STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

International Journal of Cell Biology and Cellular Functions Review Article

Recent Developments in Structural Genomics: Uncovering Cellular Functions

  1. Aditi Arvi Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Allahabad, Allahabad

Abstract

Structural genomics has become a groundbreaking field for understanding cellular functions by revealing the three-dimensional structures of proteins and other biomolecules. This field combines advanced methods like X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, cryo-electron microscopy, and computational modeling to explore the molecular structure and behavior of cellular components. Recent advances have significantly accelerated the pace of structure determination, bolstered by high-throughput methods and artificial intelligence tools like AlphaFold. These developments have not only expanded structural databases but have also provided deep insights into the relationship between protein structure and function, advancing our understanding of biological processes at the molecular level. One of the pivotal outcomes of structural genomics is its application in elucidating the mechanisms of disease-related proteins, offering critical insights for therapeutic development. Structural studies of membrane proteins, enzyme complexes, and transcription factors have revealed novel binding sites, guiding the rational design of drugs and inhibitors. Furthermore, the integration of structural data with omics technologies has paved the way for systems biology approaches, enabling comprehensive insights into cellular networks and pathways. This review highlights the recent breakthroughs in structural genomics, focusing on innovative methods, computational approaches, and key discoveries that have enhanced our understanding of cell function. By discussing the current challenges and future directions, it underscores the potential of structural genomics in addressing fundamental biological questions and advancing precision medicine. This field’s integration with rapidly evolving computational and experimental technologies promises to unlock further insights into the complex architecture of life.

Keywords

References (18)

  1. Zhang C, Kim SH. Overview of structural genomics: from structure to function. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2003;7(1):28-32. doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00015-7
  2. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–9.
  3. Dillard RS, Hampton CM, Strauss JD, Ke Z, Altomara D, Guerrero-Ferreira RC, et al. Biological Applications at the Cutting Edge of Cryo-Electron Microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis. 2018;24(4):406-419. doi:10.1017/s1431927618012382
  4. Vinothkumar KR, Henderson R. Structures of membrane proteins. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 2010;43(1):65-158. doi:10.1017/s0033583510000041
  5. Kuhlman B, Bradley P. Advances in protein structure prediction and design. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2019;20(11):681-697. doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0163-x
  6. Liddington RC. Structural Basis of Protein-Protein Interactions. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2015:3-22. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2425-7_1
  7. Roberts G. The role of protein dynamics in allosteric effects—introduction. Biophysical Reviews. 2015;7(2):161-163. doi:10.1007/s12551-015-0174-6
  8. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234(3):779–815. doi: 10.10 06/jmbi.1993.1626.
  9. Teichmann SA, Chothia C, Gerstein M. Advances in structural genomics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 1999;9(3):390-399. doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(99)80053-0
  10. Forli S, Huey R, Pique ME, Sanner MF, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. Computational protein–ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite. Nature Protocols. 2016;11(5):905-919. doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.051
  11. Forouhar F, Kuzin A, Seetharaman J, Lee I, Zhou W, Abashidze M, et al. Functional insights from structural genomics. Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics. 2007;8(2-3):37-44. doi:10.1007/s10969-007-9018-3
  12. Smyth MS, Martin JHJ. x Ray crystallography. Molecular Pathology. 2000;53(1):8-14. doi:10.1136/mp.53.1.8
  13. Berman HM. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000;28(1):235-242. doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235
  14. Zhu KF, Yuan C, Du YM, Sun KL, Zhang XK, Vogel H, et al. Applications and prospects of cryo-EM in drug discovery. Military Medical Research. 2023;10(1). doi:10.1186/s40779-023-00446-y
  15. Dobson CM. The structural basis of protein folding and its links with human disease. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2001;356(1406):133-145. doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0758
  16. Moore JB, Weeks ME. Proteomics and Systems Biology: Current and Future Applications in the Nutritional Sciences. Advances in Nutrition. 2011;2(4):355-364. doi:10.3945/an.111.000554
  17. Gomes PSFC, Gomes DEB, Bernardi RC. Protein structure prediction in the era of AI: Challenges and limitations when applying to in silico force spectroscopy. Frontiers in Bioinformatics. 2022;2. doi:10.3389/fbinf.2022.983306
  18. Szymański P, Markowicz M, Mikiciuk-Olasik E. Adaptation of High-Throughput Screening in Drug Discovery—Toxicological Screening Tests. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2011;13(1):427-452. doi:10.3390/ijms13010427