STM Journals Peer-reviewed research from Consortium e-Learning Network

Research and Reviews : Journal of Computational Biology Review Article

Data Integration and Visualization in Bioinformatics: Techniques and Challenges

  1. Mansi Srivastava Department of Biotechnology, Amity University Gurgaon

Abstract

Data integration and visualization play essential roles in bioinformatics, facilitating the thorough analysis, and interpretation of intricate biological datasets. In the field of bioinformatics, vast amounts of data are generated from various experimental platforms, such as genomic sequencing, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics. However, the heterogeneity of these datasets, coupled with their large scale and complexity, presents significant challenges in terms of integration, analysis, and visualization. Data integration techniques aim to combine disparate datasets from multiple sources, enabling the creation of a unified view of biological systems. These methods include approaches, such as concatenation, matrix factorization, and multivariate statistics, along with more advanced techniques leveraging machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Integration is essential for revealing hidden relationships between various types of biological data and for generating holistic insights into the underlying biology. Visualization tools are crucial for transforming complex biological data into easily understandable formats. They transform raw data into intuitive visual representations, such as heatmaps, scatter plots, and network diagrams, which facilitate the identification of patterns, trends, and outliers. Advanced techniques like principal component analysis (PCA), t-SNE, and network-based visualizations are increasingly being used to represent multidimensional data. Despite the advancements, challenges persist in integrating and visualizing bioinformatics data. Issues, such as data heterogeneity, scalability, noise, and the curse of dimensionality complicate these tasks. Additionally, integrating multi-omics data and visualizing high-dimensional datasets continue to present major challenges. This article discusses the techniques used in data integration and visualization, highlights the challenges faced, and outlines the future directions in bioinformatics for overcoming these hurdles.

Keywords

References (40)

