^+ or (pH)_optof the process. In this work, a study on the biodegradation activities of a hydrocarbon utilizing bacterial, Pseudomonas sp, on a soil contaminated with crude petroleum was carried out to validate the developed model under variable pH conditions (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). The data obtained from experimental study were compared with data generated using the developed kinetic model. Reaction rates obtained from experiment at pH of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are 5.40E+04, 3.46+E05, 6.80+E05, 1.95E+06, 3.56E+06 and 6.87e+05 respectively while the rates of enzyme-catalyzed reaction obtained using the developed kinetic model and at the same pH conditions are 4.98E+04, 3.16E+05, 6.25E+05, 1.41E+06, 3.33E+06, and 5.77E+05 respectively.
Keywords
References (43)
- 1. Merlin FX, Pinvidic P, Chaumery C, Oudot J, Swannell RP, Basseres A, Dalmazzone C, Ducreux J, Lee K, Reilly T. Bioremediation: Results of the field trials of Landevennec (France). InInternational Oil Spill Conference Proceedings 1995 Feb 1 (Vol. 1995, No. 1, pp. 917-918). American Petroleum Institute.
- 2. Singh A, Ward OP, editors. Applied bioremediation and phytoremediation. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013 Jun 29.
- 3. [Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP. Recent advances in petroleum microbiology. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews. 2003 Dec;67(4):503-49.
- 4. Venosa AD, Suidan MT, Wrenn BA, Strohmeier KL, Haines JR, Eberhart BL, King D, Holder E. Bioremediation of an experimental oil spill on the shoreline of Delaware Bay. Environmental science & technology. 1996 Apr 25;30(5):1764-75.
- 5. Wrenn BA, Sarnecki KL, Kohar ES, Lee K, Venosa AD. Effects of nutrient source and supply crude oil biodegradation in continuous-flow beach microcosms. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2006 Jan;132(1):75-84.
- 6. Juhasz AL, Megharaj M, Naidu R. Bioavailability: the major challenge (constraint) to bioremediation of organically contaminated soils. Environmental Science and Pollution Control Series. 2000 Jul 25:217-42.
- 7. Kundu D, Samanta P, Dey S, Dutta D, Rautela R, Chintagunta AD, Kumar NS, Mishra R, Sherpa KC, Muneshwar S, Motghare A. Bioremediation and biodegradation: importance and recent development. InSolid Waste Treatment Technologies 2024 May 17 (pp. 173-208). CRC Press.
- 8. Dua M, Singh A, Sethunathan N, Johri A. Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 2002 Jul;59(2):143-52.
- 9. Mueller JG, Cerniglia CE, Pritchard PH. Bioremediation of environments contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biotechnology Research Series. 1996 Nov 21;6:125-94.
- 10. Riser-Roberts E. Remediation of petroleum contaminated soils: biological, physical, and chemical processes. CRC press; 2020 Nov 25.
- 11. Ajoku GAO, Oduola MK. Kinetic model of pH effect on bioremediation of crude petroleum contaminated soil. 1. Model development. American Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2013 Jun;1(1):6-10.
- 12. Rawe JM, Krietemeyer S, Meagher-Hartzell E. Guide for conducting treatability studies under CERCLA: Biodegradation remedy selection. Interim guidance. Final report, June 1992-August 1993. Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH (United States); 1993 Jan 1.
- 13. Abbassi BE, Shquirat WD. Kinetics of indigenous isolated bacteria used for ex situ bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil.
- 14. A.Y. Itah, and JP Essien, Petroleum hydrocarbon degrading capabilities and growth profile of bacteria from crude oil polluted ultisol and brackish water, Global J. of Pure and Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, pp. 507–511.
- 15. R.C. Sims, ‘Soil remediation techniques at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites: a critical review, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association Reprint Series: RS–15., 1990, pp. 489–514
- 16. L.O. Odokuma, and AA Dickson, Bioremediation of a Crude Oil Polluted Tropical Rain Forest Soil. Global Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2003, pp. 29-40
- 17. R.R. Dupont, RC Sims, JL Sims, and D Sorensen, In Situ biological treatment of hazardous waste-contaminated soils. In Biotreatment systems, vol. II, edited by Donald, L. Wise, CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, FL, 1988.
- 18. E.B. James & David F.O., Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, Mc Graw-Hill Inc, Singapore, 1986.
- 19. Yap, L. F., Lee, Y. K., & Poh, C. L. (1999).Mechanism for phenol tolerance in phenol-degrading Comamonas testosterone strain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 51(6), 833–840.
- 20. Mollaeia, M., Abdollahpoura, S., Atashgahia, S., Abbasia, H., Masoomi, F., Rad, I., et al. (2010). Enhanced phenol degradation by Pseudomonas sp. SA01: gaining insight into the novel single and hybrid immobilizations. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175(1–3), 284–292.
