STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Molecular Biotechnological Research Original Research

Challenges of Upgrading Local Cattle with Exotic Breeds: Genetic, Environmental, Economic, and Sustainability Trade-offs

  1. Md. Emran Hossain Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chattogram-4225,

Abstract

The practice of upgrading local cattle with exotic breeds has gained popularity as a strategy to enhance milk and meat production. While this approach holds potential for improving productivity, it also presents a range of challenges that need careful consideration. This study examines the genetic, environmental, economic, and sustainability trade-offs associated with upgrading local cattle with exotic breeds. From a genetic perspective, upgrading can result in the dilution of traits specific to indigenous breeds, such as disease resistance and adaptability to local conditions. Environmental challenges arise from the reduced resilience of crossbred animals to harsh climates and resource-limited environments, necessitating more intensive management practices. Economically, upgrading often leads to increased input costs, including feed, healthcare, and specialized breeding programs, which may not be sustainable in low-resource farming systems. Furthermore, the long-term sustainability of upgrading efforts is questioned due to the risk of genetic erosion and the dependence on external resources. This study highlights the complexities of upgrading and emphasizes the need for balanced approaches that consider both the potential benefits and the inherent limitations of such practices. Recommendations for policy and management strategies are provided to mitigate the adverse effects and ensure that upgrading initiatives align with sustainable livestock development goals.

Keywords

References (75)

