Journal of Advancements in Robotics

Analysis of Solar Tracking System

  1. Mohit Sharma
  2. Chandra Shekhar Gautam

Abstract

AbstractThe utilization of renewable energy resources to produce the electrical power is a rising trend in various countries worldwide. This is especially because these energies help to reduce the greenhouse gases; therefore, don’t become a destructive factor on the ozone layer (O3) and the environment. Besides, the fossil energies are always exposed to price deviation and will eventually end, while the renewable energies don’t show such problems and are freely acquired from the nature. Some of the most important of these energy resources are the energies of the solar and the wind energy. The generation capability of a photovoltaic (PV System) power plant is mostly dependent on the intensity of the sun radiation. On the other hand, the changing of sun position causes different times  and the sun to have a variable shining intensity in different seasons of the year; therefore, some of the solar power plants uses solar tacking systems. This paper discussed the different types of PV system (photovoltaic systems) including fixed panel, photovoltaic solar farms equipped to the single and double axis tracking systems and their effects on the performance of the solar power plants. In normally to determine the position of the sun in the sky, the zenith angles and azimuth angles of it are preferred to extract the relations between the different points of the sun radiation. The result is used to summarize the explanation of the single axis and double axis systems. Keywords: Single axis tracking, double axis tracking, MPPT, Fixed panel solar system, photovoltaic system, solar system, altitude angle, longitude angle, declination angleCite this ArticleMohit Sharma, Chandra Shekhar Gautam. Analysis of Solar Tracking System. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2016; 3(3): 1–8p.

References (13)

  1. Combined Mechanical and Electrical Control of Solar Trackers in (C) PV Power Plants. 13 th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, 2009, 1–5p.
  2. Guo YZ, Cha JZ, Liu W, et al. A System Modeling Method for Optimization of a Single Axis Solar Tracker. ICCASM 2010.
  3. Boicea AV, Di Leo P, Graditi G, et al. Comparison of Operating Parameters i n Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems with Single/Double Sun -Trackers at Different Latitudes. International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, 2010, 130–133p.
  4. Huang YJ, Member I, Kuo TC, et al. The Design and Imple mentation of a Solar Tracking Generating Power System. Eng Lett. 2009; 17: 4, EL_17_4_06.
  5. Visconti P, Ventura V, Tempesta F, et al. Electronic System for Improvement of Solar Plant Efficiency by Optimized Algorithm Implemented in Biaxial Solar Trackers. 10 th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 2011.
  6. Khaligh A, Onar OC. Energy Harvesting, Solar, Wind and Ocean Energy Conversion Systems. CRC Press, 2010.
  7. Solartopo is a private project . [Online] Available at: www.solartopo.com
  8. Optimum Tilt of Solar Panels . [online] Available at: http://www.macslab. com/optsolar.html
  9. Photovoltaic Education Network [Online] Available at: www.pveducation.org
  10. PV-Tech & Solarserver . [Online]. Available at: www.pvresourdes.com
  11. Alami A, Batista R. Performance Analysis of a Large Scale Photovoltaic Solar Grid Connected System. 34 th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference Analysis of Solar Tracking System Sharma and Gautam JoARB (2016) 1-8 © STM Journals 2016. All Rights Reserved Page 8 (PVSC), 2009.
  12. Beltrán JA, González Rubio JL , García- Beltrán CD. Design, Manufacturing and Performance Test of a Solar Tracker Made by an Embedded Control. Fourth Congress of Electronics , Robotics and Automotive Mechanics, 2007.
  13. Solar Radiation Data Associated to Qeshm Island Collected by Renewable Energies Organization of Iran. Cite this Article Mohit Sharma, Chandra Shekhar Gautam. Analysis of Solar Tracking System. Journal of Advancements in Robotics. 2016; 3(3): 1–8p.
Support