STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Polymer & Composites Review Article

Dental Implant Analysis Using the Wear and Hardness Testing Method

  1. Aniket Suresh Paste Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sandip University, Nashik
  2. Subodh A. Shirsath Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sandip University, Nashik

Abstract

We will compare the number of implants from the manufacturer using either an analytical approach or a software-based approach using Minitab software regarding structural dental implants. Several factors influence a dental implant, and new bone grows. The implant surface is one of the elements that have a major impact on the quality of osteointegration. Various techniques and resources have been employed to modify an implant's surface to encourage osseointegration along with an increase in success and survival rates. Adding graphene onto an implant's surface is one such modification. This study summarises data from publications published online over the past ten gives a comprehensive assessment of the effects by adding graphene to dental implants plus discusses the several approaches that involve surface modification. The particular one which results emphasize how crucial it is to select suitable materials that can sustain sustained functional stresses without deteriorating and failing. The design and selection of dental implants are improved by this research, which also improves patient outcomes and the durability of dental restorations. 3D printing, another name for additive manufacturing, has recently attracted attention from all around the world and is growing in importance across several industries. One area of the healthcare industry where 3D printing technology is being used more and more is in the creation and application of dental implants.

Keywords

References (53)

  1. Abouel Maaty FAN, Ragab MA, El-Ghazawy YM, Elfaiedi FI, Abbass MMS, Radwan IA, et al. Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in Contact with Zirconium/Titanium Abutments from Histological and Biological Perspectives: A Concise Review. Cells. 2025;14(2):129. doi:10.3390/cells14020129
  2. Bokobza L. On the Use of Nanoparticles in Dental Implants. Materials. 2024;17(13):3191. doi:10.3390/ma17133191
  3. Hakim LK, Yari A, Nikparto N, Mehraban SH, Cheperli S, Asadi A, et al. The current applications of nano and biomaterials in drug delivery of dental implant. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1). doi:10.1186/s12903-024-03911-9
  4. Pereira T, Kennedy JV, Potgieter J. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019;30:11-18. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003
  5. FerreiraTJ, Vieira MT, Costa J, et al. Manufacturing Dental Implants using Powder Injection Molding. J OrthodEndod. 2016, 2:1.
  6. Saha S, Roy S. Metallic Dental Implants Wear Mechanisms, Materials, and Manufacturing Processes: A Literature Review. Materials. 2022;16(1):161. doi:10.3390/ma16010161
  7. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NRF, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2008;88B(2):579-596. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31264
  8. Chen X, Xie L, Chen J, Du R, Deng F. Design and fabrication of custom-made dental implants. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 2012;26(7):1993-1998. doi:10.1007/s12206-012-0501-9
  9. Boparai KS, Singh R, Hashmi MSJ. Reinforced non-conventional material composites: a comprehensive review. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies. 2020;7(2):333-342. doi:10.1080/2374068x.2020.1783944
  10. Ghinassi B, Di Baldassarre A, D’Addazio G, Traini T, Andrisani M, Di Vincenzo G, et al. Gingival Response to Dental Implant: Comparison Study on the Effects of New Nanopored Laser-Treated vs. Traditional Healing Abutments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(17):6056. doi:10.3390/ijms21176056
  11. Duraccio D, Mussano F, Faga MG. Biomaterials for dental implants: current and future trends. Journal of Materials Science. 2015;50(14):4779-4812. doi:10.1007/s10853-015-9056-3
  12. Alqutaibi AY, Alghauli MA, Aljohani MHA, Zafar MS. Advanced additive manufacturing in implant dentistry: 3D printing technologies, printable materials, current applications and future requirements. Bioprinting. 2024;42:e00356. doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00356
  13. Marchio V, Cinquini C, Alfonsi F, Romeggio S, Stoppaccioli M, Zingari F, et al. Retrospective Analysis of Full-Arch Zirconia Rehabilitations on Dental Implants: Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction. Applied Sciences. 2025;15(1):416. doi:10.3390/app15010416
  14. Büyük FN, Savran E, Karpat F. Review on finite element analysis of dental implants. Journal of Dental Implant Research. 2022;41(3):50-63. doi:10.54527/jdir.2022.41.3.50