  1. N. G. Hegde, “Impact of crossbreeding and upgrading of nondescript cattle and buffaloes on livestock quality and income,” Indian J. Anim. Sci., vol. 88, no. 5, pp.
  2. 606–611, 2018, doi:10.56093/ijans.v88i5.80009.
  3. A. A. Kudinov, J. Juga, P. Uimari, E. A. Mäntysaari, I. Strandén, and K. V Plemyashov, “Upgrading Dairy Cattle Evaluation System in Russian Federation,”
  4. Interbull Bull., vol. 51, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/upgrading-dairy-cattle-evaluation-
  5. system-in-russian-federation
  6. E. V. O. Ondigi, Factors influencing the adoption of Cattle farming upgrading technology in Nyamira District, Kenya. erepository.uonbi.ac.ke, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/4814
  7. E. Silvaş, “Upgrading technology of raising cattle,” 1998.
  8. V. G. Oguĭ, N. G. Bondarenko, R. P. Bykova, and L. P. Pikash, Upgrading Russian Simmental cattle to Holstein. cabidigitallibrary.org, 1991. doi:10.5555/19910191025.
  9. E. Galukande, H. Mulindwa, M. Wurzinger, R. Roschinsky, A. O. Mwai, and J.
  10. Galukande E, Mulindwa H, Wurzinger M, Roschinsky R, Mwai AO, Sölkner J. Cross-breeding cattle for milk production in the tropics: achievements, challenges and opportunities. Animal Genetic Resources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales. 2013;52:111-125. doi:10.1017/s2078633612000471
  11. D. Pilling and I. Hoffmann, “Climate change and animal genetic resources for food and agriculture: state of knowledge, risks and opportunities,” FAO CGRFA Backgr. Study Pap., vol. 53, p. 28, 2011.
  12. Prayaga KC, Henshall JM. Adaptability in tropical beef cattle: genetic parameters of growth, adaptive and temperament traits in a crossbred population. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2005;45(8):971-983. doi:10.1071/ea05045
  13. Naskar S, Gowane GR, Chopra A. Strategies to Improve Livestock Genetic Resources to Counter Climate Change Impact. Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation. 2015:441-475. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2265-1_25
  14. E. Malovec, The results and further upgrading of dairy cattle in the Slovak Republic. cabidigitallibrary.org, 1982. doi:10.5555/19850186788.
  15. E. Malovec, The effect of upgrading cattle in Slovakia. cabidigitallibrary.org, 1983. doi:10.5555/19850186947.
  16. SUTARNO S, SETYAWAN AD. Review: Genetic diversity of local and exotic cattle and their crossbreeding impact on the quality of Indonesian cattle. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity. 2015;16(2). doi:10.13057/biodiv/d160230
  17. A. Milyukov, Upgrading dairy cattle of domestic breeds. cabidigitallibrary.org, 1987. doi:10.5555/19890168104.
  18. Vollema AR, Groen AF. Genetic Parameters of Longevity Traits of an Upgrading Population of Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 1996;79(12):2261-2267. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76603-1
  19. Mirkena T, Duguma G, Haile A, Tibbo M, Okeyo AM, Wurzinger M, et al. Genetics of adaptation in domestic farm animals: A review. Livestock Science. 2010;132(1-3):1-12. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.003
  20. A. Kumaresan, K. Elango, T. K. Datta, and J. M. Morrell, “Cellular and Molecular Insights Into the Etiology of Subfertility/Infertility in Crossbred Bulls (Bos taurus ×
  21. Bos indicus): A Review,” Front. Cell Dev. Biol., vol. 9, p. 696637, 2021, doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.696637.
  22. M. Atikul Alam, M. Musharraf Uddin Bhuiyan, M. Sonia Parvin, M. Moshiur Rahman, and F. Yeasmin Bari, “Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Prevalence of Reproductive Diseases and Its Associated Risk Factors in Crossbred Dairy Cows Article Info Abstract,” Res. Agric., Livest. Fish, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2014.
  23. R. Wakchaure et al., “Importance of Heterosis in Animals : A Review,” Int. J. Adv.Eng. Techonology Innov. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2015.
  24. F. D. Kirkpatrick, “Crossbreeding in beef cattle,” Programs Agric. Nat. Resour. Univ. Tennessee Inst. Agric. USA, 2017.
  25. K. Lwaho, “Marketing strategies and upgrading opportunities in the indigenous beef cattle value chain in Mwanza region, Tanzania,” 2014, Sokoine University of Agriculture. [Online]. Available:http://41.73.194.142:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/508
  26. A. Pal and A. K. Chakravarty, “Disease resistance for different livestock species,” Genet. Breed. Dis. Resist. Livest., pp. 271–296, 2020, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816406- 8.00019-x.
  27. Magne MA, Quénon J. Dairy crossbreeding challenges the French dairy cattle sociotechnical regime. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2021;41(2). doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00683-2
