STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal Of Network security Review Article

3D-Animated Digital Twins in the Metaverse: Security Challenges, Ethical Risks, and Societal Implications

  1. Priyanka Priyadarshini Department of Basic Science and Humanities, Gandhi Institute of Excellent Technocrats
  2. Tarakanta Sahoo Department of Basic Science and Humanities, Gandhi Institute of Excellent Technocrats

Abstract

Metaverse is emerging as an immersive digital space where users interact through virtual environments. Within this space, 3D-animated digital twins act as virtual representations of real individuals, objects, and systems, enabling interaction, simulation, and presence beyond physical boundaries. While these digital replicas provide significant opportunities for engagement and innovation, they also raise critical security and ethical concerns. Security vulnerabilities can lead to identity misuse, impersonation, and unauthorized access, threatening personal safety and trust in virtual platforms. Ethical challenges include issues of consent, ownership, and privacy, particularly when digital twins closely resemble real individuals. Misuse of these representations can result in identity distortion, psychological harm, and social disruption, affecting not only individuals but also communities and institutional credibility. The absence of clear governance frameworks may amplify these risks, creating conflicts between technological capabilities and societal values. This paper adopts a non-technical, interdisciplinary approach that emphasizes ethical awareness, responsible practices, and policy-based safeguards. It explores how security and ethics are interconnected and how addressing both is essential to sustain trust, equity, and inclusion in virtual spaces. By linking technical risks with societal implications, the study highlights the importance of proactive management to prevent harm and ensure accountability. Ultimately, the responsible deployment of digital twins is crucial to unlocking their potential while maintaining safe, ethical, and socially inclusive metaverse environments. Early consideration of these challenges is vital for promoting long-term digital well-being.

Keywords

References (36)

  1. Rosen R, Von Wichert G, Lo G, Bettenhausen KD. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2015;48:567-72. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141.
  2. Liao SM, editor. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2020.
  3. Calo R. Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and road map. Univ Bologna Law Rev. 2018;3:180-218.
  4. Calo R. Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. Calif Law Rev. 2015:513-63.
  5. Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9:27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.
  6. Rossi de Borba JG, Dias Canedo E. Bridging theory and practice: ethical AI user story generator (EAI-USG)—a tool for translating ethical AI requirements into ethical user stories. SSRN [Preprint]. Available from: SSRN 5312104.
  7. Alcaraz C, Lopez J. Digital twin: a comprehensive survey of security threats. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2022;24:1475-503. doi:10.1109/COMST.2022.3171465.
  8. Bhattacharyya DK. Organizational Structure and Design: Text and Cases. Routledge India; 2024.
  9. Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster; 2000.
  10. Yee N, Bailenson JN. The difference between being and seeing: the relative contribution of self-perception and priming to behavioral changes via digital self-representation. Media Psychol. 2009;12:195-209. doi:10.1080/15213260902849943.
  11. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J, Sihn W. Digital Twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2018;51:1016-22. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474.
  12. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 2016.
  13. Tao F, Zhang M, Nee AY. Digital Twin Driven Smart Manufacturing. London: Academic Press; 2019.
  14. Wajcman J. Addressing technological change: the challenge to social theory. Curr Sociol. 2002;50:347-63. doi:10.1177/0011392102050003004.
  15. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  16. Negri E, Fumagalli L, Macchi M. A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017;11:939-48. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198.
  17. Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A, Yon J, Hicks B. Characterising the Digital Twin: a systematic literature review. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2020;29:36-52. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002.
  18. Umbrello S, Van de Poel I. Mapping value sensitive design onto AI for social good principles. AI Ethics. 2021;1:283-96. doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00038-3. PMID:34790942.
  19. Shehab MJ, Kassem I, Kutty AA, Kucukvar M, Onat N, Khattab T. 5G networks towards smart and sustainable cities: a review of recent developments, applications and future perspectives. IEEE Access. 2022;10:2987-3006. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139436.
  20. Uhlemann THJ, Lehmann C, Steinhilper R. The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production system for industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP. 2017;61:335-40. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152.
  21. Schroeder R. Social Theory After the Internet: Media, Technology, and Globalization. London: UCL Press; 2018.
  22. Bailenson J. Experience on Demand: What Virtual Reality Is, How It Works, and What It Can Do. New York (NY): W. W. Norton & Company; 2018.
  23. Floridi L. The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833635.001.0001.
  24. Floridi L. Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016;374:20160112. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0112. PMID:28336791.
  25. Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA. A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett. 2015;3:18-23. doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001.
  26. Fraga-Lamas P, Fernández-Caramés TM. A review on blockchain technologies for an advanced and cyber-resilient automotive industry. IEEE Access. 2019;7:17578-98. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895302.
  27. Lin JM, Latoschik ME. Digital body, identity and privacy in social virtual reality: a systematic review. Front Virtual Real. 2022;3:974652. doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.974652.
  28. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:389-99. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
  29. Gunkel DJ. The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2012. doi:10.7551/mitpress/8975.001.0001.
  30. Fuller A, Fan Z, Day C, Barlow C. Digital twin: enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access. 2020;8:108952-71. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358.
  31. Bruynseels K, Santoni de Sio F, Van den Hoven J. Digital twins in health care: ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm. Front Genet. 2018;9:31. doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00031. PMID:29487613.
  32. Glaessgen E, Stargel D. The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference; 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference; 14th AIAA. 2012. p.1818.
  33. West SM. Data capitalism: redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Bus Soc. 2019;58:20-41. doi:10.1177/0007650317718185.
  34. Sundaravadivazhagan B, S B, Raj P, Kumari KS, editors. Applying Metaverse Technologies to Human–Computer Interaction for Healthcare. Boca Raton (FL): Auerbach Publications; 2025. doi:10.1201/9781003491668.
  35. Kshetri N. Blockchain's roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int J Inf Manage. 2018;39:80-89. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005.
  36. Grieves M, Hua EY, editors. Digital Twins, Simulation, and the Metaverse. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69107-2.
Support