Journal of Offshore Structure and Technology Case Study

Conflict Resolution and Long-term Planning: A Case Study of Bangladesh’s Marine Areas

  1. Mohammad Saydul Islam Sarkar Department of Oceanography, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh
  2. Mritunjoy Mojumder Department of Geography, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Bangladesh has a significant maritime area (118,813 km2 ), about equal to its land area. As a result, this vast marine area has prompted Bangladesh to exploit its maritime resources in a sustainable manner, which has been dubbed the “Blue Economy.” Bangladesh's maritime region is used for a number of activities, including fishing, shipbuilding, shipping, oil and gas exploration, tourism, energy, and military exercises. User-user conflict and user-environment conflict are the two main kinds of conflict in Bangladesh's marine areas. This study is based on a survey of several published research papers, articles, and reports, among other things, and is used to identify roughly various aspects of the marine region. This study reveals that Bangladesh's maritime region offers huge strength and opportunity. However, the strength is not exploited, and the opportunity is not utilized. The paper identifies potential challenges, opportunities, and offers some strategic ways for implementing a longterm management plan in Bangladesh's marine sector. This study discusses potential challenges and opportunities in identifying major conflicts among maritime activities, as well as the role of compatibility matrix analysis in resolving those conflicts. Based on the authors’ fieldwork, ground observation, book studies, and other research, they selected and conducted a compatibility matrix analysis of the existing operations in Bangladesh's marine areas. The compatibility of each use was also taken into account with conflicts between marine operations and biodiversity conservation emerging as the main concerns. A maritime court should be established to ensure the peace and protection of the maritime border; modern technology can be used for exploration, exploitation, conservation, and management of maritime resources; and all stakeholders, whether individuals or groups, should work together to achieve a balanced ecosystem. The purpose of the study is to apply compatibility matrix analysis to resolve maritime region conflicts, which will be useful in determining strategic maritime spatial planning implementation strategies.

Keywords

References (113)