  28. Assan N, Muteyo E, Masama E, Mafigu T, Mujati T. Crossbreeding and its implication for small-scale animal agriculture in Africa: Outcomes, both positive and negative, and future prospects. Advances in Modern Agriculture. 2024;5(2):2362. doi:10.54517/ama.v5i2.2362
  29. Cooke RF, Cardoso RC, Cerri RLA, Lamb GC, Pohler KG, Riley DG, et al. Cattle adapted to tropical and subtropical environments: genetic and reproductive considerations. Journal of Animal Science. 2020;98(2). doi:10.1093/jas/skaa015
  30. CV S. Cross-breeding in Cattle for Milk Production: Achievements, Challenges and Opportunities in India-A Review. Advances in Dairy Research. 2015;4(3). doi:10.4172/2329-888x.1000158
  31. V. P. Belsare and V. Pandey, “Management of heat stress in dairy cattle and buffaloes for optimum productivity,” J. Agrometeorol., no. SPECIAL ISSUE 2, pp. 365–368,2008.
  32. Sørensen MK, Norberg E, Pedersen J, Christensen LG. Invited Review: Crossbreeding in Dairy Cattle: A Danish Perspective. Journal of Dairy Science. 2008;91(11):4116-4128. doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1273
  33. Leroy G, Baumung R, Boettcher P, Scherf B, Hoffmann I. Review: Sustainability of crossbreeding in developing countries; definitely not like crossing a meadow…. animal. 2016;10(2):262-273. doi:10.1017/s175173111500213x
  34. Yadav B, Singh G, Wankar A. Acclimatization dynamics to extreme heat stress in crossbred cattle. Biological Rhythm Research. 2019;52(4):524-534. doi:10.1080/09291016.2019.1610627
  35. G. Mekuriaw and A. Kebede, “a Review on Indigenous Cattle Genetic Resources in Ethiopia: Adaptation, Status and Survival,” Online J. Anim. Feed Res., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 125–137, 2015.
  36. Megersa Aera Ayano, “Reproductive and Productive Performances of Crossbred and Indigenous Dairy Cattle under Rural, peri-urban and Urban Dairy Farming Systems in West Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia,” pp. 1–111, 2016.
  37. Widi TSM, Udo H, Oldenbroek K, Budisatria IGS, Baliarti E, der Zijpp AV. Designing genetic impact assessment for crossbreeding with exotic beef breeds in mixed farming systems. Outlook on Agriculture. 2020;50(1):34-45. doi:10.1177/0030727020915206
  38. M. Kargo, P. Madsen, and E. Norberg, “Short communication: Is crossbreeding only beneficial in herds with low management level?,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 95, no. 2, pp.
  39. 925–928, 2012, doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4707.
  40. B. R. Mangurkar, “A Study on some of the economic characters of gir with particular
  41. reference to its suitability for upgrading the non-descript cattle at ahmednagar,” 1967, krishikosh.egranth.ac.in. [Online]. Available: https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/items/0cbcc076-ab7b-482e-bb8a-32dcedab4771
  42. J. Ďurečko, A zootechnical and economical evaluation of upgrading Slovakian Pied
  43. cattle with Holstein-Friesian and Ayrshire cattle. cabidigitallibrary.org, 1988. doi:10.5555/19890174614.
  44. R. M. J. Kadigi, I. L. Kadigi, G. H. Laswai, and J. J. Kashaigili, “Value chain of indigenous cattle and beef products in Mwanza region, Tanzania: market access,
  45. linkages and opportunities for upgrading.,” 2013. [Online]. Available:http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=lah&AN=20143001877&site=
  46. ehost-live%5Cnhttp://www.cabi.org/cabdirect/showpdf.aspx?PAN=http://www.cabi.org/cabdirect/showpdf.aspx?PAN=20143001877%5Cnhttp://academiapublishing.org/ajar/pdf/2013/Aug/Kadigi
  47. R. M. J. Kadigi, I. L. Kadigi, G. H. Laswai, and J. J. Kashaigili, Value chain of indigenous cattle and beef products in Mwanza region, Tanzania: market access, linkages and opportunities for upgrading., vol. 1, no. 8. cabidigitallibrary.org, 2013. doi:10.5555/20143001877.
  48. Scialabba (editor) NEH. Experiences of low-external-input livestock systems. Managing Healthy Livestock Production and Consumption. 2022:165-219. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823019-0.00025-8
  49. Thorpe W, Kang’ethe P, Rege JEO, Mosi RO, Mwandotto BAJ, Njuguna P. Crossbreeding Ayrshire, Friesian, and Sahiwal Cattle for Milk Yield and Preweaning Traits of Progeny in the Semiarid Tropics of Kenya. Journal of Dairy Science. 1993;76(7):2001-2012. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(93)77534-7
  50. Saha S, Hasan MN, Uddin MN, Rahman BMM, Khan MMH, Ahmed SSU, et al. A Comparison between Crossbred (Holstein × Local Cattle) and Bangladeshi Local Cattle for Body and Milk Quality Traits. Dairy. 2024;5(1):153-160. doi:10.3390/dairy5010012
  51. Richard OA, Ebenezer KA, Frederick YO. Cattle crossbreeding for sustainable milk production in the tropics. International Journal of Livestock Production. 2020;11(4):108-113. doi:10.5897/ijlp2020.0717
  52. R. E. McDowell, “Crossbreeding in tropical areas with emphasis on milk, health, and fitness,” J. Dairy Sci., vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 2418–2435, 1985.
