STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Urban Design and Development Original Research

Assessing Utility of Parks: A Study of Parks in Raipur, India

  1. Kukil Sharma Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology Raipur,
  2. Khushboo Sharma Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology Raipur,
  3. Vivek Agnihotri Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology Raipur

Abstract

With the rapid growth of urbanization in India, urban parks are taking center stage as vital recreational spaces and community gathering spots. As cities continue to densify and open spaces shrink, public parks increasingly serve as essential infrastructure that supports physical health, social interaction, and environmental well-being. In addition to offering leisure and recreation, urban parks contribute to urban resilience by improving microclimatic conditions and enhancing the overall quality of life. Numerous developed nations have recently acknowledged the vital role of multi-functional public parks in fostering sustainable city development. Conversely, many existing public parks in developing nations suffer neglect or underuse. This study aims to evaluate the usability of parks and examine the determinants affecting the utilization of public parks in Raipur, India. It is a rapidly growing mid-sized city, presenting an appropriate context to assess how urban parks function within evolving urban environments. Parks were chosen based on their location, size, and amenities offered to ensure a representative assessment of different typologies of public open spaces. A total of three parks were examined, and an empirical study was conducted to determine variations in physical occupancy rates. We employed the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) at the chosen park sites to collect data on the number of users, physical activity levels, and estimated ages. Through systematic observation and comparative analysis, this paper emphasizes vital factors in designing excellent public spaces for urban environments and offers a framework for creating successful public space designs. The designs that can encourage inclusivity, active use, and long-term sustainability in rapidly urbanizing cities.

Keywords

References (34)

  1. Aram F, Solgi E, Holden G. The role of green spaces in increasing social interactions in neighborhoods with periodic markets. Habitat International. 2019;84:24-32. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.12.004
  2. Neema MN, Maniruzzaman KM, Ohgai A. Greenery-based model of green urbanism for developing a sustainable healthy livable city – Dhaka city perspective. In: Apduhan B, Nguyen HQ, Misra S, Taniar D, Gervasi O, Murgante B, editors. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Science and Its Applications; 2013; pp. 207–211.
  3. Collomb N. The governance and management of public green spaces. Handbook on Green Infrastructure. 2015. doi:10.4337/9781783474004.00027
  4. Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA. Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0153211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153211
  5. Chu YT, Li D, Chang PJ. Effects of Urban Park Quality, Environmental Perception, and Leisure Activity on Well-Being among the Older Population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(21):11402. doi:10.3390/ijerph182111402
  6. Tiesdell S, Carmona M. Urban Design Reader. 2007. doi:10.4324/9780080468129
  7. Hami A, Maulan S, Mariapan M, Shahhosseini H. Users’ preferences of usability and sustainability of old urban park in Tabriz, Iran. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2011;5:1899–1905.
  8. Lahoti S, Lahoti A, Saito O. Benchmark assessment of recreational public Urban Green space provisions: A case of typical urbanizing Indian City, Nagpur. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2019;44:126424. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126424
  9. Biernacka M, Kronenberg J, Łaszkiewicz E. An integrated system of monitoring the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban parks and green squares. Applied Geography. 2020;116:102152. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102152
  10. Mahmoudkhani M, Feghhi J, Makhdoum M, Bahmani O. Evaluation of the recreational capability and designing of the woodsy promenade. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020;23(5):8062-8075. doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00947-z
  11. Dade MC, Mitchell MGE, Brown G, Rhodes JR. The effects of urban greenspace characteristics and socio-demographics vary among cultural ecosystem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2020;49:126641. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126641
  12. Ewing R. Can the Physical Environment Determine Physical Activity Levels? Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 2005;33(2):69-75. doi:10.1097/00003677-200504000-00003
  13. Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005;28(2):159-168. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
  14. McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place. 2010;16(4):712-726. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
  15. Slater S, Pugach O, Lin W, Bontu A. If You Build It Will They Come? Does Involving Community Groups in Playground Renovations Affect Park Utilization and Physical Activity? Environment and Behavior. 2016;48(1):246-265. doi:10.1177/0013916515614368
  16. SIA A, TAN PY, KIM YJ, ER KBH. Use and non-use of parks are dictated by nature orientation, perceived accessibility and social norm which manifest in a continuum. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2023;235:104758. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104758
  17. Gearin E, Kahle C. Teen and Adult Perceptions of Urban Green Space Los Angeles. Children, Youth and Environments. 2006;16(1):25-48. doi:10.1353/cye.2006.0037
  18. Zhao J, Xu W, Li R. Visual preference of trees: The effects of tree attributes and seasons. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2017;25:19-25. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.015
  19. Gatalska N, Oleksiichenko N. Methodological approaches to assess the aesthetics of park environment. 2019.
  20. Konijnendijk CC, Annerstedt M, Nielsen AB, Maruthaveeran S. Benefits of urban parks: a systematic review. Copenhagen & Alnarp: International Federation of Parks and Recreation Administration (IFPRA); 2013.
  21. Subramanian D, Jana A. Design Dichotomy: Impact of Design Intervention on the Recreational Open Spaces of Urban India—A Photo Essay. Berkeley Planning Journal. 2018;30(1). doi:10.5070/bp330137637
  22. Jogdande A, Bandyopadhyay A. Identification of Relationship between the Quality and Uses of Public Parks in India. Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2023;11(1):142-158. doi:10.13189/cea.2023.110112
  23. McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2006;3(s1):S208-S222. doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208
  24. Jayantha K, Ariyawansa R, Kumara UA. Park (Uyana): Conceptualization. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021;9(5):144-157. doi:10.36347/sjahss.2021.v09i05.002
  25. Dong J, Guo R, Guo F, Guo X, Zhang Z. Pocket parks-a systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters. 2023;18(8):083003. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ace7e2
  26. Abdelhamid MM, Elfakharany MM. Improving urban park usability in developing countries: Case study of Al-Shalalat Park in Alexandria. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2020;59(1):311-321. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.042
  27. Parra DC, McKenzie TL, Ribeiro IC, Ferreira Hino AA, Dreisinger M, Coniglio K, et al. Assessing Physical Activity in Public Parks in Brazil Using Systematic Observation. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(8):1420-1426. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.181230
  28. Li J, Fu J, Gao J, Zhou R, Wang K, Zhou K. Effects of the spatial patterns of urban parks on public satisfaction: evidence from Shanghai, China. Landscape Ecology. 2023;38(5):1265-1277. doi:10.1007/s10980-023-01615-z
  29. Ministry of Urban Development. Urban and regional development plans formulation and implementation (URDPFI) guidelines. Volume 1. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India; 2014.
  30. Town and Country Planning Organisation. Urban Greening Guidelines, 2014. New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India; 2014.
  31. Delhi Development Authority. Master Plan of Delhi 2021. New Delhi: Delhi Development Authority; 2007.
  32. Bureau of Indian Standards. National Building Code of India 2005. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards; 2005.
  33. Ministry of Urban Development. Revised City Development Plan for Raipur. New Delhi: Government of India; 2014. p. 1–151.
  34. Ministry of Urban Development. Advisory on Conservation and Restoration of Water Bodies in Urban Areas. New Delhi: Government of India; 2013.