  15. Menacho-Mendoza E, Cedamanos-Cuenca R, Díaz-Suyo A. Stress analysis and factor of safety in three dental implant systems by finite element analysis. The Saudi Dental Journal. 2022;34(7):579-584. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.006
  16. Falcinelli C, Valente F, Vasta M, Traini T. Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions. Dental Materials. 2023;39(6):539-556. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002
  17. Jiang X, Yao Y, Tang W, Han D, Zhang L, Zhao K, et al. Design of dental implants at materials level: An overview. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2020;108(8):1634-1661. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36931
  18. Paracchini L, Barbieri C, Redaelli M, Di Croce D, Vincenzi C, Guarnieri R. Finite Element Analysis of a New Dental Implant Design Optimized for the Desirable Stress Distribution in the Surrounding Bone Region. Prosthesis. 2020;2(3):225-236. doi:10.3390/prosthesis2030019
  19. Lin PJ, Su KC. Biomechanical Design Application on the Effect of Different Occlusion Conditions on Dental Implants with Different Positions—A Finite Element Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(17):5826. doi:10.3390/app10175826
  20. Waghmare G, Waghmare K, Bagde S, Deshmukh M, N. Kashyap D, Shahu VT. Materials Evolution in Dental Implantology: A Comprehensive Review. Adv. Res. Appl. Mech. [Internet]. 2024 Aug. 30 [cited 2025 Jan. 27];123(1):75-100. Available from: https://semarakilmu.com.my/journals/index.php/appl_mech/article/view/8028
  21. Srivastava R, Bansal R, Dubey PK, Singh D. A comparative evaluation of masticatory load distribution in different types of prosthesis with varying number of implants: A FEM analysis. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2024;14(3):284-289. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.03.010
  22. Garg A, Gupta S, Tewari N, Srivastav S, Chanda A. Effect of Adhesive Materials in Re-Attachment of Crown and Crown–Root Fractures of Permanent Maxillary Anterior Tooth: A Computational Study. Mathematical and Computational Applications. 2023;28(2):41. doi:10.3390/mca28020041
  23. K. N. C, Namlimhemnatee T, N. H. P, Kumar S, Eram A, Shetty N, et al. Optimizing stress distribution in dental air abrasion through design of experiments: a finite element analysis. Cogent Engineering. 2024;11(1). doi:10.1080/23311916.2024.2380349
  24. SINGH, Sarabjit. Surface Modification Analysis of Dental Implant Materials through Taguchi and RSM Approach for: A Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Instrumentation and Control Engineering, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1&2, p. 6-9, june 2023. ISSN 2456-1398.
  25. Bharadwaz A, Dhar S, Jayasuriya AC. Full factorial design of experiment-based and response surface methodology approach for evaluating variation in uniaxial compressive mechanical properties, and biocompatibility of photocurable PEGDMA-based scaffolds. Biomedical Materials. 2023;18(2):025019. doi:10.1088/1748-605x/acb7bd
  26. Suriyaamporn P, Sahatsapan N, Patrojanasophon P, Opanasopit P, Kumpugdee-Vollrath M, Ngawhirunpat T. Optimization of In Situ Gel-Forming Chlorhexidine-Encapsulated Polymeric Nanoparticles Using Design of Experiment for Periodontitis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2023;24(6). doi:10.1208/s12249-023-02600-0
  27. Gaviria L, Salcido JP, Guda T, Ong JL. Current trends in dental implants. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2014;40(2):50. doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.50
  28. Pérez RA, Gargallo J, Altuna P, Herrero-Climent M, Gil FJ. Fatigue of Narrow Dental Implants: Influence of the Hardening Method. Materials. 2020;13(6):1429. doi:10.3390/ma13061429
  29. ALGHAMDI HS, JANSEN JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dental Materials Journal. 2020;39(2):167-172. doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-140
  30. Samara W, Moztarzadeh O, Hauer L, Babuska V. Dental Implant Placement in Medically Compromised Patients: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2024. doi:10.7759/cureus.54199
  31. Vaidya RY, I.N A, Balakrishnan D, Nakata H, S K, Krishnamoorthy G. Impact of graphene incorporation in dental implants–A scoping review. Heliyon. 2024;10(18):e37751. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37751
  32. Arai Y, Takashima M, Matsuzaki N, Takada S. Marginal bone loss in dental implants: A literature review of risk factors and treatment strategies for prevention. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2024;69(1):12-20. doi:10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_23_00223
  33. Trombelli L, Farina R, Tomasi C, Vignoletti F, Paolantoni G, Giordano F, et al. Factors affecting radiographic marginal bone resorption at dental implants in function for at least 5 years: A multicenter retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2024;35(11):1406-1417. doi:10.1111/clr.14327