  53. G. W. Brandt, C. C. Brannon, W. R. Harvey, and R. E. McDowell, “Effects of Crossbreeding on Production Traits in Dairy Cattle,” 1966, Elsevier. doi:
  54. 3168/jds.S0022-0302(66)88064-5.
  55. A. Singh, “Crossbreeding of cattle for increasing milk production in India: A review,” Indian J. Anim. Sci., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 383–390, 2005.
  56. Effa K. Analysis of longevity traits and lifetime productivity of crossbred dairy cows in the Tropical Highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology. 2013;7(11):138-143. doi:10.5897/jcab2013.0375
  57. Hansen PJ. Exploitation of genetic and physiological determinants of embryonic resistance to elevated temperature to improve embryonic survival in dairy cattle during heat stress. Theriogenology. 2007;68:S242-S249. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.008
  58. T. Marsoner, L. Egarter Vigl, F. Manck, G. Jaritz, U. Tappeiner, and E. Tasser,
  59. Marsoner T, Egarter Vigl L, Manck F, Jaritz G, Tappeiner U, Tasser E. Indigenous livestock breeds as indicators for cultural ecosystem services: A spatial analysis within the Alpine Space. Ecological Indicators. 2018;94:55-63. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.046
  60. G. Nitter, “Developing crossbreeding structures for extensive grazing systems utilizing
  61. only indigenous animal genetic resources,” Work. Dev. Breed. Strateg. Low. input Anim. Prod. Environ., pp. 176–206, 2000.
  62. Kovácsné Koncz N, Béri B, Deák B, Kelemen A, Tóth K, Kiss R, et al. Meat production and maintaining biodiversity: Grazing by traditional breeds and crossbred beef cattle in marshes and grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science. 2020;23(2):139-148. doi:10.1111/avsc.12475
  63. Haldar A, Samanta I, Patra AK. Knowledge‐Intensive Livestock Resource Management in a Changing Environment. Sustainable Agriculture Systems and Technologies. 2022:117-168. doi:10.1002/9781119808565.ch7
  64. Sakadevan K, Nguyen ML. Livestock Production and Its Impact on Nutrient Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Advances in Agronomy. 2017:147-184. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2016.10.002
  65. Herath and S. Mohammed, “Selection and Breeding of Cattle in Asia: Strategies and Criteria for Improved Breeding,” Strateg. Criteria Improv. Breed., pp. 11–24, 2009.
  66. Mathew E, Mathew L. Conservation of Landraces and Indigenous Breeds: An Investment for the Future. Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. 2023:291-321. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5841-0_12
  67. Huque K. A performance profile of dairying in Bangladesh - programs, policies and way forwards. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science. 2014;43(2):81-103. doi:10.3329/bjas.v43i2.20662
  68. K. A. Wondimagegn, H. Mazengia, B. M. F. Driver, and S. Chakeredza, “Animal Breeding for Managing Risks,” Agric. Risk Manag. Africa, p. 143, 2017.
  69. Rege JEO, Marshall K, Notenbaert A, Ojango JMK, Okeyo AM. Pro-poor animal improvement and breeding — What can science do? Livestock Science. 2011;136(1):15-28. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.003
  70. O'Grady AP, Mendham DS, Mokany K, Smith GS, Stewart SB, Harrison MT. Grazing systems and natural capital: Influence of grazing management on natural capital in extensive livestock production systems. Nature-Based Solutions. 2024;6:100181. doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100181
  71. Bett R, Okeyo M, Malmfors B, Johansson K, Agaba M, Kugonza D, et al. Cattle Breeds: Extinction or Quasi-Extant? Resources. 2013;2(3):335-357. doi:10.3390/resources2030335
  72. Mamogobo MD, Mapholi NO, Nephawe KA, Nedambale TL, Mpofu TJ, Sanarana YP, et al. Genetic characterisation of non-descript cattle populations in communal areas of South Africa. Animal Production Science. 2020;61(1):84-91. doi:10.1071/an20030
  73. Roschinsky R, Kluszczynska M, Sölkner J, Puskur R, Wurzinger M. Smallholder experiences with dairy cattle crossbreeding in the tropics: from introduction to impact. Animal. 2015;9(1):150-157. doi:10.1017/s1751731114002079
  74. Gautam G, Khadka U. Reproductive and Productive Performance of Crossbred and Terai Cattle in Bardiya District of Nepal. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council. 2022;8:64-71. doi:10.3126/jnarc.v8i.44862
  75. Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, food and climate sciences, Injibara University, Injibara, P,O.BOX: 40, Ethiopia, Tariku W, Betsha S, School of Animal and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Hawassa, P.O.BOX: 05, Ethiopia, Melesse A, School of Animal and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Hawassa, P.O.BOX: 05, Ethiopia. Genetic improvement approaches of indigenous cattle breeds for adaptation, conservation and sustainable utilization to changing climate in Ethiopia. Veterinary Integrative Sciences. 2024;22(1):231-250. doi:10.12982/vis.2024.018