Journal of Production Research & Management Original Research
Enhancing Production Line Efficiency: Simulating and Optimizing Single and Parallel Line Processes
Abstract
During a time of fast-paced industrial growth, increasing production line effectiveness is a core issue for manufacturers looking to maximize output, reduce waste, and stay competitive. This study explores the use of simulation-based optimization methods to enhance single and parallel production line designs. Stepping beyond traditional trial-and-error methods, the research utilizes Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation to simulate actual manufacturing scenarios, considering intricacies like buffer capacities, machine sequencing, and event-driven scheduling. Substantial gains in performance were made by applying optimized parallel line layouts, notably a 24% gain in throughput, 829 to 1,032 units, testifying to the real payback of strategic line-of-production optimization. Such outcomes attest to the merits of forward-looking scenario planning and dynamic allocation of resources based on lean manufacturing philosophy and for delivering on the essence of Industry 4.0. At the center of this strategy are simulation methods like Discrete Event Simulation (DES), System Dynamics (SD), and Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), each with unique strengths based on the complexity and character of the production setting. The study also assesses commonly adopted simulation software like Arena, Simul8, and FlexSim, focusing on their strengths in modeling, performance analysis, and scenario assessment. Concurrently, assorted optimization methods like line balancing, genetic algorithms, and hybrid scheduling models are investigated to optimize workflow distribution and increase system productivity. Visual aids like bottleneck analyzers and Gantt charts also assist decision-making by providing transparent, fact-based insights into system performance. Finally, the research emphasizes that simulation is not only a forecast tool but a strategic tool for designing agile, scalable, and lean production systems. When paired with smart planning paradigms and real-time production feedback, simulation enables organizations to break free from conventional manufacturing limitations and progress toward more adaptive, intelligent manufacturing solutions.
Keywords
References (17)
- Werner M. Parallel Processing Strategies for Big Geospatial Data. Frontiers in Big Data. 2019;2. doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00044
- Lusa A. A survey of the literature on the multiple or parallel assembly line balancing problem. European J. of Industrial Engineering. 2008;2(1):50. doi:10.1504/ejie.2008.016329
- Freitas AA, Lavington SH. Basic Concepts on Parallel Processing. Mining Very Large Databases with Parallel Processing. 2000:61-69. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5521-6_7
- Fowler JW, Mönch L. A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing. European Journal of Operational Research. 2022;298(1):1-24. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.012
- Fischer R, Plessow F. Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01366
- Nassi JJ, Callaway EM. Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2009;10(5):360-372. doi:10.1038/nrn2619
- Garcia EF, Zúñiga ER, Bruch J, Moris MU, Syberfeldt A. Simulation-based Optimization for Facility Layout Design in Conditions of High Uncertainty. Procedia CIRP. 2018;72:334-339. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.227
- Kordaczek R, Pilat AK. Prototype and Simulation Model of a Robotic Hand. 2020 International Conference Mechatronic Systems and Materials (MSM). 2020:1-6. doi:10.1109/msm49833.2020.9201741
- Janeková J, Fabianová J, Kádárová J. Optimization of the Automated Production Process Using Software Simulation Tools. Processes. 2023;11(2):509. doi:10.3390/pr11020509
- Mahdi Mohammad, Rise Zeinab, Anvariazar Improving Production Line Performance through Simulation and Bottleneck Analysis using AnyLogic Software. 20th International Conference of Modern Research in Management, Economics and Development. 2024; 1–10.
- Yegul MF, Erenay FS, Striepe S, Yavuz Improving configuration of complex production lines via simulation-based optimization. Comput Ind Eng. 2017; 109: 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2017.04.019.
- Choi H, Yu S, Lee D, Noh SD, Ji S, Kim H, et al. Optimization of the Factory Layout and Production Flow Using Production-Simulation-Based Reinforcement Learning. Machines. 2024;12(6):390. doi:10.3390/machines12060390
- Quadras D, Frazzon EM, Mendes LG, Pires MC, Rodriguez CMT. Adaptive Simulation-Based Optimization for Production Scheduling: A Comparative Study. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2022;55(10):424-429. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.430
- Zhu L, Zhang Z, Guan C. Multi-objective partial parallel disassembly line balancing problem using hybrid group neighbourhood search algorithm. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2020;56:252-269. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.013
- Coutinho Demetrios AM, De Sensi D, Lorenzon AF, Georgiou K, Nunez-Yanez J, Eder K, et al. Performance and Energy Trade-Offs for Parallel Applications on Heterogeneous Multi-Processing Systems. Energies. 2020;13(9):2409. doi:10.3390/en13092409
- Ahmed R, Doyley MM. Parallel Receive Beamforming Improves the Performance of Focused Transmit-Based Single-Track Location Shear Wave Elastography. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 2020;67(10):2057-2068. doi:10.1109/tuffc.2020.2998979
- Balaji V, Lucia B. Combining Data Duplication and Graph Reordering to Accelerate Parallel Graph Processing. Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing. 2019:133-144. doi:10.1145/3307681.3326609