  34. Gao J, Pan Y, Gao Y, Pang H, Sun H, Cheng L, et al. Research Progress on the Preparation Process and Material Structure of 3D-Printed Dental Implants and Their Clinical Applications. Coatings. 2024;14(7):781. doi:10.3390/coatings14070781
  35. Manfredini M, Poli PP, Giboli L, Beretta M, Maiorana C, Pellegrini M. Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review. Dentistry Journal. 2024;12(7):200. doi:10.3390/dj12070200
  36. Häggman‐Henrikson B, Ali D, Aljamal M, Chrcanovic BR. Bruxism and dental implants: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2023;51(1):202-217. doi:10.1111/joor.13567
  37. Bokobza L. On the Use of Nanoparticles in Dental Implants. Materials. 2024;17(13):3191. doi:10.3390/ma17133191
  38. Kumar R, Gautam RK. Development of Ti‐10Nb alloy by powder metallurgy processing route for dental application. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2023;112(1). doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35338
  39. Marasli C, Katifelis H, Gazouli M, Lagopati N. Nano-Based Approaches in Surface Modifications of Dental Implants: A Literature Review. Molecules. 2024;29(13):3061. doi:10.3390/molecules29133061
  40. Qiu P, Cao R, Li Z, Fan Z. A comprehensive biomechanical evaluation of length and diameter of dental implants using finite element analyses: A systematic review. Heliyon. 2024;10(5):e26876. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26876
  41. Kupka JR, König J, Al-Nawas B, Sagheb K, Schiegnitz E. How far can we go? A 20-year meta-analysis of dental implant survival rates. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2024;28(10). doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05929-3
  42. Breunig N, Stiller M, Mogk M, Mengel R. Influence of gingival phenotype on crestal bone loss at implants. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2024;10(1). doi:10.1186/s40729-024-00531-4
  43. Komatsu K, Matsuura T, Cheng J, Kido D, Park W, Ogawa T. Nanofeatured surfaces in dental implants: contemporary insights and impending challenges. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2024;10(1). doi:10.1186/s40729-024-00550-1
  44. Zou X, Zheng X, Liang Y, Zhang C, Fan B, Liang J, et al. Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy. International Journal of Oral Science. 2024;16(1). doi:10.1038/s41368-024-00280-5
  45. Hossain N, Mobarak MH, Hossain A, Khan F, Mim JJ, Chowdhury MA. Advances of plant and biomass extracted zirconium nanoparticles in dental implant application. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e15973. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15973
  46. Gupta Y, Iyer R, Dommeti VK, Nutu E, Rana M, Merdji A, et al. Design of dental implant using design of experiment and topology optimization: A finite element analysis study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2020;235(2):157-166. doi:10.1177/0954411920967146
  47. Chaurasia A, Namachivayam A, Koca-Ünsal RB, Lee JH. Deep-learning performance in identifying and classifying dental implant systems from dental imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2024;54(1):3. doi:10.5051/jpis.2300160008
  48. Tchinda AP, Pierson G, Kouitat-Njiwa R, Bravetti P. The Surface Conditions and Composition of Titanium Alloys in Implantology: A Comparative Study of Dental Implants of Different Brands. Materials. 2022;15(3):1018. doi:10.3390/ma15031018
  49. Martinez-Marquez D, Gulati K, Carty CP, Stewart RA, Ivanovski S. Determining the relative importance of titania nanotubes characteristics on bone implant surface performance: A quality by design study with a fuzzy approach. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2020;114:110995. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.110995
  50. Pieniak D, Walczak A, Walczak M, Przystupa K, Niewczas AM. Hardness and Wear Resistance of Dental Biomedical Nanomaterials in a Humid Environment with Non-Stationary Temperatures. Materials. 2020;13(5):1255. doi:10.3390/ma13051255
  51. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Fischer NG, Nojiri K, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, et al. Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2018;54(2):76-87. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002
  52. Cha MS, Lee SW, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Correlation between microhardness and wear resistance of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2021;13(3):127. doi:10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.127
  53. Aktas OC, Puchert K, Vurucu EE, Ersöz B, Veziroglu S, Sen S. A review on nanocomposite coatings in dentistry. Journal of Materials Science. 2024;59(38):17991-18008. doi:10.1007/s10853-024-09915-8
Support