STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances Review Article

Analyzing the Cognitive Proficiencies of Artificial Intelligence Within the Legal Paradigm: Prospects Within the Jurisdiction of India

  1. Indra Vijay Singh Department of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Moodlakatte Institute of Technology, Kundapur
  2. Ranvijay Singh High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru
  3. Akash Singh Department of Law, Shree Geet Law College, Lucknow
  4. Pinki Singh Department of Law, Shree Geet Law College, Lucknow

Abstract

The swift progress of artificial intelligence (AI) has become a pivotal factor in various industries, notably affecting the legal sector. This study extensively investigates the substantial effects of AI on legal research and case analysis, mapping out the progression of AI technology within the legal domain. The exploration goes beyond mere acknowledgment of AI‘s presence, delving into a nuanced analysis of its potential advantages and the formidable challenges it poses to traditional legal research methodologies. In examining the landscape of AI-powered tools and algorithms, the paper scrutinizes their capacity to augment and support legal professionals in case analysis, research endeavors, and the generation of valuable insights. This comprehensive review is essential in understanding how AI is not just a technological innovation but a potential game-changer in the efficiency and depth of legal processes. Additionally, the research diligently tackles ethical concerns linked to incorporating AI in the legal sector. It emphasizes the essential requirement for a well-balanced approach that integrates human expertise with AI capabilities, promoting responsible and fair implementation. Through a comprehensive exploration of existing AI applications, this paper aims to present a comprehensive and perceptive view of the considerable transformation AI is instigating in legal research and case analysis, indicating noteworthy implications for the future of the legal profession.

Keywords

References (57)