  1. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics. 2000;25(1):25-29. doi:10.1038/75556
  2. Koh GCKW, Porras P, Aranda B, Hermjakob H, Orchard SE. Analyzing Protein–Protein Interaction Networks. Journal of Proteome Research. 2012;11(4):2014-2031. doi:10.1021/pr201211w
  3. Baldi P, Brunak S. Bioinformatics: The machine learning approach. MIT Press; 2001.
  4. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;47(D1):D506-D515. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049
  5. Beißbarth T, Speed TP. GOstat: find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(9):1464-1465. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth088
  6. Y. Bengio. Learning Deep Architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning. 2009 Jan 1;2(1):1–127. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8187120
  7. Stein-O’Brien GL, Ainslie MC, Fertig EJ. Forecasting cellular states: from descriptive to predictive biology via single-cell multiomics. Current Opinion in Systems Biology. 2021;26:24-32. doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.008
  8. Conesa A, Madrigal P, Tarazona S, Gomez-Cabrero D, Cervera A, McPherson A, et al. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biology. 2016;17(1). doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0881-8
  9. Allen GI. Statistical data integration: Challenges and opportunities. Statistical Modelling. 2017;17(4-5):332-337. doi:10.1177/1471082x17707429
  10. Díez P, Droste C, Dégano RM, González-Muñoz M, Ibarrola N, Pérez-Andrés M, et al. Integration of Proteomics and Transcriptomics Data Sets for the Analysis of a Lymphoma B-Cell Line in the Context of the Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project. Journal of Proteome Research. 2015;14(9):3530-3540. doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00474
  11. Fayyad U, Stolorz P. Data mining and KDD: Promise and challenges. Future Generation Computer Systems. 1997;13(2-3):99-115. doi:10.1016/s0167-739x(97)00015-0
  12. Mehboob-ur-Rahman TS, Mahmood-ur-Rahman MA, Zafar Y. Bioinformatics: A way forward to explore “plant omics”. Bioinformatics-Updated Features and Applications. Croatia: Intech; 2016. p. 203.
  13. Ren G, Zhang X, Li Y, Ridout K, Serrano-Serrano ML, Yang Y, et al. Large-scale whole-genome resequencing unravels the domestication history of Cannabis sativa. Science Advances. 2021;7(29). doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg2286
  14. Iorio F, Knijnenburg TA, Vis DJ, Bignell GR, Menden MP, Schubert M, et al. A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer. Cell. 2016;166(3):740-754. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.017
  15. Srivastava S, Aggarwal S, Karmakar A, Krishnakumar S, Paul U, Singh A, et al. Advances in Drug Discovery based on Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics in Malaria. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2023;23(7):551-578. doi:10.2174/1568026623666230418114455
  16. Patra P, Izawa T, Pena-Castillo L. REPA: Applying Pathway Analysis to Genome-Wide Transcription Factor Binding Data. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 2018;15(4):1270-1283. doi:10.1109/tcbb.2015.2453948
  17. Olsen LR, Campos B, Barnkob MS, Winther O, Brusic V, Andersen MH. Bioinformatics for cancer immunotherapy target discovery. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy. 2014;63(12):1235-1249. doi:10.1007/s00262-014-1627-7
  18. Rossini GP. Towards tailored assays for cell-based approaches to toxicity testing. ALTEX. 2012;29(4):359-372. doi:10.14573/altex.2012.4.359
  19. Fernandez NF, Gundersen GW, Rahman A, Grimes ML, Rikova K, Hornbeck P, et al. Clustergrammer, a web-based heatmap visualization and analysis tool for high-dimensional biological data. Scientific Data. 2017;4(1). doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.151
  20. Kuleshov MV, Jones MR, Rouillard AD, Fernandez NF, Duan Q, Wang Z, et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44(W1):W90-W97. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377
  21. Chen S, Qin R, Mahal LK. Sweet systems: technologies for glycomic analysis and their integration into systems biology. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2021;56(3):301-320. doi:10.1080/10409238.2021.1908953
  22. Graw S, Chappell K, Washam CL, Gies A, Bird J, Robeson MS, et al. Multi-omics data integration considerations and study design for biological systems and disease. Molecular Omics. 2020;17(2):170-185. doi:10.1039/d0mo00041h
  23. Yu XT, Zeng T. Integrative Analysis of Omics Big Data. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018:109-135. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_7
  24. McInnes L, Healy J, Saul N, Großberger L. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. Journal of Open Source Software. 2018;3(29):861. doi:10.21105/joss.00861
  25. NCI CPTAC, Mertins P, Mani DR, Ruggles KV, Gillette MA, Clauser KR, et al. Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature. 2016;534(7605):55-62. doi:10.1038/nature18003
  26. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nature Genetics. 2003;34(3):267-273. doi:10.1038/ng1180
  27. Lapatas V, Stefanidakis M, Jimenez RC, Via A, Schneider MV. Data integration in biological research: an overview. Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki. 2015;22(1). doi:10.1186/s40709-015-0032-5
  28. Platzer A. Visualization of SNPs with t-SNE. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e56883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056883
  29. Gutierrez Reyes CD, Alejo-Jacuinde G, Perez Sanchez B, Chavez Reyes J, Onigbinde S, Mogut D, et al. Multi Omics Applications in Biological Systems. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024;46(6):5777-5793. doi:10.3390/cimb46060345
  30. Perez-Riverol Y, Csordas A, Bai J, Bernal-Llinares M, Hewapathirana S, Kundu DJ, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;47(D1):D442-D450. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1106
  31. Gallo Cantafio ME, Grillone K, Caracciolo D, Scionti F, Arbitrio M, Barbieri V, et al. From Single Level Analysis to Multi-Omics Integrative Approaches: A Powerful Strategy towards the Precision Oncology. High-Throughput. 2018;7(4):33. doi:10.3390/ht7040033
  32. Marko NF, Quackenbush J, Weil RJ. Why Is There a Lack of Consensus on Molecular Subgroups of Glioblastoma? Understanding the Nature of Biological and Statistical Variability in Glioblastoma Expression Data. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e20826. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020826
  33. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43(7):e47-e47. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007
  34. Diboun I, Wernisch L, Orengo CA, Koltzenburg M. Microarray analysis after RNA amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma. BMC Genomics. 2006;7(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-252
  35. Pettini F, Visibelli A, Cicaloni V, Iovinelli D, Spiga O. Multi-Omics Model Applied to Cancer Genetics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(11):5751. doi:10.3390/ijms22115751
  36. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102(43):15545-15550. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102
  37. Zhang Z, Zhao L, Wei X, Guo Q, Zhu X, Wei R, et al. Integrated bioinformatic analysis of microarray data reveals shared gene signature between MDS and AML. Oncology Letters. 2018. doi:10.3892/ol.2018.9237
  38. Auwerx C, Sadler MC, Reymond A, Kutalik Z. From pharmacogenetics to pharmaco-omics: Milestones and future directions. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. 2022;3(2):100100. doi:10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100100
  39. Hill M, Tran N. miRNA interplay: mechanisms and consequences in cancer. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2021;14(4). doi:10.1242/dmm.047662
  40. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50.
Support