STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Satellite Remote Sensing Original Research

Configuring Connectivity: Cisco Packet Tracer DHCP Server Best Practices

  1. Sanskruti Karnewaer Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management, Amravati
  2. Sushil Bakhtar Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, Prof Ram Meghe College of Engineering and Management, Amravati

Abstract

In internet protocol (IP) networks, the dynamic host configuration protocol, or DHCP, is a network administration protocol that uses an architecture based on clients and servers to dynamically allocate internet protocol (IP) addresses and other interface characteristics to devices that are connected to the network. It explains routing between the ISP and the campus router uses a static route between the ISP and the gateway, and a default route between the gateway and the ISP. The loopback function domain on the ISP router identifies the ISP connection to the World Wide Web. You can use any router that satisfies the interface criteria. This covers the subsequent items and all conceivable pairings of them: 800, 1600, 1700, 2500 and 2600 series routers and identified the interface identifiers to be used based on the equipment in the lab. The configuration output used in this lab is produced from 1721 series routers. Any other router used may produce slightly different output. conduct the following steps on each router unless specifically instructed otherwise.

Keywords

References (10)

  1. Nichols K, Blake S, Baker F, Black D. Definition of the differentiated services field (DS field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 headers. 1998 Dec. 2. R. Geib, D. Black, Diffserv-interconnection classes, and practice, 2017, (RFC 8100 (Informational)). (2017-03-09). [Online]. Available from https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8100/
  2. McQuistin S, Perkins CS. Is Explicit Congestion Notification usable with UDP? Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference. 2015:63-69. doi:10.1145/2815675.2815716
  3. AT&T, Class of service data collection document for AT&T managed internet service (mis), 2010. https://carecentral.att.com/downloads/Class_of_Service.pdf
  4. Augustin B, Cuvellier X, Orgogozo B, Viger F, Friedman T, Latapy M, et al. Avoiding traceroute anomalies with Paris traceroute. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. 2006:153-158. doi:10.1145/1177080.1177100
  5. Bless, K. Nichols, K. Wehrle, A lower effort per-domain behavior (PDB) for differentiated services, 2003, RFC 3662 (IETF). The Internet Society (2003). [Online]. Available from https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3662
  6. Terzis, B. Braden, S. Vincent, L. Zhang, RSVP diagnostic messages, 2000, (RFC 2745). (Proposed Standard))
  7. Flach, E. Katz-Bassett, R. Govindan, Quantifying violations of destination-based for-warding on the internet, in: Proc. of ACM IMC’12, Boston (USA), pp. 265–272.
  8. R. Learmonth, A. Lutu, G. Fairhurst, D. Ros, Ö. Alay, Path transparency measurements from the mobile edge with PATHspider, in: Proc. of IEEE/IFIP TMA’17, Dublin, pp. 1–6
  9. Murray, T. Koziniek, The state of enterprise network traffic in 2012, in: IEEE APCC 2012, Berlin, pp. 179–184
  10. Detal G, Hesmans B, Bonaventure O, Vanaubel Y, Donnet B. Revealing middlebox interference with tracebox. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Internet measurement conference 2013 Oct 23 (pp. 1-8).