  1. Levitin A. Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Algorithms. 3rd edition. New York: Pearson; 2011.
  2. Indian Institute of Management Tiruchirappalli, Vimalkumar M, Gupta A, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Sharma D, OP Jindal Global University, et al. Understanding the Effect that Task Complexity has on Automation Potential and Opacity: Implications for Algorithmic Fairness. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction. 2021:104-129. doi:10.17705/1thci.00144
  3. Mittelstadt BD, Allo P, Taddeo M, Wachter S, Floridi L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society. 2016;3(2). doi:10.1177/2053951716679679
  4. Floridi L. The 4th Revolution. How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. 156 p.
  5. Longo A, Scorza G. Intelligenza Artificiale L’impatto Sulle Nostre Vite, Diritti E Libertà. Mondadori Università, Mondadori, Milano; 2020. 26–27.
  6. Friedman B, Nissebaum H. Bias in Computer Systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst. 1996;14(3): 330–347.
  7. University of Helsinki, Reaktor. (2024). How Should We Define AI? [online] Elements of AI. Available from: https://course.elementsofai.com/1/1
  8. Comoglio P. Nuove Tecnologie E Disponibilità Della Prova : L’accertamento Del Fatto Nella Diffusione Delle Conoscenze. Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore; 2018.
  9. Kulkarni P, Joshi P. Artificial Intelligence: Building Intelligent Systems. India: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.; 2015.
  10. Mittelstadt B, Russell C, Wachter S. Explaining Explanations in AI. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2019:279-288. doi:10.1145/3287560.3287574
  11. Gunning D, Stefik M, Choi J, Miller T, Stumpf S, Yang GZ. XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence. Science Robotics. 2019;4(37). doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120
  12. Barredo Arrieta A, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion. 2020;58:82-115. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
  13. Rai A. Explainable AI: from black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2019;48(1):137-141. doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5
  14. Samek W, Binder A, Montavon G, Lapuschkin S, Muller KR. Evaluating the Visualization of What a Deep Neural Network Has Learned. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2017;28(11):2660-2673. doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2599820
  15. Wick MR, Thompson WB. Reconstructive expert system explanation. Artificial Intelligence. 1992;54(1-2):33-70. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90087-e
  16. Kim PT. Data-driven discrimination at work. William & Mary Law Review. 2017;48:857-936.
  17. Doran D, Schulz S, Besold TR. What does explainable AI really mean? A new conceptualization of perspectives. In: Besold TR, Kutz O, eds. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Comprehensibility and Explanation in AI and ML 2017 co-located with 16th International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2017), Bari, Italy, November 16th and 17th, 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2071. Aachen, Germany: CEUR-WS.org; 2017. Available from: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2071/CExAIIA_2017_paper_2.pdf.
  18. Roscher R, Bohn B, Duarte MF, Garcke J. Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveries. IEEE Access. 2020;8:42200-42216. doi:10.1109/access.2020.2976199
  19. Samek W, Montavon G, Lapuschkin S, Anders CJ, Muller KR. Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2021;109(3):247-278. doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3060483
  20. Murdoch WJ, Singh C, Kumbier K, Abbasi-Asl R, Yu B. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(44):22071-22080. doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116
  21. Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Russell C. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harv J Law Technol. 2018;31(2):841-87.
  22. Roscher R, Bohn B, Duarte MF, Garcke J. Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveries. IEEE Access. 2020;8:42200-42216. doi:10.1109/access.2020.2976199
  23. Mittelstadt B, Russell C, Wachter S. Explaining Explanations in AI. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2019:279-288. doi:10.1145/3287560.3287574
  24. Doshi-Velez F, Kortz M, Budish R, Bavitz C, Gershman SJ, O'Brien D, et al. Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3064761
  25. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. Brussels: COM(2021) 206 final; 2021/0106(COD). 2021 Apr 21.
  26. European Commission. A Digital Market Strategy for Europe. COM(2015) 192 final. 2015 May 6. European Commission. Building a European Data Economy. COM(2017) 9 final. 2017 Jan 10. European Commission. Artificial Intelligence for Europe. COM(2018) 237 final. 2018 Apr 25.
  27. European Economic and Social Committee Opinion. Artificial intelligence – The consequences of artificial intelligence on the (digital) single market, production, consumption, employment and society (own-initiative opinion). Off J Eur Union. 2017 Sep 6;C 288:1-8. European Economic and Social Committee 526th EESC Plenary Session of 31 May and 1 June 2017. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Artificial intelligence – The consequences of artificial intelligence on the (digital) single market, production, consumption, employment and society’ (own-initiative opinion). 2017/C 288/01.
  28. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. 2015/2103(INL). 2017 Feb 16.
  29. High-level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission; 2019. von der Leyen U. A Union that Strives for More. My Agenda for Europe. Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission 2019-2024. European Commission. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European Approach to Excellence and Trust. COM(2020) 65 final. 2020 Feb 19.
  30. Annex I, Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Approaches referred to in Article 3. In: Annexes to the Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021.
  31. Annex I, Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Approaches referred to in Article 3. In: Annexes to the Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. lt. c).
  32. Annex I, Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Approaches referred to in Article 3. In: Annexes to the Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. lt. b).
  33. Annex I, Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Approaches referred to in Article 3. In: Annexes to the Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. lt. a).
  34. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 3(1).
  35. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. “2. Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal,” point 5.2.1.
  36. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. recital 6.
  37. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 4.
  38. Commission Staff Working Document. Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment Report. Accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. SWD(2021) 85 final. Brussels; 2021.
  39. Veale M, Zuiderveen Borgesius F. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International. 2021;22(4):97-112. doi:10.9785/cri-2021-220402
  40. Decision No 768/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on a common framework for the marketing of products, and repealing Council Decision 93/465/EEC. Off J Eur Union. 2008;L 218:82.
  41. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 16.
  42. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 6(2).
  43. Annex III, High-Risk AI Systems referred to in Article 6(2). In: Annexes to the Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021.
  44. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 13.
  45. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 29(1).
  46. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 13(1).
  47. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 13(2).
  48. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 13(3).
  49. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 13(3)(iii).
  50. Proposal for Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Brussels; 2021. art. 13(3)(v).
  51. R. Casaluce, Exploring Trial Courts Legal Databases: Part 2 – Length of legal documents, in https://www.predictivejurisprudence.eu/exploring-trial-courts-legal-databases-part-2-length-of-legal-documents/, 2021.
  52. Predictive Justice, Anonymization model, in https://www.predictivejurisprudence.eu/the_project/anonymization-model/.
  53. Algorithm Watch, Automating Society Report 2020, Berlin, AlgorithmWatch gGmbH, 2020, 151 p.
  54. N. Smuha, Feedback from Legal, Ethical & Accountable Digital Society (LEADS) Lab, University of Birmingham, in https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12527-Artificial-intelligence-ethical-and-legal-requirements/F2665480_en, 2021.
  55. See Amram, High-risk database and the new regulation on AI, SoBigData++ and LeADS joint Awareness Panel, 6.07.2021, ScuolaSantAnna, in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VDsDBBOkxY&list=WL&index=31, 2021, 1:53:24 et seq.
  56. See Licari, Predictive Justice. Towards a fully automated data-driven platform for Legal Analytics, SoBigData++ and LeADS joint Awareness Panel, 6.07.2021, ScuolaSantAnna, 2021, 1:35:36 et seq, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VDsDBBOkxY&list=WL&index=31
  57. Doshi-Velez F, Kortz M, Budish R, Bavitz C, Gershman SJ, O'Brien D, et al. Accountability of AI Under the Law: The Role of Explanation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3064761
Support