Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology Original Research

Marine Spatial Planning: Implementation of Plans and Strategies in Perspective of Bangladesh

  1. Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar
  2. Teng Xin
  3. Deng Yuncheng

Abstract

Marine spatial planning (MSP) is an internationally recognized planning tool used in coastal countries to utilize information about a particular maritime zone, its resources, and its uses and to develop a comprehensive ocean management system. It is a pragmatic and integrated process to protect the environment when human operations are held at spatial and temporal levels and increase sustainability in marine resources' uses. After two victories with two neighboring countries, India and Myanmar, Bangladesh obtained a significantly defined maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal. Nevertheless, Bangladesh faced several challenges in the management and sustainable use of the resources in this maritime territory in recent years. For proper governance and fruitful management of the resources of the marine environment, Bangladesh needs to develop policies and frameworks associated with MSP. This article provides a brief snapshot of the implementation of plans and strategies of MSP in the context of Bangladesh. Until today, very few policies and legislation have hardly been initiated to bring all the relevant departments under an umbrella for adopting MSP. The government should establish an authorized body to adopt MSP in the Bay of Bengal. The body should initiate integrated policy, coordinate with multi-sectored bodies, and make legislative solid protection and framework. Therefore, effective MSP is required for Bangladesh to achieve sustainable development and protect the marine environment.

Keywords

References (71)

  1. Ramieri E, Bocci M, Markovic M. Linking integrated coastal zone management to maritime spatial
  2. planning: The Mediterranean experience. In: Zaucha J, Gee K, editors. Maritime Spatial Planning:
  3. Past, Present, Future. Springer International Publishing; 2019:271–94. doi:10.1007/978-3-319
  4. Wells S, Ray GC, Gjerde KM, et al. Building the future of MPAs – Lessons from history. Aquat
  5. Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst. 2016;26(Suppl 2):101–25. doi:10.1002/aqc.2680.
  6. Duck RW. Marine spatial planning: Managing a dynamic environment. J Environ Policy Plan.
  7. 2012;14:67-79. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.664406.
  8. Douvere F, Ehler CN. New perspectives on sea use management: Initial findings from European
  9. experience with marine spatial planning. J Environ Manag. 2009;90:77-88. DOI:
  10. 1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.004.
  11. Pennino MG, Brodie S, Frainer A, et al. The missing layers: Integrating sociocultural values into
  12. marine spatial planning. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:848. doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.633198.
  13. Rahman SF. Bangladesh-Myanmar Bilateral Relations and Regional Implications. 2015.
  14. Wahid-Uz-Zaman MGM. Bracing artificial intelligence for socio-economic development:
  15. Opportunities, implications and challenges for Bangladesh. Ndc E-Journal. 2019;18:1–22.
  16. Ansong J, Gissi E, Calado H. An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial
  17. planning process. Ocean Coast Manag. 2017;141:65-81. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.005.
  18. Koehn JZ, Reineman DR, Kittinger JN. Progress and promise in spatial human dimensions research
  19. for ecosystem-based ocean planning. Mar Policy. 2013;42:31–8. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2013.
  20. Hossain MS, Chowdhury SR, Navera UK, et al. Opportunities and Strategies for Ocean and River
  21. Resources Management (Background Paper for Preparation of the 7th Five Year Plan). Food and
  22. Agriculture Organization, Government of Bangladesh; 2014.
  23. Slater AM, Irvine KN, Byg AA, et al. Integrating stakeholder knowledge through modular
  24. cooperative participatory processes for marine spatial planning outcomes. Ecosyst Serv.
  25. 2020;44:101126. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101126.
  26. Asia and Pacific Commission on Agricultural Statistics (APCAS). Agenda Item 6.3: Fisheries
  27. Statistics in Bangladesh: Issues, Challenges, and Plans. 26th Session, the Asia and Pacific
  28. Commission on Agricultural Statistics, Thimphu, Bhutan, 15-19 February 2016. Department of
  29. Fisheries, Bangladesh. 2016.
  30. Portman ME. Marine spatial planning: Achieving and evaluating integration. ICES J Mar Sci.
  31. 2011;68:2191–200. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsr157.
  32. Datta A. (2014). Blue economy an approach to sustainable development: Bangladesh perspective.
  33. [Online] Available from: http://www.indian-ocean.in/Dr.Anjan%20Datta.pdf.
  34. MSP around the world – MSPGLOBAL2030. MSP Roadmap. Available from:
  35. https://www.mspglobal2030.org/msp-roadmap/msp-around-the-world/.
  36. Grip K, Blomqvist S. Marine spatial planning: Coordinating divergent marine interests. Ambio.
  37. 2021;50:1172-1183. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01471-0.
  38. Douvere F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use
  39. management. Mar Policy. 2008;32:762-771. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021.
  40. Global Environment Facility. (2012). Marine Spatial Planning in the Context of the Convention on
  41. Biological Diversity: A Study Carried out in Response to CBD COP 10 Decision X/29. CBD
  42. Technical Series No. 68. [online] Available from: https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-68
  43. Karim MS. Prevention of Pollution of the Marine Environment from Vessels: The Potential and
  44. Limits of the International Maritime Organisation. Springer Cham; 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319
  45. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC)/UNESCO. (2023). Marine Spatial Planning.
  46. [online] IOC/UNESCO. Available from: https://www.ioc.unesco.org/en/marine-spatial-planning.
  47. U E CO. Works op paper ‘ arine patial lanning and ea Use anagement’, aris, France
  48. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_spatial_
  49. Ehler C, Douvere F. Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-Step Approach Toward Ecosystem-Based
  50. Management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere
  51. Programme, [p. 99pp]. doi:10.25607/OBP-43.
  52. Heinrichs B, Gee K. Necessary common minimum requirements for Maritime Spatial Planning
  53. (MSP) in the Baltic Sea. 2nd draft. Plan Bothnia Project. PLAN BOTHNIA. 2011 Nov 14.
  54. Canning R, Earll B. Spatial planning in the coastal and marine environment: Next steps to action.
  55. CoastNET Conference, SOAS, University of London, 1 October 2003, p.9.
  56. Frazão Santos C, Agardy T, Andrade F, et al. Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nature
  57. Sustain. 2020;3:505-516. doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0513-x.
  58. Alam MK. Ocean/blue economy for Bangladesh. [Online] Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
  59. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. Available from: mofl.portal.gov.bd/sites/
  60. default/files/files/mofl.portal.gov.bd/page/d1b6c714_aee6_499f_a473_c0081e81d7dc/Blue%20E
  61. Hassan D. The Great Barrier Reef: Maritime spatial planning. Environ Policy Law. 2013;43.
  62. Alam MA. Marine spatial planning: Bangladesh perspective. Asia Pac J Energy Environ.
  63. 2018;5:67-74. doi:10.18034/apjee.v5i2.254.
  64. Shahnaz MA, Salma U. Prospects and challenges of Blue Economy in Bangladesh. Daily Observer.
  65. 2015 Jan 28. Available from: http://www.sacep.org/pdf/News-Letter/Top-Stories/2016/January/
  66. 2016-01-22/Prospects-and-challenges-of-www.observerbd.com.pdf.
  67. Hassan D, Alam A. Marine spatial planing and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975: An
  68. evaluation. Ocean Coast Manag. 2019;167:188-196. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.015.
  69. Hassan D, Haque E. Marine spatial planning in the Bay of Bengal sub-region in South Asia. In:
  70. Hassan D, Kuokkanen T, Soininen N, editors. Transboundary Marine Spatial Planning and
  71. International Law. U.K.: Routledge; 2015. p. 202-218.
Support