  1. Practical Action. Poor People’s Energy Outlook 2016: National Energy Access Planning from the
  2. Bottom Up. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing; 2016.
  3. AFP CB. Malaysia-Bound Rohingyas: 33 Rescued from Trawler in Bay. The Daily Star. [Online].
  4. November 9, 2018. Available at https://www.thedailystar.net/rohingya%20crisis/human-trafficking-33-malaysia-bound-refugees rescued-bay bengal%021657756#:~:text=Six
  5. %20alleged%20traffickers%20held&text=Bangladesh’s%20coast%0A%20guard%20rescued%20
  6. 33,Bengal%2C%20an%20official%20said%20Wednesday [Accessed July 29, 2024].
  7. Ahammad H, Sujauddin M. Contributions of Ship Recycling in Bangladesh: An Economic
  8. Assessment. London, UK: IMO-NORAD SENSREC Project; 2017. p. 78.
  9. Ahmad H. Bangladesh coastal zone management status and future trends. J Coast Zone Manage.
  10. 2019; 22 (1): 1–7.
  11. Ahmed F, Al Amin AQ, Hasanuzzaman M, Saidur R. Alternative energy resources in Bangladesh
  12. and future prospect. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2013; 25: 698–707.
  13. Ahmed HU. Making the Most of ‘Blue Economy’. The Financial Express. [Online]. July 14, 2018.
  14. Available at https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/making-the-most-of-blueeconomy%021531498218 [Accessed July 29, 2024].
  15. Aksenov Y, Popova EE, Yool A, Nurser AJG, Williams TD, Bertino L, Bergh J. On the future
  16. navigability of Arctic sea routes: high-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice. Mar
  17. Policy. 2017; 75: 300–317.
  18. Aktar S, Alimuzzaman ATM, Mannan S, Sakib N. Initiating marine spatial planning (MSP)
  19. process: resolving conflicts between Chittagong port and other maritime sectors in Bangladesh.
  20. Bangladesh Mar J. 2022; 6 (1): 41–58.
  21. Alam F, Saleque K, Alam Q, Mustary I, Chowdhury H. Indigenous and imported natural gas and
  22. the economic growth of Bangladesh: the challenges ahead. Energy Procedia. 2019; 160: 18–25.
  23. Alam M, Xiangmin X. Marine pollution prevention in Bangladesh: a way forward for implementing
  24. comprehensive national legal framework. Thalassas. 2019; 35 (1): 17–27.
  25. Alam S, Ahammad SU. Shrimp aquaculture in Bangladesh: domestic regulatory responses and
  26. compliance with MEAs. Mar Policy. 2017; 82: 122–133.
  27. Ashikur MR, Rupom RS. SWOT analysis of Bangladesh maritime region for the strategic approach
  28. of Bangladesh Delta Plan-2100. Bangladesh Mar J. 2021; 5 (1): 207–232.
  29. Department of Fisheries Bangladesh. Bangladesh Fisheries Report. Yearbook of Fisheries Statistics
  30. of Bangladesh 2017–18. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Department of Fisheries Bangladesh; 2018.
  31. Banglapedia. Bangladesh Salt Industry. [Online]. 2020. Available at http://en.banglapedia.org/
  32. index.php?title=Salt_Industry#:~:text=Salt%20Industry%20a%0A%20an%20industry%20for,belts
  33. %20of%20Khulna%20and%20Satkhira [Accessed July 29, 2024].
  34. Bangladesh Oil, Gas, and Mineral Exploration. BAPEX. Bapex Annual Report. Dhaka,
  35. Bangladesh: Petrobangla; 2019.
  36. Bari A. Our oceans and the blue economy: opportunities and challenges. Procedia Eng. 2017; 194:
  37. Baten MA, Titumir RAM. Environmental challenges of trans-boundary water resources
  38. management: the case of Bangladesh. Sustain Water Resour Manage. 2016; 2 (1): 13–27.
  39. Ministry of Planning, Bangladesh. BDP-2100. Bangladesh Delta Plan. Dhaka, Bangladesh:
  40. Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh; 2018.
  41. Bissinger J. The maritime boundary dispute between Bangladesh and Myanmar: motivations,
  42. potential solutions, and implications. Asia Policy. 2010; 10 (1): 103–142.
  43. Blau J, Green L. Assessing the impact of a new approach to ocean management: evidence to date
  44. from five ocean plans. Mar Policy. 2015; 56: 1–8.
  45. Bull JW, Jobstvogt N, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Mascarenhas A, Sitas N, Baulcomb C, et al. Strengths,
  46. weaknesses, opportunities and threats: a SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework.
  47. Ecosyst Serv. 2016; 17: 99–111.
  48. Büyüközkan G, Mukul E, Kongar E. Health tourism strategy selection via SWOT analysis and
  49. integrated hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP-MABAC approach. Socio-Econ Plann Sci. 2021; 74:
  50. Chakraborty S, Saha SK, Selim SA. Recreational services in tourism dominated coastal ecosystems:
  51. Bringing the non-economic values into focus. J Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 2020; 30: 100279.
  52. Chattoraj KK. Rohingya issue: changing nature of geopolitical situation and diplomatic relationship
  53. among South-East Asian countries. Res J Soc Sci. 2018; 9 (1): 61–66.
  54. Chaudhury ABR, Chatterji R. Maritime order and connectivity in the Indian Ocean: the renewed
  55. significance of the Bay of Bengal. J Indian Ocean Reg. 2019; 15 (3): 241–244.
  56. Chaudhury ABR. Enhancing India-Bangladesh maritime connectivity in the Bay of Bengal:
  57. possibilities and challenges. Diplomatist. [Online]. January 3, 2020. Available at
  58. https://diplomatist.com/2020/01/03/enhancing-india-bangladesh-maritime-connectivity-inthe-bayof-bengal-possibilities-and-challenges/ [Accessed July 29, 2024].
  59. Chittagong Port Authority (CPA). Revenue Income, Expenditure & Surplus. [Online]. 2020.
  60. Available at http://www.cpa.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/cpa.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/
  61. d5e6bbc7_c89c_47f0_89ae_f95a32972543/2020-07-09-15-18-
  62. 92e8adfc376f2ecab55bf6cf7d7281c9.pdf [Accessed July 29, 2024].
  63. Chittagong Port Authority (CPA) Ordinance. The Chittagong Port Authority Ordinance, 1976.
  64. [Online]. 1976. Available at http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-details-527.html [Accessed July 29,
  65. Curray JR, Emmel FJ, Moore DG. The Bengal fan: morphology, geometry, stratigraphy, history
  66. and processes. Mar Pet Geol. 2002; 19 (10): 1191–1223.
  67. Das K, Aminuzzaman M. Morphological and ecological characterization of xylotrophic fungi in
  68. mangrove forest regions of Bangladesh. J Adv Biol Biotech. 2017; 11 (4): 1–15.
  69. Department of Fisheries. About Department of Fisheries. [Online]. 2018. Available at
  70. http://www.fisheries.gov.bd/site/page/43ce3767-3981-4248-99bd-d321b6e3a7e5/Background
  71. [Accessed July 29, 2024].
  72. Douvere F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use
  73. management. Mar Policy. 2008; 32 (5): 762–771.
  74. Ehler C, Douvere F. Visions for a sea change: report of the First International Workshop on Marine
  75. Spatial Planning, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the Man and the Biosphere
  76. Programme. Paris, France: UNESCO Headquarters; 2007.
  77. Ehler C, Douvere F. Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based
  78. management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere
  79. Programme; 2009.
  80. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020.
  81. Sustainability in Action. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2020.
  82. General Economics Division. Bangladesh: Seventh Five Year Plan FY2016–FY2020 Accelerating
  83. Growth, Empowering Citizens. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Planning Commission Government of the
  84. People’s Republic of Bangladesh; 2015.
  85. Gomes I. Natural Gas in Pakistan and Bangladesh – Current Issues and Trends. Oxford, UK: Oxford
  86. Institute for Energy Studies; 2013.
  87. Gopnik M, Fieseler C, Cantral L, McClellan K, Pendleton L, Crowder L. Coming to the table: early
  88. stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Mar Policy. 2012; 36 (5): 1139–1149.
  89. Gürel E, Tat M. SWOT analysis: a theoretical review. J Int Soc Res. 2017; 10 (51): 994–1006.
  90. Habtemariam BT, Fang Q. Zoning for a multiple-use marine protected area using spatial multicriteria analysis: the case of the Sheik Seid Marine National Park in Eritrea. Mar Policy. 2016; 63:
  91. Haque HME, Dhakal S, Mostafa SMG. An assessment of opportunities and challenges for crossborder electricity trade for Bangladesh using SWOT-AHP approach. Energy Policy. 2020; 137:
  92. Hasan KR, Rahaman MM, Alamgir MZ, Akimoto H. Foreign direct investment and the
  93. Shipbuilding industry: a Bangladesh perspective. Procedia Eng. 2017; 194: 218–223.
  94. Hassan D, Alam A. Marine spatial planning and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975: an
  95. evaluation. Ocean Coast Manage. 2019; 167: 188–196.
  96. Hosen MF. An overview of the statutory laws and regulations relating to the maritime issues of
  97. Bangladesh: loopholes and recommendations. Beijing Law Rev. 2019; 10 (5): 1331–1345.
  98. Hossain F, Islam MA, Al-Mamun A, Naher K, Khan R, Das S, et al. Assessment of trace
  99. contaminants in sediments of the Poshur river nearby Mongla port of Bangladesh. Nucl Sci Appl.
  100. 2016; 25 (1–2): 7–11.
  101. Hossain KA. Ship recycling practice and annual reusable material output from Bangladesh ship
  102. recycling industry. J Fundam Renew Energy Appl. 2017; 7 (5): 1000238.
  103. Hossain MS, Chowdhury SR, Navera UK, Hossain MAR, Imam B, Sharifuzzaman SM.
  104. Opportunities and Strategies for Ocean and River Resources Management. Background Paper for
  105. Preparation of the 7th Five Year Plan. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Planning Commission, Ministry of
  106. Planning, Bangladesh; 2014.
  107. Hussain MG, Failler P, Karim AA, Alam MK. Major opportunities of blue economy development
  108. in Bangladesh. J Indian Ocean Reg. 2018; 14 (1): 88–99.
  109. Institute for Policy, Advocacy, & Governance (IPAG). Maritime Security in Bay of Bengal:
  110. Potential Challenges and Opportunities. 2019. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IPAG.
  111. Islam MM, Shamsuddoha MD. Coastal and marine conservation strategy for Bangladesh in the
  112. context of achieving blue growth and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Environ Sci Policy.
  113. 2018; 87: 45–54.
Support