International Journal of Orthopedic Nursing and Practices Original Research

Effectiveness of Moist Heat Application on Elderly Orthopedic Clients at Selected Urban Community Area, Bengaluru

  1. Princy P. Hina college of Nursing

Abstract

Pain is a distressing sensory and emotional experience that arises from actual or potential tissue damage. It is a multifaceted phenomenon that extends beyond physical discomfort, encompassing emotional and psychological aspects as well. Individuals who recognize that pain management not only enhances comfort but also accelerates the healing process are more inclined to seek or administer appropriate treatment. In order to educate the elderly orthopedic clients, this study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of moist heat application on elderly orthopedic clients at selected urban community area, Bengaluru. A pre-experimental design, with non-probability convenient sampling method was used. Information was collected from 50 elderly orthopedic clients at selected urban community area, using the numerical pain rating scale. Majority (41.7%) of respondentsbelongs to the age group of 65–70 years, 58% of respondents were females, 68% were Hindus, 65% of respondents were married, 34% of respondents were not having formal education, 48% of subjects were retired and not working, 54% of respondents had monthly income of Rs. 5,001–10.000, and 58% of respondents had associated illnesses like hypertension, diabetes mellitus and other chronic disorders. The respondents had a pre-test mean score of 4.46 with a standard deviation of 1.06. In contrast, the post-test results showed a mean score of 2.29 and a standard deviation of 0.08. The pooled standard deviation of post-test and pre-test is 0.05, independent ‘t’ value is 15.14, df is 23 and probability of ‘t’ is 2.07. Since the independent ‘t’ value is greater than the probability of ‘t’, the application of moist heat is effective for the reduction of pain among elderly orthopedic clients and thus the hypothesis is accepted. Analysis of the study showed that there is no significant association between pain scale rate and socio-demographic variables such as age, gender, education status, family income and associated illness. The level of significance is at 5% level (P<0.05).

Keywords

References (13)

  1. Kaur P, Walia I, Saini SK. Study on intensity of knee joint pain by ‘Application of Moist Heat’ among geriatric populatio (s≥ 60 years of age). Nursing & Midwifery Research Journal. 2007;3(4):162-171. doi:10.1177/0974150x20070403
  2. Wang Y, Lu H, Li S, Zhang Y, Yan F, Huang Y, et al. Effect of cold and heat therapies on pain relief in patients with delayed onset muscle soreness: A network meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2022;54:jrm00258. doi:10.2340/jrm.v53.331
  3. Clijsen R, Stoop R, Hohenauer E, Aerenhouts D, Clarys P, Deflorin C, et al. Local Heat Applications as a Treatment of Physical and Functional Parameters in Acute and Chronic Musculoskeletal Disorders or Pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2022;103(3):505-522. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.015
  4. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, Reggars JW, Esterman AJ. A Cochrane Review of Superficial Heat or Cold for Low Back Pain. Spine. 2006;31(9):998-1006. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000214881.10814.64
  5. Crowe M, Whitehead L, Jo Gagan M, Baxter D, Panckhurst A. Self‐management and chronic low back pain: a qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010;66(7):1478-1486. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05316.x
  6. Oosterveld FGJ, Rasker JJ. Effects of local heat and cold treatment on surface and articular temperature of arthritic knees. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1994;37(11):1578-1582. doi:10.1002/art.1780371104
  7. HeinrichsK.Superficial thermal modalities.In:Canine Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy. Elsevier; 2003; 277–288.Available from: http://www.sportsperformance.org/pspi/About_Me_ files/heinrichs_cold_hot_physical_therapy_canine.pdf
  8. Malanga GA, Yan N, Stark J. Mechanisms and efficacy of heat and cold therapies for musculoskeletal injury. Postgraduate Medicine. 2014;127(1):57-65. doi:10.1080/00325481.2015.992719
  9. Denegar C. Preferences for heat, cold, or contrast in patients with knee osteoarthritis affect treatment response. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2010:199. doi:10.2147/cia.s11431
  10. Aciksoz S, Akyuz A, Tunay S. The effect of self‐administered superficial local hot and cold application methods on pain, functional status and quality of life in primary knee osteoarthritis patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(23-24):5179-5190. doi:10.1111/jocn.14070
  11. Petrofsky. Moist Heat or Dry Heat for Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research. 2013. doi:10.4021/jocmr1521w
  12. Petrofsky J, Berk L, Bains G, Khowailed IA, Lee H, Laymon M. The Efficacy of Sustained Heat Treatment on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2017;27(4):329-337. doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000000375
  13. Yıldırım N, Filiz Ulusoy M, Bodur H. The effect of heat application on pain, stiffness, physical function and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2010;19(7-8):1113-1120. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03070.x