STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Industrial and Product Design Engineering Original Research

Examining Research Patterns and Concepts in Relation to Frameworks for Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM)

  1. Ashish Patel Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shree Parekh Engineering College
  2. Anjana R Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laxmi Institute of Technology, Sarigam,

Abstract

Structures abound in writing about Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM). Nevertheless, no effort has been made to date to identify the anomalies in the systems that are in place now and the associated research trends. This research is motivated primarily by a survey of SSCM structures and feature abnormalities. The analysis also promotes new applications and aids in the analysis of SSCM structure constructions and exploration patterns. Using the Scopus database, it concludes a few systems in the SSCM domain for the period of 2005–2022, employing space specialists and an organised writing audit technique. It involves building squares and developments as well as employing a series of purposefully designed requirements-based questions to obtain patterns. In specifically, system arrange, utilisation stage catching current exploration patterns, and build organise are the three distinct stages at which it finds abnormalities. It also provides intricacies at the level of development and Structural Square. As such, it provides guidance for reducing anomalies and possible modifications to current frameworks. It revealed current developments and sub-builds and provided information about upcoming business changes that will impact the SSCM industry. It also teaches about the advantages and disadvantages of each system. The inquiry will push for new procedures to promote applications and reduce irregularities, which will aid in changes or updates to current structures. This unique report helps with system development by identifying anomalies at every step, provides a structure-based survey, and illustrates study tendencies. It aids in reducing anomalies and provides guidance for alterations to the SSCM structure while considering upcoming challenges.

Keywords

References (50)

