STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Emergency and Trauma Nursing and Practices Original Research

A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Protective Techniques of Facial Pressure Ulcer Among Patients on Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in PCCM Department at Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

  1. Sahil Nandal Department of Nursing Critical Care, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences
  2. Hemwati College of Nursing, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences
  3. Pawan Kumar Singh Department of Post-Critical Care Management, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of protective techniques in preventing facial pressure ulcers among patients on non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the Post-Critical Care Management (PCCM) department at Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak. Facial pressure ulcers are a common complication in patients undergoing non-invasive mechanical ventilation, often resulting from prolonged pressure on facial tissues due to mask contact. This descriptive study involved a sample of 60 patients receiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Protective techniques such as repositioning the patient, the use of cushioning materials, and frequent skin assessments were implemented as interventions. Data were collected through observational checklists, which included factors like mask fit, frequency of repositioning, and incidence of facial pressure ulcers. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in the occurrence of facial pressure ulcers among patients who received these protective measures compared to those who did not. This study highlights the importance of preventive strategies in the PCCM department and emphasizes the role of nursing staff in implementing such techniques to enhance patient care. The findings suggest that systematic use of protective techniques can significantly reduce the risk of facial pressure ulcers, improving patient comfort and reducing treatment costs. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of these protective interventions and their application in other critical care settings.

Keywords

References (13)

  1. Paus-Jenssen ES, Reid JK, Cockcroft DW, Laframboise K, Ward HA. The Use of Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure at a Tertiary Care Center. Chest. 2004;126(1):165-172. doi:10.1378/chest.126.1.165
  2. Otero DP, Domínguez DV, Fernández LH, Magariño AS, González VJ, Klepzing JV, Montesinos JV. Preventing facial pressure ulcers in patients under non-invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomised control trial. J Wound Care. 2017 Mar 2;26(3): 128– doi:10.12968/jowc.2017. 26.3.128. PMID: 28277990.
  3. Lloys A, Madrid C, Solà M, Segura M, Tarrés E, Mas A. Efecto del sellado con agua de la máscara facial para ventilación no invasiva en la aparición de úlceras faciales por presión. Enfermería Intensiva. 2003;14(1):3-6. doi:10.1016/s1130-2399(03)78090-0
  4. Schallom M, Cracchiolo L, Falker A, Foster J, Hager J, Morehouse T, et al. Pressure Ulcer Incidence in Patients Wearing Nasal-Oral Versus Full-Face Noninvasive Ventilation Masks. American Journal of Critical Care. 2015;24(4):349-356. doi:10.4037/ajcc2015386
  5. Raurell-Torredà M, Argilaga-Molero E, Colomer-Plana M, Ródenas-Fransico A, Ruiz-Garcia MT, Uya Muntaña J. Optimising non-invasive mechanical ventilation: Which unit should care for these patients? A cohort study. Australian Critical Care. 2017;30(4):225-233. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2016.08.005
  6. Black JM, Cuddigan JE, Walko MA, Didier LA, Lander MJ, Kelpe MR. Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients. International Wound Journal. 2010;7(5):358-365. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2010.00699.x
  7. Gefen A, Weihs D. Mechanical cytoprotection: A review of cytoskeleton-protection approaches for cells. Journal of Biomechanics. 2016;49(8):1321-1329. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.030
  8. Dellweg D, Hochrainer D, Klauke M, et al. Determinants of skin contact pressure formation during non-invasive ventilation. J Biomech 2010; 43: 652–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009. 029.
  9. Gefen A, Alves P, Ciprandi G, Coyer F, Milne CT, Ousey K, et al. Device-related pressure ulcers: SECURE prevention. Second edition. Journal of Wound Care. 2022;31(Sup3a):S1-S72. doi:10.12968/jowc.2022.31.sup3a.s1
  10. Weng MH. The effect of protective treatment in reducing pressure ulcers for non-invasive ventilation patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008 Oct; 24(5): 295– doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2007. 11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 1. PMID: 18242994.
  11. Acorda DE. Nursing and Respiratory Collaboration Prevents BiPAP-Related Pressure Ulcers. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2015;30(4):620-623. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2015.04.001
  12. Navalesi P, Fanfulla F, Frigerio P, Gregoretti C, Nava S. Physiologic evaluation of noninvasive mechanical ventilation delivered with three types of masks in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Critical Care Medicine. 2000;28(6):1785-1790. doi:10.1097/00003246-200006000-00015
  13. Chai-Coetzer CL, Pathinathan A, Smith BJ. Continuous positive airway pressure delivery interfaces for obstructive sleep apnoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;2014(6). doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005308.pub2