- 21. Wasi, S., Tabrez, S., & Ahmad, M. (2011a). Suitability of immobilized Pseudomonas fluorescens SM1 strain for remediation of phenols, heavy metals and pesticides from water. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 220(1–4), 89–99.
- 22. Wasi, S., Tabrez, S., & Ahmad, M. (2011b). Detoxification potential of Pseudomonas fluorescens SM1 strain for remediation of major toxicants in Indian water bodies. Water,Air, and Soil Pollution, 222(1–4), 39–51.
- 23. Matsumura, F., Benzet, H. J., & Patil, K. C. (1976). Factors affecting microbial metabolism of y-BHC. Journal of Pesticide Science, 1, 3–8.
- 24. Wada, H., Senoo, K., & Takai, Y. (1989). Rapid degradation of 2,-HCH in upland soil after multiple applications. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 35, 71–77.
- 25. Roane, T. M., & Pepper, I. L. (2000). Microbial responses to environmentally toxic cadmium. Microbial Ecology, 38(4), 358–364.
- 26. Lee, S. W., Glickmann, E., & Cooksey, D. A. (2001). Chromosomal locus for cadmium resistance in Pseudomonas putida consisting of a cadmium-transporting ATPase and a MerR family response regulator. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 1437–1444.
- 27. Wang, C. L., Michels, P. C., Dawson, S. C., Kitisakkul, S., Baross, J. A., Keasling, J. D., et al. (1997). Cadmium removal by a new strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in aerobic culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63(10), 4075–4078.
- 28. McLean, J., & Beveridge, T. J. (2001). Chromate reduction by a pseudomonad isolated from a site contaminated with chromated copper arsenate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(3), 1076–1084.
- 29. Megharaj, M., Avudainayagam, S., & Naidu, R. (2003). Toxicity of hexavalent chromium and its reduction by bacteria isolated from soil contaminated with tannery waste. Current Microbiology, 47(1), 51–54.
- 30. Viti, C., Pace, A., & Giovenneti, Y. L. (2003). Characterization of Cr(VI)-resistant bacteria isolated from chromium-contaminated soil by tannery activity. Current Microbiology, 46, 1–5.
- 31. Chung, T.-P., Wu, P.-C., & Juang, R.-S. (2004). Process development for degradation of phenol by Pseudomonas putida in hollow-fiber membrane bioreactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 87(2), 219–227.
- 32. Basha, K. M., Rajendran, A., & Thangavelu, V. (2010). Recent advances in the biodegradation of phenol: a review. Asian Journal of Experimental Biology and Science, 1(2), 219–234
- 33. Lee, S. G., Yoon, B.-D., Park, Y. H., & Oh, H. M. (1998). HM. Isolation of a novel pentachlorophenol-degrading bacterium, Pseudomonas sp. Bu34. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 85, 1–8.
- 34. Kumar, A., Kumar, S., & Kumar, S. (2005). Biodegradation kinetics of phenol and catechol using Pseudomonas putida MTCC 1194. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 22, 151– 159.
- 35. O’Reilly, K. T., & Crawford, R. L. (1989). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 55, 866.
- 36. Lopez, A., Lazaro, N., Priego, J. M., & Marques, A. M. (2000). Effect of pH on the biosorption of nickel and other heavy metals by Pseudomonas fluorescens 4F39. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24, 146–151.
- 37. Shah, S., & Thakur, I. S. (2003). Enzymatic dehalogenation of pentachlorophenol by Pseudomonas fl uorescens of the microbial community from tannery effluent. Current Microbiology, 47, 65–70.
- 38. Barathi, S., & Vasudevan, N. (2001). Utilization of petroleum hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from petroleum contaminated soil. Environment International, 26, 413–416.
- 39. Aboaba, O.A., Aboaba, O.O., Nwachukwu, N.C., Chukwu, E.E. And Nwachukwu, S.C.U. (2007). Evaluation Of Bioremediation Of Agricultural Soils Polluted With Crude Oil By Planting Beans Seeds, Phaseolus Vulgaris. Nature and Science, 5(4), pp. 53–60.
- 40. Hassan Al-Fhdawi, A.A. and Rabee, A.M. (2024), “Influence pH on virulence genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa analyzed by RT-PCR method”, Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR- 10-2022-0244,
- 41. Shikha Shrivastava, Neeta Shweta Kerketta, Uma Kumari and Vinay Kumar Oraon (2024). Effect of pH on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, Vol. 11, (6), www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162), pp: 710–716.
- 42. Okpokwasili (2001). Microbial growth, Total hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria, Vol. 6, pp. 86–93.
- 43. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Stanley JT, Williams ST. (1994). Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. Baltimore, USA: Williamand Wilkins.