Research and Reviews : Journal of Crop science and Technology
Evaluation of Fungicides and Bioagents against Pyricularia grisea in vitro
Abstract
AbstractBlast disease, a standout amongst the most pulverizing infections of rice in most rice delivering regions of the world is caused by Pyricularia grisea [1]. In Nepal, the infection causes 10–20% yield diminishment in vulnerable assortments, however in extreme case; it goes up to 80% [2]. Chemicals are ordinarily connected for controlling rice impact sickness [3], yet when chemicals are utilized aimlessly, they likewise represent a genuine risk to the earth. A trial was directed to check mycelial development of P. grisea with hexaconazole, tricyclazole, kasugamycin, carbendazim and neem seed, removed by harmed nourishment system at 50 and 100 ppm, and Trichoderma viridae by double culture strategy, in-vitro amid August–October 2014 in laboratory of plant pathology division, Khumaltar. Colony diameter of pathogen and antagonist was measured in centimeter at 96, 120, 144, 168, 192 and 216 h incubation period and mean computed. Growth reduction of the pathogen by the fungicides and antagonist was calculated [6]. Tricyclazole appeared better to control growth of P. grisea than all other chemicals at both concentrations. However, T. viridae appeared quite comparable to tricyclazole. So, T. viridae and tricyclazole should be tested in field to verify the results and to control the blast of rice. Thus, using minimum dose of appropriate fungicide or bio-agents alternative to fungicide, help in reducing health hazard by minimizing adverse impact on environment.Keywords: Pyricularia grisea, hexaconazole, tricyclazole, kasugamycin, carbendazim, neem seed and Trichoderma viridae, myceliaCite this Article Prakash Ghimire, Gopal KC, Shrestha Sundar M. et. al. Evaluation of Fungicides and Bioagents against Pyricularia grisea in vitro. Research & Reviews: Journal of Crop Science and Technology. 2017; 6(1): 33–36p. Keywords: Pyricularia grisea, hexaconazole, tricyclazole, kasugamycin, carbendazim, neem seed and Trichoderma viridae, myceliaReferences (6)
- Ou SH. Rice Disease. 2nd Edn . Farham House, United Kingdom: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau International Mycological Institute; 1985; 380p.
- Manandhar HK, Shrestha K, Amatya P. Seed-Borne Disea ses. In : Mathur SB, Amatya P, Shrestha K, et al. , editors. Plant Diseases, Seed Production and Seed Health Testing in Nepal. Copenhagen, 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Tricyclazole Bavistin Hexaconazole Kasu-B Believe Control Mean mycelial diameter (cm) 50 ppm 100 ppm Fungicides and Bio-Agents against Pyricularia grisea Ghimire et al. RRJoCST (2017) 33-36 © STM Journals 2017. All Rights Reserved Page 36 Denmark: Danish Government, Institute of Seed Pathology for Developing Countries; 1992; 59–74p.
- Oh YY. Genome-Wide Transcription Studies on Infection Structure For mation and Function in Magnaporthe grisea . Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University. 2007; 142p.
- HCRP. Finger Millet Research Report. In: Annual Repor t 1 997. NARC/HCRP, Kabre, Dolakha. 2003.
- Babar LK, Iftikhar T, Khan HN, et al. Agronomic Trials on Sugarcane Cr op under Faisalabad Conditions, Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 2011; 43: 929–935p.
- Riungu G. M., Muthorni J. W., Narla R. D., Wagacha J. M., Gathumbi J. K. (2008). Management of Fusarium head blight of wheat and deoxynivalenol accumulation using antagonistic microorganisms. Plant Pathol. J. 7 13 –19. 10.3923/ppj.2008.13.19 Cite this Article Prakash Ghimire, Gopal KC, Shrestha Sundar M . et. al. Evaluation of Fungicides and Bioagents against Pyricularia grisea in vitro. Research & Reviews: Journal of Crop Science and Technology. 2017; 6(1): 33–36p.