STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology Original Research

Determining the Optimal Thickness of Canal Lining for Enhanced Durability and Efficiency

  1. Birendra Kumar Singh Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Abstract

The thickness of canal lining plays a crucial role in preventing soil erosion caused by the thrust of water exerted in the canal due to standing water and the velocity of water flow. An optimally designed lining must be robust enough to withstand these forces while ensuring minimal seepage and maintaining the structural integrity of the canal. Various materials are used for canal lining, each with its own advantages and suitability for different conditions. Common lining materials include concrete, which offers high durability and resistance to water flow; geomembranes, which are flexible and provide excellent impermeability; and compacted clay, which is cost-effective and environmentally friendly. The choice of lining material and its thickness depends on several factors such as the type of soil, water pressure, environmental conditions, and economic considerations. By effectively selecting and applying the appropriate lining material, it is possible to enhance the canal's efficiency, reduce maintenance costs, and ensure a sustainable water management system. This study explores the different materials used for canal lining, the factors influencing the choice and thickness of the lining, and the benefits of proper lining in ensuring the longevity and effectiveness of canal systems.

Keywords

References (33)

  1. Chahar BR. Design of drainage canals. Irrig Drainage. 2004; 53 (3): 301–312.
  2. Bos MG, Reinink JA, van Velzen HG. A flow resistance equation for smooth open channels. J
  3. Hydrol. 1990; 119 (1–4): 287–299.
  4. Shahin A, Metwally A, Hegazy O. Design of irrigation canal lining. Alexandria Eng J. 2017; 56
  5. Chanson H. The Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow: An Introduction. 2nd edition. Burlington, MA,
  6. USA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004.
  7. Simons DB, Şentürk F. Sediment Transport Technology. 1st edition. Fort Collins, CO, USA: Water
  8. Resources Publications; 1992.
  9. Chow VT. Open-Channel Hydraulics. 1st edition. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Book
  10. Company; 1959.
  11. Ven TE, Arnold K, Simon N, et al. Canal linings to reduce seepage. J Irrig Drainage Div. 1978; 104
  12. (IR1): 47–58.
  13. US Bureau of Reclamation. Design of Small Canal Structures. Denver, CO, USA: United States
  14. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation; 1974.
  15. Bhutta MN, Ramzan M. Impact of concrete lining on canal seepage and waterlogging. Irrig
  16. Drainage Syst. 2002; 16 (2): 149–164.
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization. Irrigation Canal Linings. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture
  18. Organization of the United Nations; 2010.
  19. Chakrabarti SK. Handbook of Offshore Engineering. 1st edition. Amsterdam, Netherlands:
  20. Elsevier; 2005.
  21. Bai Y, Bai Q. Subsea Engineering Handbook. 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Gulf Professional
  22. Publishing; 2018.
  23. Gerwick BC. Construction of Marine and Offshore Structures. 3rd edition. Boca Raton, FL, USA:
  24. CRC Press; 2007.
  25. Mather A, Carter W, McColloch M. Offshore Engineering: An Introduction. London, UK: Thomas
  26. Telford; 2000.
  27. American Petroleum Institute. API RP 2A-WSD: Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing
  28. and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Working Stress Design. 21st edition. Washington,
  29. DC, USA: American Petroleum Institute; 2000.
  30. McCafferty M. Marine and Offshore Pumping and Piping Systems. 1st edition. New York, NY,
  31. USA: PennWell Books; 1999.
  32. Det Norske Veritas. DNV-OS-J101: Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures. Høvik, Norway:
  33. Det Norske Veritas; 2013.
Support