  1. Abdullah L, Zulkifli N. Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015;42(9):4397-4409. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.021
  2. Albliwi S, Antony J, Abdul Halim Lim S, van der Wiele T. Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2014;31(9):1012-1030. doi:10.1108/ijqrm-09-2013-0147
  3. Arumugam V, Antony J, Douglas A. Observation: a Lean tool for improving the effectiveness of Lean Six Sigma. The TQM Journal. 2012;24(3):275-287. doi:10.1108/17542731211226781
  4. Avikal S, Mishra PK, Jain R. A Fuzzy AHP and PROMETHEE method-based heuristic for disassembly line balancing problems. International Journal of Production Research. 2013;52(5):1306-1317. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.831999
  5. Ayağ Z. A combined fuzzy AHP-simulation approach to CAD software selection. International Journal of General Systems. 2010;39(7):731-756. doi:10.1080/03081079.2010.495190
  6. Beikkhakhian Y, Javanmardi M, Karbasian M, Khayambashi B. The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015;42(15-16):6224-6236. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.035
  7. Beske P, Seuring S. Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2014;19(3):322-331. doi:10.1108/scm-12-2013-0432
  8. Bhosale, V. A. and Kant, R. (2014) ‘Selection of best knowledge flow practicing organisation using hybrid fuzzy AHP-VIKOR method’, International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk and Management, 5(3), pp. 234–262.
  9. Chan FTS, Kumar N, Tiwari MK, Lau HCW, Choy KL. Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research. 2008;46(14):3825-3857. doi:10.1080/00207540600787200
  10. Chen LH, Hung CC. An integrated fuzzy approach for the selection of outsourcing manufacturing partners in pharmaceutical R&D. International Journal of Production Research. 2010;48(24):7483-7506. doi:10.1080/00207540903365308
  11. Curwen, L. G. (2012) ‘Challenges and solutions sustainable apparel product development: A case study of Eileen Fisher’, pp. 1–82.
  12. Ding JF. Applying fuzzy AHP approach to assess key value activities for ocean freight forwarders in Taiwan. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics. 2011;14(3):331-346. doi:10.1080/09720502.2011.10700755
  13. Ganguly KK, Guin KK. A fuzzy AHP approach for inbound supply risk assessment. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2013;20(1):129-146. doi:10.1108/14635771311299524
  14. Giannakis M, Papadopoulos T. Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics. 2016;171:455-470. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032
  15. Gilinsky A, Newton SK, Vega RF. Sustainability in the Global Wine Industry: Concepts and Cases. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2016;8:37-49. doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.006
  16. Guo Z, Liu H, Zhang D, Yang J. Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Apparel Manufacturing Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Sustainability. 2017;9(4):650. doi:10.3390/su9040650
  17. He T, Ho W, Lee Ka Man C, Xu X. A fuzzy AHP based integer linear programming model for the multi‐criteria transshipment problem. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2012;23(1):159-179. doi:10.1108/09574091211226975
  18. Hervani AA, Helms MM, Sarkis J. Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2005;12(4):330-353. doi:10.1108/14635770510609015
  19. Huang CT, Yeh TM, Lin WT, Lee BT. A fuzzy AHP-based performance evaluation model for implementing SPC in the Taiwanese LCD industry. International Journal of Production Research. 2009;47(18):5163-5183. doi:10.1080/00207540801935608
  20. Inoue H, Yamada S. Critical factors for process improvement in pharmaceutical research. The TQM Journal. 2013;25(2):141-152. doi:10.1108/17542731311299582
  21. Khan SAR, Yu Z, Golpira H, Sharif A, Mardani A. A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis on sustainable supply chain management: Future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;278:123357. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357
  22. Kim H, Lee CW. The Effects of Customer Perception and Participation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Smartphone Industry Study. Sustainability. 2018;10(7):2271. doi:10.3390/su10072271
  23. Kudla NL, Klaas-Wissing T. Sustainability in shipper-logistics service provider relationships: A tentative taxonomy based on agency theory and stimulus-response analysis. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2012;18(4):218-231. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2012.04.001
  24. Kumar A, Shankar R, Debnath RM. Analyzing customer preference and measuring relative efficiency in telecom sector: A hybrid fuzzy AHP/DEA study. Telematics and Informatics. 2015;32(3):447-462. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2014.10.003
  25. Kumar D, Rahman Z. Sustainability adoption through buyer supplier relationship across supply chain: A literature review and conceptual framework. International Strategic Management Review. 2015;3(1-2):110-127. doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.002
  26. Kumar M, Antony J. Comparing the quality management practices in UK SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2008;108(9):1153-1166. doi:10.1108/02635570810914865
  27. Kuo RJ, Lee LY, Hu TL. Developing a supplier selection system through integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEA: a case study on an auto lighting system company in Taiwan. Production Planning & Control. 2010;21(5):468-484. doi:10.1080/09537280903458348
  28. Lee AHI. A fuzzy AHP evaluation model for buyer–supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. International Journal of Production Research. 2009;47(15):4255-4280. doi:10.1080/00207540801908084
  29. Lieder M, Rashid A. Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;115:36-51. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042
  30. Lin C. Application of fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology. 2013;25(3):171-183. doi:10.1108/09556221311300192
  31. Lintukangas K, Hallikas J, Kähkönen AK. The Role of Green Supply Management in the Development of Sustainable Supply Chain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2013;22(6):321-333. doi:10.1002/csr.1348
  32. Luthra S, Garg D, Haleem A. Green supply chain management. Journal of Advances in Management Research. 2014;11(1):20-46. doi:10.1108/jamr-07-2012-0027
  33. Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK. Flexible Decision Approach for Analysing Performance of Sustainable Supply Chains Under Risks/Uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2014;15(2):113-130. doi:10.1007/s40171-014-0059-8
  34. McLean R, Antony J. Why continuous improvement initiatives fail in manufacturing environments? A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2014;63(3):370-376. doi:10.1108/ijppm-07-2013-0124
  35. Mengistie BT, Mol APJ, Oosterveer P. Private Environmental Governance in the Ethiopian Pesticide Supply Chain: Importation, Distribution and Use. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2016;76(1):65-73. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2015.11.005
  36. Ng CY, Chuah KB. Evaluation of Eco design alternatives by integrating AHP and TOPSIS methodology under a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. 2012;7(1):43-52. doi:10.1080/17509653.2012.10671206
  37. Parlak AI, Lambert JH, Guterbock TM, Clements JL. Population behavioral scenarios influencing radiological disaster preparedness and planning. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2012;48:353-362. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.007
  38. Patel, A. and Desai, T. N. (no date) ‘“Study Of Supply Chain Management Performance Method In Textile Industry”’.
  39. Patil SK, Kant R. A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in Supply Chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014;41(2):679-693. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.093
  40. Patil, Sachin K and Kant, R. (2014) ‘Ranking the barriers of knowledge management adoption in supply chain using fuzzy AHP method’, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 8(1), pp. 52–75.
  41. Pepper MPJ, Spedding TA. The evolution of lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2010;27(2):138-155. doi:10.1108/02656711011014276
  42. Samvedi A, Jain V, Chan FTS. Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Production Research. 2013;51(8):2433-2442. doi:10.1080/00207543.2012.741330
  43. Seuring S, Müller M. Core issues in sustainable supply chain management – a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2007;17(8):455-466. doi:10.1002/bse.607
  44. Shamsuddoha M, Quaddus M, Klass D. Sustainable poultry production process to mitigate socio-economic challenge. Humanomics. 2015;31(3):242-259. doi:10.1108/h-09-2012-0017
  45. Shekarian E, Ijadi B, Zare A, Majava J. Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices. Sustainability. 2022;14(13):7892. doi:10.3390/su14137892
  46. Shukla RK, Garg D, Agarwal A. An integrated approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in modeling supply chain coordination. Production & Manufacturing Research. 2014;2(1):415-437. doi:10.1080/21693277.2014.919886
  47. Snee RD. Lean Six Sigma – getting better all the time. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2010;1(1):9-29. doi:10.1108/20401461011033130
  48. Su Z, Zhang M, Wu W. Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4409. doi:10.3390/su13084409
  49. Yadav G, Seth D, Desai TN. Application of hybrid framework to facilitate lean six sigma implementation: a manufacturing company case experience. Production Planning & Control. 2017;29(3):185-201. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1402134
  50. Zayed EO, Yaseen EA. Barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation in Egyptian industries: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2020;32(6):1192-1209. doi:10.1108/meq-12-2019-0271